本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

unit-economics

Establishes whether the business makes money on each customer or unit — contribution margin, acquisition cost, payback period, lifetime value, and the cohort behavior underneath. Use this to assess whether growth is profitable, evaluate a channel or segment, support a pricing decision, judge how fast the business can afford to grow, or diagnose why revenue growth is not producing profit.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB
  • references/sources.md1.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Unit economics

The question is simple and usually unanswered: does one more customer make the business better off, and how long does that take?

Build it in this order

  1. Define the unit. A customer, an account, a seat, an order. State it, because most disagreements about unit economics are disagreements about the unit.
  2. Contribution margin — revenue per unit minus the costs that vary with it. Include everything that actually varies: payment processing, hosting attributable to usage, support load, delivery, third-party fees. Understating variable cost is the single most common error and it flatters everything downstream.
  3. Acquisition cost — fully loaded. All sales and marketing spend, including salaries, divided by customers acquired in the same period. Excluding people costs is the second most common error and typically understates by half or more.
  4. Payback period — acquisition cost divided by monthly contribution. This is the number that governs how fast you can grow without financing it.
  5. Lifetime value — contribution × expected lifetime, from observed retention. Not from a churn-rate assumption chosen because it produces a good ratio.

Read it honestly

  • Ratios hide the constraint. A healthy lifetime-value ratio with a long payback still means growth consumes cash faster than it produces it. Payback governs the growth rate; the ratio governs whether it is worth doing at all.
  • Segment before concluding. Blended economics almost always conceal one segment subsidizing another. The average is the least useful number.
  • Use cohorts, not averages. Retention improves or decays over time, and blended figures mask which. If early cohorts retain better than recent ones, the business is deteriorating while the average looks stable.
  • Do not extrapolate lifetime beyond your data. A twelve-month-old company cannot observe a three-year lifetime, and assuming one is how unprofitable businesses appear profitable.

What it should change

Good unit economics by segment tell you where to spend. Bad ones tell you to fix the model before scaling — no acquisition efficiency rescues a negative contribution margin, it only reaches the loss faster.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Never

  • Compare acquisition cost against revenue rather than contribution.
  • Report lifetime value without stating the retention data behind it and its observation window.
  • Treat improving ratios as progress without checking whether the mix simply shifted.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0332026年9月18日 更新

Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0332026年9月18日 更新

Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0332026年9月18日 更新

Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0332026年9月18日 更新

Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0332026年9月18日 更新

Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0332026年9月18日 更新

cbrock84 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する