本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

analyzing-snyk

Use when working with Snyk — snyk security scanning and vulnerability analysis. Covers dependency vulnerability scanning, container image scanning, IaC security scanning, code analysis, license compliance, and fix recommendations. Use when scanning for vulnerabilities, analyzing dependency risks, reviewing container security, or auditing IaC configurations.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Snyk Security Analysis Skill

Analyze and manage vulnerabilities using Snyk across dependencies, containers, IaC, and code.

MANDATORY: Discovery-First Pattern

Always check authentication and project list before running scans.

Phase 1: Discovery

#!/bin/bash

echo "=== Snyk Version ==="
snyk --version 2>/dev/null

echo ""
echo "=== Authentication Status ==="
snyk auth --check 2>/dev/null || snyk whoami 2>/dev/null

echo ""
echo "=== Monitored Projects ==="
snyk monitor --dry-run 2>/dev/null || echo "Run 'snyk monitor' to add project"

echo ""
echo "=== Snyk Organizations ==="
snyk config get org 2>/dev/null || echo "Using default org"

Core Helper Functions

#!/bin/bash

# Snyk CLI wrapper with JSON output
snyk_cmd() {
    snyk "$@" --json 2>/dev/null
}

# Snyk API call
snyk_api() {
    local endpoint="$1"
    curl -s -H "Authorization: token $SNYK_TOKEN" \
        "https://api.snyk.io/rest/${endpoint}"
}

# Parse vulnerability severity
snyk_severity_summary() {
    jq '{
        critical: [.vulnerabilities[]? | select(.severity == "critical")] | length,
        high: [.vulnerabilities[]? | select(.severity == "high")] | length,
        medium: [.vulnerabilities[]? | select(.severity == "medium")] | length,
        low: [.vulnerabilities[]? | select(.severity == "low")] | length
    }'
}

Output Rules

  • TOKEN EFFICIENCY: Target <=50 lines per output
  • Use --json output with jq for structured results
  • Summarize by severity instead of listing all vulnerabilities
  • Use --severity-threshold to focus on critical/high issues

Common Operations

Dependency Vulnerability Scan

#!/bin/bash
PROJECT_DIR="${1:-.}"

echo "=== Open Source Vulnerability Scan ==="
snyk test --json "$PROJECT_DIR" 2>/dev/null | jq '{
    project: .projectName,
    package_manager: .packageManager,
    vulnerability_summary: {
        total: (.vulnerabilities | length),
        critical: [.vulnerabilities[] | select(.severity == "critical")] | length,
        high: [.vulnerabilities[] | select(.severity == "high")] | length,
        medium: [.vulnerabilities[] | select(.severity == "medium")] | length,
        fixable: [.vulnerabilities[] | select(.isUpgradable or .isPatchable)] | length
    },
    top_vulnerabilities: [.vulnerabilities | sort_by(-.cvssScore)[:5][] | {
        id: .id,
        title: .title,
        severity: .severity,
        cvss: .cvssScore,
        package: .packageName,
        version: .version,
        fixedIn: .fixedIn
    }]
}'

Container Image Scan

#!/bin/bash
IMAGE="${1:?Container image required}"

echo "=== Container Scan: $IMAGE ==="
snyk container test "$IMAGE" --json 2>/dev/null | jq '{
    image: .docker.image,
    base_image: .docker.baseImage,
    platform: .platform,
    vulnerability_summary: {
        total: (.vulnerabilities | length),
        critical: [.vulnerabilities[] | select(.severity == "critical")] | length,
        high: [.vulnerabilities[] | select(.severity == "high")] | length
    },
    base_image_remediation: .docker.baseImageRemediation,
    top_issues: [.vulnerabilities | sort_by(-.cvssScore)[:5][] | {
        id: .id,
        title: .title,
        severity: .severity,
        package: .packageName,
        nearestFixedIn: .nearestFixedInVersion
    }]
}'

IaC Security Scan

#!/bin/bash
TARGET="${1:-.}"

echo "=== IaC Security Scan ==="
snyk iac test "$TARGET" --json 2>/dev/null | jq '{
    target_file: .targetFile,
    project_type: .projectType,
    issue_summary: {
        total: (.infrastructureAsCodeIssues | length),
        critical: [.infrastructureAsCodeIssues[] | select(.severity == "critical")] | length,
        high: [.infrastructureAsCodeIssues[] | select(.severity == "high")] | length,
        medium: [.infrastructureAsCodeIssues[] | select(.severity == "medium")] | length
    },
    top_issues: [.infrastructureAsCodeIssues | sort_by(-.severity)[:10][] | {
        id: .id,
        title: .title,
        severity: .severity,
        path: .path,
        resolve: .resolve
    }]
}'

License Compliance

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== License Analysis ==="
snyk test --json 2>/dev/null | jq '{
    licenses: [.vulnerabilities[] | select(.type == "license") | {
        package: .packageName,
        license: .license,
        severity: .severity
    }] | unique_by(.package) | .[0:15]
}'

echo ""
echo "=== License Policy ==="
snyk_api "orgs/$(snyk config get org 2>/dev/null)/settings/license-policy" 2>/dev/null | jq '.' | head -20

Fix Recommendations

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Fixable Vulnerabilities ==="
snyk test --json 2>/dev/null | jq '{
    upgradable: [.vulnerabilities[] | select(.isUpgradable) | {
        package: .packageName,
        current: .version,
        upgrade_to: .upgradePath[-1],
        fixes: .id
    }] | unique_by(.package) | .[0:10],
    patchable: [.vulnerabilities[] | select(.isPatchable) | {
        package: .packageName,
        patch: .patches[0].id
    }] | unique_by(.package) | .[0:5]
}'

echo ""
echo "=== Auto-Fix Preview ==="
echo "Run: snyk wizard  # Interactive fix wizard"
echo "Run: snyk fix     # Auto-apply fixes (Snyk CLI v2)"

Safety Rules

  • Scans are read-only -- they do not modify code or dependencies
  • snyk monitor uploads dependency graph to Snyk cloud -- ensure compliance with data policies
  • Container scans pull images -- ensure registry credentials are configured
  • IaC scans may contain sensitive paths -- review output before sharing
  • Fix commands modify package files -- review changes before committing

Output Format

Present results as a structured report:

Analyzing Snyk Report
═════════════════════
Resources discovered: [count]

Resource       Status    Key Metric    Issues
──────────────────────────────────────────────
[name]         [ok/warn] [value]       [findings]

Summary: [total] resources | [ok] healthy | [warn] warnings | [crit] critical
Action Items: [list of prioritized findings]

Target ≤50 lines of output. Use tables for multi-resource comparisons.

Anti-Hallucination Rules

  1. NEVER assume resource names — always discover via CLI/API in Phase 1 before referencing in Phase 2.
  2. NEVER fabricate metric names or dimensions — verify against the service documentation or --help output.
  3. NEVER mix CLI commands between service versions — confirm which version/API you are targeting.
  4. ALWAYS use the discovery → verify → analyze chain — every resource referenced must have been discovered first.
  5. ALWAYS handle empty results gracefully — an empty response is valid data, not an error to retry.

Counter-Rationalizations

ShortcutCounterWhy
"I'll skip discovery and check known resources"Always run Phase 1 discovery firstResource names change, new resources appear — assumed names cause errors
"The user only asked for a quick check"Follow the full discovery → analysis flowQuick checks miss critical issues; structured analysis catches silent failures
"Default configuration is probably fine"Audit configuration explicitlyDefaults often leave logging, security, and optimization features disabled
"Metrics aren't needed for this"Always check relevant metrics when availableAPI/CLI responses show current state; metrics reveal trends and intermittent issues
"I don't have access to that"Try the command and report the actual errorAssumed permission failures prevent useful investigation; actual errors are informative

Common Pitfalls

  • Authentication errors: Token may be expired or scoped to wrong org -- check with snyk auth
  • Missing lockfiles: Snyk needs lockfiles (package-lock.json, Gemfile.lock) for accurate dependency trees
  • Private registries: Container scans need registry auth -- configure Docker credentials first
  • Monorepo scanning: Use --all-projects for monorepos or scan each project directory individually
  • False positives: Some vulnerabilities may not be reachable in your code -- use --reachable-vulns for better accuracy
  • Rate limiting: Heavy API usage can trigger rate limits -- batch operations appropriately
  • Severity thresholds: CI pipelines should use --severity-threshold=high to avoid failing on low-severity issues
  • Snyk Code vs Test: snyk code test scans source code (SAST); snyk test scans dependencies (SCA)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Cloudflare GraphQL Analytics for zone traffic, firewall events, Workers metrics, and schema exploration. Use when querying Cloudflare analytics data or exploring the GraphQL API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Alloydb — google AlloyDB instance analysis, query insights, columnar engine optimization, maintenance windows, and cluster health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Aqua — aqua Security platform analysis. Covers container runtime protection, image assurance policies, compliance frameworks, vulnerability management, workload protection, and registry scanning. Use when analyzing container security posture, reviewing image compliance, investigating runtime alerts, or auditing security policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Bigquery — google BigQuery job analysis, slot utilization, cost analysis, dataset management, and query optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Cassandra — apache Cassandra keyspace analysis, compaction strategies, repair status, nodetool operations, and cluster health monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Checkov — checkov infrastructure-as-code security scanning. Covers Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, and Dockerfile scanning, policy management, custom checks, compliance frameworks, and suppression management. Use when scanning IaC for security misconfigurations, evaluating compliance, managing custom policies, or reviewing scan results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

cloudthinker-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する