本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

pmstudio-irp

Use when the user asks for an incident response plan, IRP, escalation matrix or incident playbook. Writes an offline HTML plan with severities, escalation contacts and comms; DR restores service, IRP runs the incident.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • references/escalation-patterns.md3.0 KB
  • references/severity-matrix.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

IRP — Incident Response Plan

Purpose

Generates an Incident Response Plan specific to the product/platform. Not a generic IT incident template — this plan is scoped to the product, uses its real stakeholders as escalation contacts, and ties severity to its data classification.

Process

Step 1: Read Context

Read all that exist:

  • CLAUDE.local.md — architecture, stakeholders, vendor contacts, data classification
  • PRD/*.html or PRD/*.md — security section, RBAC, NFRs, integrations
  • Data/Stakeholder-Directory.* — escalation contacts with roles and emails
  • Operational/DR-Plan*.html — recovery procedures to reference (if exists)

Step 2: Ask Discovery Questions

Only ask what can't be inferred:

  1. What constitutes an "incident" for this product? (data breach, service outage, unauthorized access, integration failure, data corruption)
  2. Who is the Incident Commander? (default: PM, but confirm)
  3. Vendor support model? (SLA response times, escalation contacts, ticket system)
  4. Legal/privilege considerations? (e.g., ProductB has legal privilege — incidents may require legal counsel)
  5. Existing Coco Inc incident process? (does the team already report through ServiceNow, Slack, etc.)

Step 3: Generate IRP Document

Output: Operational/IRP-{ProductName}-{Date}.html

Self-contained HTML with print-optimized CSS. No CDN dependencies — this document must work offline during an actual incident.

12 sections:

1. Purpose & Scope

  • Which product/instance this plan covers
  • What qualifies as an incident vs. a support request
  • Relationship to firm-wide incident process

2. Severity Classification

Build product-specific severity matrix. See references/severity-matrix.md for the framework.

Key rule: Data classification drives minimum severity.

  • Purple Data incident = auto-SEV1
  • Red Data incident = minimum SEV2
  • Yellow/Green = severity based on impact
SeverityDefinitionResponse TimeExample
SEV1 — CriticalData breach, complete service outage, legal/regulatory exposure15 minPurple Data accessed by unauthorized user
SEV2 — HighSignificant functionality loss, data integrity issue, >50% users affected1 hourIntegration failure causing data sync halt
SEV3 — MediumPartial functionality loss, workaround available, <50% users affected4 hoursSingle module unavailable, manual process possible
SEV4 — LowMinor issue, cosmetic, single-user impactNext business dayReport formatting error, UI glitch

3. Detection & Reporting

  • How incidents are typically detected (user report, monitoring, vendor notification)
  • Reporting channel (email, Slack, ServiceNow ticket)
  • What information to include when reporting

4. Escalation Matrix

  • Per-severity: who to contact, in what order, with backup contacts
  • Pull real names and emails from stakeholder directory
  • Include vendor escalation path

5. Response Procedures

  • Per-severity playbooks with triage, containment, investigation, resolution steps
  • See references/escalation-patterns.md for playbook structure

6. Communication Protocol

  • Internal (team Slack/Teams channel)
  • Stakeholder (email using /pmstudio-comms incident template)
  • Vendor (support ticket + phone for SEV1-2)
  • Leadership (when to escalate to SteerCo)
  • Per-severity: who communicates what, when, through which channel

7. Evidence Preservation

  • What to capture: screenshots, logs, timestamps, affected records
  • Where to store: incident folder in SharePoint, not in the product itself
  • Chain of custody for legal/privilege incidents

8. Resolution & Recovery

  • Handoff to DR/Recovery plan (if exists)
  • Verification steps before declaring resolved
  • Service restoration confirmation checklist

9. Post-Incident Review (PIR)

  • PIR meeting within 48 hours of resolution
  • Template: timeline, impact, root cause, contributing factors, what went well, what to improve, action items
  • PIR document stored in Meeting-Notes/PIR-{Date}-{Summary}.md

10. Roles & Responsibilities

  • Incident Commander (owns coordination)
  • Communications Lead (owns stakeholder updates)
  • Technical Lead (owns diagnosis and fix)
  • Vendor Liaison (owns vendor communication)
  • Legal Counsel (for privilege/regulatory incidents)

11. Vendor Escalation

  • Vendor support tiers and SLA response times
  • Escalation contacts (from project memory)
  • Ticket creation procedure
  • When to bypass normal support (SEV1 phone escalation)

12. Review & Maintenance

  • Review cadence: semi-annually or after any SEV1-2 incident
  • Tabletop exercise schedule: annually
  • Contact list verification: quarterly
  • Version history

Step 4: Present for Review

Show the complete plan structure with key content decisions highlighted:

  • Severity matrix with product-specific examples
  • Escalation matrix with real names
  • Any assumptions made

Ask for approval before writing the file.

Critical Rules

  1. Zero external dependencies. The HTML must render fully offline. No CDN links. During an incident, internet may be unreliable.
  2. Real contacts only. Pull names/emails from project files. Leave blanks with "[TBD — add contact]" markers rather than guessing.
  3. Legal privilege awareness. If the project involves legal privilege (like ProductB/Tax), include a section on when to involve legal counsel and how to protect privilege during incident response.
  4. Severity ties to data. Always tie severity classification to the product's data classification. Don't create a severity matrix that ignores data sensitivity.
  5. Actionable, not aspirational. Every procedure should be something the team can actually execute today with current tools and access. Don't include monitoring procedures if no monitoring exists yet.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Train and optimize AI agents using Microsoft's Agent Lightning framework with reinforcement learning. Use when setting up agent training, instrumenting agents with tracing, configuring LightningStore, implementing reward functions, or optimizing prompts with RL/APO algorithms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

coco-research/coco5582026年10月12日 更新

Post-run self-evaluation system that scores agent output on correctness, clarity, actionability, and conciseness. Use after /team runs, skill executions, or when explicitly asked to evaluate output quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

coco-research/coco5582026年10月12日 更新

Create AI marketing videos for ads, promos, product launches, and brand content. Models: Veo, Seedance, Wan, FLUX for visuals, Kokoro for voiceover. Types: product demos, testimonials, explainers, social ads, brand videos. Use for: Facebook ads, YouTube ads, product launches, brand awareness. Triggers: marketing video, ad video, promo video, commercial, brand video, product video, explainer video, ad creative, video ad, facebook ad video, youtube ad, instagram ad, tiktok ad, promotional video, launch video

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

coco-research/coco5582026年10月12日 更新

Use when building AI features into a product: LLM integration, RAG pipelines, guardrails, streaming, AI UX, prompt engineering, or AI cost control. Treats prompts as code and validates every model output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

coco-research/coco5582026年10月12日 更新

Your AI research and engineering brain trust. 59 named personas across 8 cells covering frontier labs, applied product, model architecture, reasoning/RL/agents, alignment and interpretability, theory and science of DL, multimodal and…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

coco-research/coco5582026年10月12日 更新

Use when designing a new REST or GraphQL API, reviewing an API spec before implementation, setting team API standards, or migrating REST to GraphQL. Covers resources, HTTP semantics, pagination, error handling, and pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

coco-research/coco5582026年10月12日 更新

coco-research のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する