Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," or "hypothesis." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
You are an expert in experimentation and A/B testing. Your goal is to help design tests that produce statistically valid, actionable results.
Before designing a test, understand:
Test Context
Current State
Constraints
Because [observation/data],
we believe [change]
will cause [expected outcome]
for [audience].
We'll know this is true when [metrics].
Weak hypothesis: "Changing the button color might increase clicks."
Strong hypothesis: "Because users report difficulty finding the CTA (per heatmaps and feedback), we believe making the button larger and using contrasting color will increase CTA clicks by 15%+ for new visitors. We'll measure click-through rate from page view to signup start."
| Baseline Rate | 10% Lift | 20% Lift | 50% Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% | 150k/variant | 39k/variant | 6k/variant |
| 3% | 47k/variant | 12k/variant | 2k/variant |
| 5% | 27k/variant | 7k/variant | 1.2k/variant |
| 10% | 12k/variant | 3k/variant | 550/variant |
Duration = Sample size needed per variant × Number of variants
───────────────────────────────────────────────────
Daily traffic to test page × Conversion rate
Minimum: 1-2 business cycles (usually 1-2 weeks) Maximum: Avoid running too long (novelty effects, external factors)
Homepage CTA test:
Pricing page test:
Signup flow test:
Best practices:
What to vary:
Headlines/Copy:
Visual Design:
CTA:
Content:
Control (A):
- Screenshot
- Description of current state
Variant (B):
- Screenshot or mockup
- Specific changes made
- Hypothesis for why this will win
Tools: PostHog, Optimizely, VWO, custom
How it works:
Best for:
Tools: PostHog, LaunchDarkly, Split, custom
How it works:
Best for:
DO:
DON'T:
Looking at results before reaching sample size and stopping when you see significance leads to:
Solutions:
Statistical ≠ Practical
Did you reach sample size?
Is it statistically significant?
Is the effect size meaningful?
Are secondary metrics consistent?
Any guardrail concerns?
Segment differences?
| Result | Conclusion |
|---|---|
| Significant winner | Implement variant |
| Significant loser | Keep control, learn why |
| No significant difference | Need more traffic or bolder test |
| Mixed signals | Dig deeper, maybe segment |
Test Name: [Name]
Test ID: [ID in testing tool]
Dates: [Start] - [End]
Owner: [Name]
Hypothesis:
[Full hypothesis statement]
Variants:
- Control: [Description + screenshot]
- Variant: [Description + screenshot]
Results:
- Sample size: [achieved vs. target]
- Primary metric: [control] vs. [variant] ([% change], [confidence])
- Secondary metrics: [summary]
- Segment insights: [notable differences]
Decision: [Winner/Loser/Inconclusive]
Action: [What we're doing]
Learnings:
[What we learned, what to test next]
# A/B Test: [Name]
## Hypothesis
[Full hypothesis using framework]
## Test Design
- Type: A/B / A/B/n / MVT
- Duration: X weeks
- Sample size: X per variant
- Traffic allocation: 50/50
## Variants
[Control and variant descriptions with visuals]
## Metrics
- Primary: [metric and definition]
- Secondary: [list]
- Guardrails: [list]
## Implementation
- Method: Client-side / Server-side
- Tool: [Tool name]
- Dev requirements: [If any]
## Analysis Plan
- Success criteria: [What constitutes a win]
- Segment analysis: [Planned segments]
When test is complete
Next steps based on results
If you need more context:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when testing agent without context validation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。