バックエンド実装時に使用。DRY原則遵守。コーディング規約準拠。
subagent-driven-development
Use when independent bounded tasks benefit from delegation during implementation
インストール方法を見る含まれるファイル(7)
- SKILL.md2.4 KB
- implementer-prompt.md963 B
- re-review-prompt.md568 B
- scripts/review-package2.0 KB
- scripts/sdd-workspace3.2 KB
- scripts/task-brief1.3 KB
- task-reviewer-prompt.md598 B
SKILL.md(原文)
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Subagent-Driven Development
Choose delegation by total effort: briefing, implementation, rediscovery, integration, and rework. The parent may implement or fix code directly. Do not require a particular implementation model or forbid the parent model from writing code. Select available models for task difficulty and use the runtime's actual tool contract.
Delegate only work with clear ownership, interfaces, acceptance criteria, and useful independence. Parallel tasks must not edit the same files or depend on unfinished shared state. Give each worker concise requirements, relevant source paths, the workspace, constraints, and expected verification; do not ask it to transcribe a complete implementation from a plan.
Use implementer-prompt.md as an optional brief template. The controller integrates results, resolves dependencies, and can handle a small fix itself. Workers report evidence and uncertainties; they do not launch extra reviewers. Maintain a concise progress record only when it aids resumption, using existing runtime records where available.
Run appropriate tests while implementing. After integration, use the project's independent quality-check and its review budget. There is no mandatory task-by-task review, spec/quality double review, or additional whole-branch reviewer. A targeted investigation can still be requested when a concrete unresolved concern requires another perspective; account for it in the existing review budget.
The task-brief and workspace scripts remain optional utilities for larger handoffs. Legacy task review/re-review templates are optional formats for an explicitly selected quality-check investigation, not additional gates. Do not create their ledgers, snapshots, or packages unless the chosen workflow needs them.
Workers report changed files, test evidence, deviations from the design and limitations to the controller; the controller records the deviations. Before completion, verify the integrated result; the report to the user follows the final-message rule in documents/development/development-policy.md §1.0 "承認後の進め方" (deviations from the design only; test evidence goes into the PR body). Continue integration within existing authorization and project branch policy.
レビュー
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
同じリポジトリのスキル
概要と使いどころ
Use before implementing any feature, behavior change, or refactor - settles requirements and design, then gets the design independently reviewed and approved by the user before code is written
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
作業開始時に使用。mainブランチでの作業禁止。Issue先行作成必須。
UI実装後の検証時に使用。agent-browser CLIでブラウザ上の動作を手動検証する。「UIを確認」「画面テスト」と言われたら使用(プロジェクトの E2E スイート実行は quality-check Step 5(推奨度・範囲で自動実施または確認)/ server-startup が担当)。
DBマイグレーション作成時に使用。バージョン番号競合防止。mainブランチ確認必須。
Use when independent tasks benefit from parallel work without shared state or sequential dependencies
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。