本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

android-background-task-specialist

Android background task specialist for WorkManager, Foreground Services, Doze mode, and battery optimization. Activate on: WorkManager, background task Android, Foreground Service, Doze mode, battery optimization, periodic work, background sync Android, JobScheduler. NOT for: iOS background tasks (use swiftui-data-flow-expert), React Native background (use mobile-offline-sync-architect), UI architecture (use jetpack-compose-navigation-expert).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Android Background Task Specialist

Expert in Android background execution with WorkManager, Foreground Services, Doze mode handling, and battery-efficient processing.

Activation Triggers

Activate on: "WorkManager", "background task Android", "Foreground Service", "Doze mode", "battery optimization", "periodic work", "background sync", "JobScheduler", "background processing Android"

NOT for: iOS background tasks → swiftui-data-flow-expert | React Native background → mobile-offline-sync-architect | UI architecture → jetpack-compose-navigation-expert

Quick Start

  1. Choose the right API — WorkManager for deferrable work, Foreground Service for user-visible ongoing tasks, coroutines for short async work
  2. Define workers — extend CoroutineWorker with suspend functions for clean async code
  3. Configure constraints — network type, battery level, storage requirements
  4. Handle Doze and App Standby — use WorkManager (not AlarmManager) for Doze-compatible scheduling
  5. Test with adb — force Doze mode and verify work executes when constraints are met

Core Capabilities

DomainTechnologies
Deferrable WorkWorkManager 2.10, OneTimeWorkRequest, PeriodicWorkRequest
ForegroundForeground Service types (dataSync, location, mediaPlayback, shortService)
ConstraintsNetworkType, BatteryNotLow, StorageNotLow, DeviceIdle
ChainingWorkContinuation, parallel chains, unique work policies
TestingTestWorkerBuilder, TestListenableWorkerBuilder, WorkManagerTestInitHelper

Architecture Patterns

WorkManager Decision Tree

Is the task user-initiated and needs to complete?
  ├─ YES → Is it short (< 10 min)?
  │   ├─ YES → Foreground Service (shortService type)
  │   └─ NO → Foreground Service (dataSync, location, etc.)
  │
  └─ NO → Is it deferrable?
      ├─ YES → WorkManager
      │   ├─ One-time? → OneTimeWorkRequest
      │   └─ Periodic? → PeriodicWorkRequest (min 15 min interval)
      │
      └─ NO → Is it while app is visible?
          ├─ YES → CoroutineScope (viewModelScope or lifecycleScope)
          └─ NO → You probably need WorkManager anyway

CoroutineWorker with Retry and Progress

@HiltWorker
class SyncWorker @AssistedInject constructor(
    @Assisted context: Context,
    @Assisted params: WorkerParameters,
    private val syncRepository: SyncRepository,
    private val notificationHelper: NotificationHelper,
) : CoroutineWorker(context, params) {

    override suspend fun doWork(): Result {
        // Report progress for UI observation
        setProgress(workDataOf("progress" to 0))

        return try {
            val pendingItems = syncRepository.getPendingChanges()

            pendingItems.forEachIndexed { index, item ->
                syncRepository.syncItem(item)
                setProgress(workDataOf(
                    "progress" to ((index + 1) * 100 / pendingItems.size)
                ))
            }

            Result.success(workDataOf("synced" to pendingItems.size))
        } catch (e: IOException) {
            if (runAttemptCount < 3) {
                Result.retry()  // Exponential backoff by default
            } else {
                Result.failure(workDataOf("error" to e.message))
            }
        }
    }

    override suspend fun getForegroundInfo(): ForegroundInfo {
        return ForegroundInfo(
            NOTIFICATION_ID,
            notificationHelper.createSyncNotification()
        )
    }
}

Scheduling with Constraints and Chaining

// Schedule periodic sync every 1 hour (minimum 15 min)
val syncRequest = PeriodicWorkRequestBuilder<SyncWorker>(1, TimeUnit.HOURS)
    .setConstraints(
        Constraints.Builder()
            .setRequiredNetworkType(NetworkType.CONNECTED)
            .setRequiresBatteryNotLow(true)
            .build()
    )
    .setBackoffCriteria(
        BackoffPolicy.EXPONENTIAL,
        WorkRequest.MIN_BACKOFF_MILLIS,
        TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS
    )
    .addTag("sync")
    .build()

WorkManager.getInstance(context).enqueueUniquePeriodicWork(
    "periodic-sync",
    ExistingPeriodicWorkPolicy.KEEP,  // Don't restart if already scheduled
    syncRequest
)

// Chain: download → process → upload (sequential)
WorkManager.getInstance(context)
    .beginWith(downloadWork)
    .then(processWork)
    .then(uploadWork)
    .enqueue()

Anti-Patterns

  1. AlarmManager for deferrable work — AlarmManager alarms are not Doze-compatible and drain battery. Use WorkManager which respects Doze, App Standby, and battery saver.
  2. Background Service without foreground notification — Android 12+ kills background services. Use Foreground Service with proper type declaration or WorkManager.
  3. PeriodicWork under 15 minutes — WorkManager enforces a minimum 15-minute interval. For more frequent work, use Foreground Service or coroutine with lifecycle awareness.
  4. Not declaring foreground service type — Android 14+ requires explicit foregroundServiceType in manifest. Omitting it causes SecurityException.
  5. Ignoring work observation — starting work but not showing progress to users. Observe WorkInfo via getWorkInfoByIdLiveData() or getWorkInfoByIdFlow() to update UI.

Quality Checklist

[ ] WorkManager used for deferrable background tasks (not AlarmManager)
[ ] Foreground Service declared with correct type in AndroidManifest
[ ] Constraints configured (network, battery, storage)
[ ] Retry policy with backoff for transient failures
[ ] Unique work policy set for periodic/one-time work
[ ] Work progress observable from UI
[ ] Doze mode tested via adb: `adb shell dumpsys deviceidle force-idle`
[ ] Battery optimization tested: `adb shell am set-inactive <package> true`
[ ] Workers tested with TestWorkerBuilder
[ ] Notification channels created for foreground service notifications
[ ] Work chains handle partial failure gracefully
[ ] Background work respects user's battery saver preference

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

curiositech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する