本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

developer-surface-strategist

Chooses and designs developer surfaces for an agentic product: SDK, CLI, MCP, GUI, API, webhooks, and pd tube-style listener/sender workflows. Use when deciding why a user belongs in an SDK versus CLI/MCP/GUI, planning Python SDK parity, or making agent invocation easy across languages. NOT for implementing the full SDK, generic API docs, or UI visual design.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml661 B
  • CHANGELOG.md205 B
  • examples/expected-output.md1.1 KB
  • README.md338 B
  • references/surface-decision-guide.md2.0 KB
  • references/tube-workflow-patterns.md1.5 KB
  • schemas/surface-strategy.schema.json1.7 KB
  • scripts/surface_matrix.mjs5.6 KB
  • templates/output-template.md721 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Developer Surface Strategist

Decide which developer surface should exist, why it exists, and what minimum contract makes it useful instead of just another way to call the same endpoint.

Use This For

  • Choosing between SDK, CLI, MCP, GUI, REST/API, webhooks, and background agents.
  • Explaining why someone would use an SDK instead of a CLI, MCP tool, or GUI.
  • Planning Python SDK parity for a product that already has CLI or TypeScript affordances.
  • Designing pd tube-style listener/sender workflows and code-generation briefs across languages.
  • Making agent invocation easy enough that a user can create listeners and senders without memorizing infrastructure.

Do Not Use This For

  • Implementing a full SDK or server runtime.
  • Writing exhaustive API docs after the surface has already been chosen.
  • Visual design, layout, or component polish.

Decision Process

flowchart TD
  A[Describe workflow] --> B{Who drives it?}
  B -->|Human repeats routine action| GUI[GUI or dashboard]
  B -->|Developer automates local action| CLI[CLI]
  B -->|Application embeds behavior| SDK[SDK]
  B -->|Model agent needs tool access| MCP[MCP tool]
  B -->|Service-to-service event| API[API or webhook]
  GUI & CLI & SDK & MCP & API --> C[Define shared contract]
  C --> D[Add language and onboarding parity]
  D --> E[Design receipts, examples, and tests]
  1. Name the workflow and its actor: end user, developer, model agent, background worker, or external service.
  2. Choose the primary surface by intent:
    • GUI for routine human operations and status.
    • CLI for local automation, scripts, and agent/operator emergency paths.
    • SDK for embedding Port Daddy behavior in an app, service, or library.
    • MCP for model clients that need safe tool calls.
    • API/webhooks for service integration and external systems.
  3. Define the shared contract once: message schema, auth, idempotency, receipts, errors, and telemetry.
  4. Add parity expectations by language. If Python developers are a target audience, require a Python SDK plan.
  5. For pd tube workflows, specify listener, sender, channel naming, message schema, auth, retry, receipt, and codegen targets.
  6. Use scripts/surface_matrix.mjs to generate a deterministic surface recommendation and gap list.

Output Contract

Return:

  • surfaceMatrix: workflows with primary and secondary surfaces.
  • rationale: why each surface exists and what it must not do.
  • tubeWorkflow: listener/sender contract, schema, receipt, and codegen targets.
  • sdkParity: language list, Python SDK requirement, examples, tests, and release criteria.
  • onboarding: how a new user discovers the right surface without reading the source.

Anti-Patterns

Everything Is A CLI

Novice: "Power users can run commands." Expert: Routine operator tasks need GUI affordances. CLI is for agents, scripts, and emergencies. Timeline: By 2026, agentic products must distinguish human control surfaces from automation surfaces. Detection: Signup, credentials, restart, status, or feedback require terminal commands.

SDK As Fancy API Wrapper

Novice: "An SDK is just generated REST calls." Expert: An SDK should encode workflows: auth setup, typed messages, retries, idempotency, receipts, local fixtures, and examples. Timeline: Agentic SDKs need safety defaults and workflow helpers, not only endpoint coverage. Detection: SDK plan has method names but no examples, no retry/receipt semantics, and no local test fixture.

MCP For Everything

Novice: "If a model might use it, make it MCP-only." Expert: MCP is excellent for model tool access, but applications still need SDK/API surfaces and humans still need GUI/CLI. Timeline: Modern agent systems work best when MCP is one adapter over a shared contract, not the source of truth. Detection: No non-MCP path for services, scripts, or humans.

References

FileLoad When
references/surface-decision-guide.mdNeed SDK vs CLI vs MCP vs GUI decision rules.
references/tube-workflow-patterns.mdNeed listener/sender workflow and multi-language codegen requirements.
examples/expected-output.mdNeed the shape of a finished surface matrix.
templates/output-template.mdNeed a reusable surface strategy template.
schemas/surface-strategy.schema.jsonNeed the JSON input contract for the surface matrix.
scripts/surface_matrix.mjsNeed deterministic surface recommendations and gap checks.
agents/openai.yamlNeed a subagent descriptor for delegated developer-surface strategy.
<!-- BEGIN BUNDLE INDEX (manual) -->

Skill Bundle Index

root

agents/

examples/

references/

schemas/

scripts/

templates/

<!-- END BUNDLE INDEX -->

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月8日 更新

curiositech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する