本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

event-detection-temporal-intelligence-expert

Expert in temporal event detection, spatio-temporal clustering (ST-DBSCAN), and photo context understanding. Use for detecting photo events, clustering by time/location, shareability prediction, place recognition, event significance scoring, and life event detection. Activate on 'event detection', 'temporal clustering', 'ST-DBSCAN', 'spatio-temporal', 'shareability prediction', 'place recognition', 'life events', 'photo events', 'temporal diversity'. NOT for individual photo aesthetic quality (use photo-composition-critic), color palette analysis (use color-theory-palette-harmony-expert), face recognition implementation (use photo-content-recognition-curation-expert), or basic EXIF timestamp extraction.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(7)

  • SKILL.md8.6 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md2.7 KB
  • references/event-scoring-shareability.md10.7 KB
  • references/INDEX.md627 B
  • references/place-recognition-life-events.md10.6 KB
  • references/st-dbscan-implementation.md10.9 KB
  • references/temporal-diversity-pipeline.md10.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Event Detection & Temporal Intelligence Expert

Expert in detecting meaningful events from photo collections using spatio-temporal clustering, significance scoring, and intelligent photo selection.

DECISION POINTS

ST-DBSCAN vs DeepDBSCAN Algorithm Selection

Photo corpus analysis needed?
├─ Have GPS + timestamps?
│   ├─ Same location, different activities detected? ──── DeepDBSCAN
│   │   └─ Cost tolerance: High accuracy > speed ─────── Add CLIP embeddings
│   └─ Simple time/location grouping sufficient? ────── ST-DBSCAN
│
├─ Timestamps only (no GPS)?
│   ├─ Visual similarity important? ───────────────── Temporal + CLIP clustering  
│   └─ Pure time-based events? ────────────────────── Temporal binning
│
└─ Need hierarchical events (vacation > daily > moments)?
    └─ Multi-level ST-DBSCAN cascade ─────────────────── Expanding ε thresholds

Parameter Selection Matrix

Event Typeε_spatialε_temporalmin_ptsUse Case
Indoor party50m4hr5Home gatherings
Wedding200m8hr8Venue + reception
City tour5km12hr3Tourism, exploration
Multi-day trip50km72hr10Vacation clustering
Conference1km24hr6Business events

Event Significance Threshold Decision

Computed significance score?
├─ Score ≥ 0.8? ──────── Life event candidate (birth, wedding, graduation)
├─ Score ≥ 0.6? ──────── Major memorable event  
├─ Score ≥ 0.4? ──────── Significant social gathering
├─ Score ≥ 0.2? ──────── Minor event worth keeping
└─ Score < 0.2? ──────── Daily routine, consider filtering

FAILURE MODES

Over-Clustering Syndrome

Symptoms: Every few photos become separate "events"; 50+ micro-events from one vacation Detection Rule: If >30% of events contain <5 photos AND duration <2 hours Diagnosis: ε parameters too restrictive, treating natural breaks as separate events Fix: Increase ε_temporal (2hr → 6hr) or use hierarchical clustering with larger top-level ε

Under-Clustering Collapse

Symptoms: Wedding ceremony + reception next day grouped as single event Detection Rule: If single event spans >24hr AND contains >200 photos AND location changes >5km Diagnosis: ε parameters too permissive, merging distinct occasions Fix: Reduce ε_temporal (12hr → 6hr) OR add location change detection as break condition

GPS Noise Contamination

Symptoms: Indoor event scattered across 10km radius; bathroom photos 500m from venue Detection Rule: If event location std_dev >2x expected venue size AND contains <20% outdoor photos Diagnosis: GPS drift/reflection causing false spatial spread Fix: Apply GPS smoothing filter OR increase min_pts to require more spatial consensus

Content-Blind Grouping

Symptoms: Empty venue setup photos grouped with ceremony; parking lot + wedding altar same event Detection Rule: If visual diversity within event >0.8 cosine distance AND high location precision Diagnosis: ST-DBSCAN without visual validation grouping unrelated content Fix: Switch to DeepDBSCAN with ε_visual=0.4 OR post-filter by CLIP similarity

Temporal Boundary Bleeding

Symptoms: Friday work photos grouped with Saturday family party; overnight events split at midnight Detection Rule: If event crosses date boundary AND activity types differ >0.6 semantic distance Diagnosis: Fixed temporal windows ignoring natural event boundaries Fix: Use adaptive temporal windows OR detect activity changes as natural breaks

WORKED EXAMPLES

Example 1: Wedding Event Detection

Input: 847 photos from weekend wedding, GPS enabled

photos = load_wedding_corpus("sarah_tom_wedding/")
# GPS range: Venue (40.7589, -73.9851) to Hotel (40.7505, -73.9934)  
# Time range: Fri 2pm - Sun 11am (45 hours)

Decision Process:

  1. Algorithm Choice: Multiple venues + high importance → DeepDBSCAN
  2. Parameter Selection: Wedding type → ε_spatial=200m, ε_temporal=8hr, min_pts=8
  3. Visual Threshold: Diverse wedding activities → ε_visual=0.5

Expert vs Novice Decisions:

  • Novice miss: Would use single ε_temporal=24hr, grouping rehearsal dinner with ceremony
  • Expert catch: Detects natural breaks (rehearsal→ceremony→reception) using CLIP similarity drops

Results:

Event 1: Rehearsal Dinner (Fri 6pm-10pm, 34 photos)
Event 2: Getting Ready (Sat 10am-2pm, 89 photos) 
Event 3: Ceremony (Sat 2pm-4pm, 156 photos)
Event 4: Reception (Sat 5pm-11pm, 203 photos)
Noise: Travel/hotel photos (47 photos)

Example 2: Parameter Trade-off Analysis

Scenario: 10,000 photo family corpus, computational budget constraints

Trade-off Decision:

  • ST-DBSCAN: 2.1sec processing, 85% event accuracy, 12 false merges
  • DeepDBSCAN: 47sec processing, 94% event accuracy, 3 false merges

Decision Factors:

  • Real-time requirement? → ST-DBSCAN
  • Batch processing + accuracy critical? → DeepDBSCAN
  • Hybrid: ST-DBSCAN with DeepDBSCAN refinement on high-significance events

Expert Insight: Cost/accuracy inflection point at ~5,000 photos where CLIP embedding overhead becomes worthwhile.

QUALITY GATES

Event detection task complete when ALL conditions met:

  • Every photo assigned to event cluster OR explicitly marked as noise (-1 label)
  • No event spans >48 hours without explicit multi-day justification
  • No single-photo events (unless min_pts=1 explicitly chosen for outlier detection)
  • Event significance scores computed and >0.8 flagged for life event analysis
  • GPS coordinate outliers (>3 std_dev from event centroid) investigated for noise
  • Visual diversity within events <0.7 cosine distance (if using DeepDBSCAN)
  • Temporal gaps >6 hours within events have activity continuity justification
  • Parameter choices documented with rationale (indoor/outdoor, event type)
  • Processing time <5sec per 1000 photos (performance requirement)
  • Event hierarchy validated if multi-level clustering applied

NOT-FOR BOUNDARIES

Do NOT use this skill for:

  • Individual photo quality assessment → Use photo-composition-critic instead
  • Color scheme analysis for events → Use color-theory-palette-harmony-expert instead
  • Face recognition/clustering → Use photo-content-recognition-curation-expert first, then apply event detection
  • EXIF timestamp extraction → Basic file parsing, not event intelligence
  • Single photo context → This skill requires photo collections (>10 photos minimum)
  • Real-time photo stream processing → Designed for batch corpus analysis
  • Geographic route planning → Use mapping services; this extracts events from completed trips
  • Social graph analysis → This handles temporal/spatial clustering, not relationship mapping

Delegation patterns:

  • For photo aesthetic quality within events → photo-composition-critic
  • For face-based event grouping → First photo-content-recognition-curation-expert, then this skill
  • For collage layout of detected events → collage-layout-expert
  • For color harmony across event photos → color-theory-palette-harmony-expert

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

curiositech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する