本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

github-actions-pipeline-builder

Build production CI/CD pipelines with GitHub Actions. Implements matrix builds, caching, deployments, testing, security scanning. Use for automated testing, deployments, release workflows. Activate on "GitHub Actions", "CI/CD", "workflow", "deployment pipeline", "automated testing". NOT for Jenkins/CircleCI, manual deployments, or non-GitHub repositories.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md10.6 KB
  • assets/workflows/full-stack-ci-cd.yml4.2 KB
  • references/advanced-caching.md8.9 KB
  • scripts/action_usage_analyzer.ts7.2 KB
  • scripts/workflow_validator.ts7.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

GitHub Actions Pipeline Builder

Expert in building production-grade CI/CD pipelines with GitHub Actions that are fast, reliable, and secure.

When to Use

✅ Use for:

  • Automated testing on every commit
  • Deployment to staging/production
  • Docker image building and publishing
  • Release automation with versioning
  • Security scanning and dependency audits
  • Code quality checks (linting, type checking)
  • Multi-environment workflows

❌ NOT for:

  • Non-GitHub repositories (use Jenkins, CircleCI, etc.)
  • Complex pipelines better suited for dedicated CI/CD tools
  • Self-hosted runners (covered in advanced patterns)

Quick Decision Tree

Does your project need:
├── Testing on every PR? → GitHub Actions
├── Automated deployments? → GitHub Actions
├── Matrix builds (Node 16, 18, 20)? → GitHub Actions
├── Secrets management? → GitHub Actions secrets
├── Multi-cloud deployments? → GitHub Actions + OIDC
└── Sub-second builds? → Consider build caching

Technology Selection

GitHub Actions vs Alternatives

Why GitHub Actions in 2024:

  • Native integration: No third-party setup
  • Free for public repos: 2000 minutes/month for private
  • Matrix builds: Test multiple versions in parallel
  • Marketplace: 10,000+ pre-built actions
  • OIDC support: Keyless cloud deployments

Timeline:

  • 2019: GitHub Actions released
  • 2020: Became standard for OSS projects
  • 2022: OIDC support for secure cloud auth
  • 2024: De facto CI/CD for GitHub repos

When to Use Alternatives

ScenarioUseWhy
Self-hosted GitLabGitLab CINative integration
Complex enterprise workflowsJenkinsMore flexible
Bitbucket reposBitbucket PipelinesNative integration
Extremely large repos (>10GB)BuildKiteBetter for monorepos

Common Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern 1: No Dependency Caching

Novice thinking: "Install dependencies fresh every time for consistency"

Problem: Wastes 2-5 minutes per build installing unchanged dependencies.

Wrong approach:

# ❌ Slow: Downloads all dependencies every run
- name: Install dependencies
  run: npm install

Correct approach:

# ✅ Fast: Cache dependencies, only download changes
- name: Cache node_modules
  uses: actions/cache@v3
  with:
    path: ~/.npm
    key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}
    restore-keys: |
      ${{ runner.os }}-node-

- name: Install dependencies
  run: npm ci  # Faster than npm install

Impact: Reduces install time from 3 minutes → 30 seconds.

Timeline:

  • Pre-2020: Most workflows had no caching
  • 2020+: Caching became standard
  • 2024: Setup actions include built-in caching

Anti-Pattern 2: Duplicate YAML (No Matrix Builds)

Problem: Copy-paste workflows for different Node versions.

Wrong approach:

# ❌ Duplicated workflows
jobs:
  test-node-16:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: 16
      - run: npm test

  test-node-18:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: 18
      - run: npm test

  test-node-20:
    # ... same steps again

Correct approach:

# ✅ DRY: Matrix build
jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    strategy:
      matrix:
        node-version: [16, 18, 20]
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }}
          cache: 'npm'
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm test

Benefits: 66% less YAML, tests run in parallel.


Anti-Pattern 3: Secrets in Code

Problem: Hardcoded API keys, tokens visible in repo.

Symptoms: Security scanner alerts, leaked credentials.

Correct approach:

# ✅ Use GitHub Secrets
- name: Deploy to production
  env:
    API_KEY: ${{ secrets.PRODUCTION_API_KEY }}
    AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY }}
  run: |
    ./deploy.sh

Setting secrets:

  1. Repo Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions
  2. New repository secret
  3. Name: PRODUCTION_API_KEY, Value: sk-...

Timeline:

  • Pre-2022: Some teams committed .env files
  • 2022+: GitHub secret scanning blocks commits with keys
  • 2024: OIDC eliminates need for long-lived credentials

Anti-Pattern 4: No Failure Notifications

Problem: CI fails silently, team doesn't notice for hours.

Correct approach:

# ✅ Slack notification on failure
- name: Notify on failure
  if: failure()
  uses: slackapi/slack-github-action@v1
  with:
    payload: |
      {
        "text": "❌ Build failed: ${{ github.event.head_commit.message }}",
        "blocks": [
          {
            "type": "section",
            "text": {
              "type": "mrkdwn",
              "text": "*Build Failed*\n<${{ github.server_url }}/${{ github.repository }}/actions/runs/${{ github.run_id }}|View logs>"
            }
          }
        ]
      }
  env:
    SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL: ${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK }}

Anti-Pattern 5: Running All Tests on Every Commit

Problem: Slow feedback loop (10+ minute test suites).

Symptom: Developers avoid committing frequently.

Correct approach:

# ✅ Fast feedback: Run subset on PR, full suite on merge
on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  quick-tests:
    if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: npm run test:unit  # Fast: 2 minutes

  full-tests:
    if: github.event_name == 'push'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: npm run test  # Slow: 10 minutes (unit + integration + e2e)

Alternative: Use changed-files action to run only affected tests.


Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Basic CI Pipeline

name: CI

on:
  push:
    branches: [main]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
      - name: Checkout code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3

      - name: Setup Node.js
        uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: 18
          cache: 'npm'

      - name: Install dependencies
        run: npm ci

      - name: Run linter
        run: npm run lint

      - name: Run type check
        run: npm run typecheck

      - name: Run tests
        run: npm test

      - name: Build
        run: npm run build

Pattern 2: Multi-Environment Deployment

name: Deploy

on:
  push:
    branches:
      - main        # → staging
      - production  # → production

jobs:
  deploy:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    environment: ${{ github.ref_name }}  # staging or production

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3

      - name: Deploy to ${{ github.ref_name }}
        run: |
          if [ "${{ github.ref_name }}" == "production" ]; then
            ./deploy.sh production
          else
            ./deploy.sh staging
          fi
        env:
          API_KEY: ${{ secrets.API_KEY }}
          DATABASE_URL: ${{ secrets.DATABASE_URL }}

Pattern 3: Release Automation

name: Release

on:
  push:
    tags:
      - 'v*'  # Trigger on version tags (v1.0.0)

jobs:
  release:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      contents: write  # Required for creating releases

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3

      - name: Build artifacts
        run: npm run build

      - name: Create GitHub Release
        uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v1
        with:
          files: |
            dist/**
          body: |
            ## What's Changed
            See CHANGELOG.md for details.
        env:
          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

      - name: Publish to npm
        run: npm publish
        env:
          NODE_AUTH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}

Pattern 4: Docker Build & Push

name: Docker

on:
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  build-and-push:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3

      - name: Set up Docker Buildx
        uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v2

      - name: Login to DockerHub
        uses: docker/login-action@v2
        with:
          username: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME }}
          password: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_TOKEN }}

      - name: Build and push
        uses: docker/build-push-action@v4
        with:
          context: .
          push: true
          tags: |
            myapp:latest
            myapp:${{ github.sha }}
          cache-from: type=gha
          cache-to: type=gha,mode=max

Production Checklist

□ Dependency caching configured
□ Matrix builds for multiple versions
□ Secrets stored in GitHub Secrets (not code)
□ Failure notifications (Slack, email, etc.)
□ Deploy previews for pull requests
□ Staging → Production promotion workflow
□ Release automation with versioning
□ Docker layer caching enabled
□ CODEOWNERS file for required reviews
□ Branch protection rules enabled
□ Status checks required before merge
□ Security scanning (Dependabot, CodeQL)

When to Use vs Avoid

ScenarioUse GitHub Actions?
GitHub-hosted repo✅ Yes
Need matrix builds✅ Yes
Deploying to AWS/GCP/Azure✅ Yes (with OIDC)
GitLab repo❌ No - use GitLab CI
Extremely large monorepo⚠️ Maybe - consider BuildKite
Need GUI pipeline builder❌ No - use Jenkins/Azure DevOps

References

  • /references/advanced-caching.md - Cache strategies for faster builds
  • /references/oidc-deployments.md - Keyless cloud authentication
  • /references/security-hardening.md - Security best practices

Scripts

  • scripts/workflow_validator.ts - Validate YAML syntax locally
  • scripts/action_usage_analyzer.ts - Find outdated actions

Assets

  • assets/workflows/ - Ready-to-use workflow templates

This skill guides: CI/CD pipelines | GitHub Actions workflows | Matrix builds | Caching | Deployments | Release automation

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Apply normative BDI reasoning to agents that must detect norms, choose which commitments to internalize, and resolve conflicts by comparing consequences. Use when obligations, prohibitions, or policies collide in autonomous systems. NOT for simple fixed-priority rules, pure constraint satisfaction, or domains where no real normative conflict exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

curiositech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する