本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

Collision-Zone Thinking

Force unrelated concepts together to discover emergent properties - "What if we treated X like Y?"

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Collision-Zone Thinking

Overview

Revolutionary insights come from forcing unrelated concepts to collide. Treat X like Y and see what emerges.

Core principle: Deliberate metaphor-mixing generates novel solutions.

Quick Reference

Stuck OnTry Treating AsMight Discover
Code organizationDNA/geneticsMutation testing, evolutionary algorithms
Service architectureLego bricksComposable microservices, plug-and-play
Data managementWater flowStreaming, data lakes, flow-based systems
Request handlingPostal mailMessage queues, async processing
Error handlingCircuit breakersFault isolation, graceful degradation
AuthorizationBorder controlZero-trust, least privilege, audit logs
CachingHuman memoryForgetting curves, tiered memory (L1/L2/L3)

Process

  1. Pick two unrelated concepts from different domains
  2. Force combination: "What if we treated [A] like [B]?"
  3. Explore emergent properties: What new capabilities appear?
  4. Test boundaries: Where does the metaphor break?
  5. Extract insight: What did we learn?

Example Collision

Problem: Complex distributed system with cascading failures

Collision: "What if we treated services like electrical circuits?"

Emergent properties:

  • Circuit breakers (disconnect on overload)
  • Fuses (one-time failure protection)
  • Ground faults (error isolation)
  • Load balancing (current distribution)

Where it works: Preventing cascade failures Where it breaks: Circuits don't have retry logic Insight gained: Failure isolation patterns from electrical engineering

Best Source Domains for Collisions

  • Physics (thermodynamics, electrical, fluid dynamics)
  • Biology (evolution, immune system, neural networks)
  • Economics (supply/demand, markets, incentives)
  • Psychology (cognitive load, memory, attention)
  • Urban planning (traffic flow, zoning, infrastructure)

Red Flags You Need This

  • "I've tried everything in this domain"
  • Solutions feel incremental, not breakthrough
  • Stuck in conventional thinking
  • Need innovation, not optimization

Remember

  • Wild combinations often yield best insights
  • Test metaphor boundaries rigorously
  • Document even failed collisions (they teach)
  • The goal is insight extraction, not perfect metaphor

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Build robust backend systems — APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), databases, performance optimization, security (OWASP Top 10), scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), and testing. Use when designing APIs, implementing auth, optimizing queries, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

caveman

無料

Terse output mode — strips filler/articles/hedging, ~75% token reduction. Activate whenever: context is filling up, user says be brief/terse/caveman/less tokens, or CAVEMAN_TRIGGERED appears in context. Persists every response until CAVEMAN_RELEASED or user says stop/normal mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

ck-cook

無料

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

ck-fix

無料

Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

ck-plan

無料

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

DangQuangSE のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する