本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

gsd:forensics

Post-mortem investigation for failed GSD workflows — analyzes git history, artifacts, and state to diagnose what went wrong

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<objective> Investigate what went wrong during a GSD workflow execution. Analyzes git history, `.planning/` artifacts, and file system state to detect anomalies and generate a structured diagnostic report.

Purpose: Diagnose failed or stuck workflows so the user can understand root cause and take corrective action. Output: Forensic report saved to .planning/forensics/, presented inline, with optional issue creation. </objective>

<execution_context> @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/forensics.md </execution_context>

<context> **Data sources:** - `git log` (recent commits, patterns, time gaps) - `git status` / `git diff` (uncommitted work, conflicts) - `.planning/STATE.md` (current position, session history) - `.planning/ROADMAP.md` (phase scope and progress) - `.planning/phases/*/` (PLAN.md, SUMMARY.md, VERIFICATION.md, CONTEXT.md) - `.planning/reports/SESSION_REPORT.md` (last session outcomes)

User input:

  • Problem description: $ARGUMENTS (optional — will ask if not provided) </context>
<process> Read and execute the forensics workflow from @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/forensics.md end-to-end. </process>

<success_criteria>

  • Evidence gathered from all available data sources
  • At least 4 anomaly types checked (stuck loop, missing artifacts, abandoned work, crash/interruption)
  • Structured forensic report written to .planning/forensics/report-{timestamp}.md
  • Report presented inline with findings, anomalies, and recommendations
  • Interactive investigation offered for deeper analysis
  • GitHub issue creation offered if actionable findings exist </success_criteria>

<critical_rules>

  • Read-only investigation: Do not modify project source files during forensics. Only write the forensic report and update STATE.md session tracking.
  • Redact sensitive data: Strip absolute paths, API keys, tokens from reports and issues.
  • Ground findings in evidence: Every anomaly must cite specific commits, files, or state data.
  • No speculation without evidence: If data is insufficient, say so — do not fabricate root causes. </critical_rules>

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Automate ActiveCampaign tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage contacts, tags, list subscriptions, automation enrollment, and tasks. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

davepoon/buildwithclaude3,6202026年10月10日 更新

Analytics your AI agent can actually use. Track, analyze, run A/B experiments, and optimize across all your projects via CLI. Includes a growth playbook so your agent knows HOW to grow, not just what to track.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

davepoon/buildwithclaude3,6202026年10月10日 更新

Teaches when to recall from long-term memory before acting and when to save durable decisions, corrections and failures afterwards. Use when a memory tool or MCP memory server is connected but the agent is not using it consistently, when the user complains that the assistant forgets preferences, conventions or past decisions between sessions, or when setting up persistent memory for a project. Works with any memory backend: a folder of Markdown files, a local MCP server, or a managed service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

davepoon/buildwithclaude3,6202026年10月10日 更新

Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tokens, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

davepoon/buildwithclaude3,6202026年10月10日 更新

Audit whether a website can be found, crawled, and cited by AI answer engines such as ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Microsoft Copilot. Use when someone asks why their brand is missing from AI answers, whether AI crawlers can read their site, how to get cited by ChatGPT or Perplexity, or asks for a GEO or AEO (generative / answer engine optimization) review. Produces a citation baseline across buyer-intent prompts, a crawler-access check, a citability review of named pages, and a ranked fix list. Not for keyword rank tracking, paid search, or pages behind a login.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

davepoon/buildwithclaude3,6202026年10月10日 更新

Automate Airtable tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): records, bases, tables, fields, views. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

davepoon/buildwithclaude3,6202026年10月10日 更新

davepoon のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する