Route CEO-first multi-window work into owner-led role loops. Use for 总控/CEO、架构/CTO、内容主编、角色派发与复用、模型路由、来源窗口回调、role-windows 台账、skill 命中统计或 multi-window loop engineering。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and optimize a skill system with evidence. Use for skill architecture, token or context waste, role and prompt boundaries, routing hits or misfires, plugin packaging, registry/docs/source drift, duplicate workflows, or deciding whether a reusable change belongs in a skill. Runs deterministic checks first and applies only authorized, minimal fixes.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Treat the skill system as a maintained product: measure discoverability, routing, context cost, ownership, generated bundles, documentation, and validation before changing it. This skill is the standard workflow for the existing 技能维护 role; it does not create another role.
When invoked, start with the baseline audit. Do not ask the user to choose a checklist and do not assume that every review must produce a change.
git status, registry/package ownership, and the relevant role/skill contracts.python skills/skill-system-governance/scripts/audit_skill_system.py --repo . --mode quick
references/audit-dimensions.md only for the dimensions relevant to the task.Static checks prove structure, not runtime selection quality. When the user supplies observed routing decisions or callback artifacts, run:
python skills/skill-system-governance/scripts/audit_skill_system.py \
--repo . --mode quick \
--observed path/to/observed-routing.jsonl \
--callbacks path/to/callback-a.md \
--callbacks path/to/callback-b.md
Without those artifacts, report routing accuracy and skill-hit rate as not_evaluable. Never convert self-reported callbacks into observed router accuracy or claim a percentage from chat memory.
For explicitly authorized local lifecycle observation, read references/local-observation.md and use the opt-in installer. It preserves existing hooks and requires native hook trust; metadata snapshots do not prove skill selection, task quality, or membership savings.
Choose one primary verdict:
no-change: evidence does not justify a change.docs-only: implementation is sound but discoverability or guidance drifted.routing: trigger descriptions, role ownership, eval cases, or package selection need correction.contract-script: repeated ambiguity needs a deterministic field, enum, guard, or validator.package: Core/domain boundaries or context budgets need adjustment.consolidate-deprecate: duplicate or obsolete workflows should merge, downgrade, or retire.Order findings by severity and leverage. For each finding, include evidence, causal mechanism, smallest useful change, and a validation path. Separate measured facts from inference.
If the user asked only for an audit, stop after the verdict and recommendations. If the user authorized optimization:
skills/, registry/, docs/, evals/, or scripts/.plugins/*/skills/ copies directly.python scripts/sync_plugin_bundles.py --write after canonical changes.python skills/skill-system-governance/scripts/audit_skill_system.py --repo . --mode full
.codex/role-windows.md into the shared repository.**Verdict**
no-change / docs-only / routing / contract-script / package / consolidate-deprecate
**Evidence**
- Deterministic checks:
- Runtime evidence:
- Not evaluable:
**Findings**
| Priority | Finding | Evidence | Smallest Change | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
**Decision**
- Apply now / defer / no change
- Scope and non-goals
**Verification**
- Commands and results
**Residual Risk**
- Remaining uncertainty
Keep a clean audit concise. Expand only findings that change a decision.
scripts/audit_skill_system.py: deterministic read-only quick/full audit and optional runtime-evidence aggregation.references/audit-dimensions.md: scoped architecture, routing, Token, packaging, lifecycle, and documentation review criteria.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Route CEO-first multi-window work into owner-led role loops. Use for 总控/CEO、架构/CTO、内容主编、角色派发与复用、模型路由、来源窗口回调、role-windows 台账、skill 命中统计或 multi-window loop engineering。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only first workflow for diagnosing application incidents by collecting service, log, network, configuration, and functional evidence before proposing any fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run user-authorized black-box web security tests and evidence-based reports. Use for 黑盒安全测试、渗透测试、数据泄露、未授权访问、公开 JS/API、登录爆破防护、CORS 或安全响应头检查。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose the narrowest reliable browser surface across Codex Browser, signed-in Chrome, Playwright CLI, and platform scripts. Use for browser automation, logged-in workflows, UI inspection, screenshots, form filling, publish previews, or frontend QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
提议并执行 rubric 或 bucket 升级。两种模式:**完整 rubric bump**(最高风险动作,5 步强制 + 跨模型审核)和 **--bucket-only 轻量重校**(只换 bucket 边界,不动 rubric 公式)。**Phase 2 强制走 cheat-score-blind sub-agent 给校准池重打分**——不接受 self-scored fallback。触发词:"升级 rubric"/"bump rubric"/"更新公式"/"我想加一个维度"/"调整权重"/"重校桶"/"recalibrate bucket"。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
初始化 cheat-on-content 内容校准工作区。仅在用户明确开始该工作流,或其子 skill 确认缺少 .cheat-state.json 时使用;不响应一般项目初始化、安装诊断或 Codex 首次会话。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。