本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

rootnode-session-handoff

Produces structured markdown session continuation documents for multi-session workflows. Captures active work streams, decisions with rationale, knowledge-file deltas learned during the session, the exact files to load next conversation, ingested content, artifacts, and open items into an ingestion-optimized handoff. Carries pending KF updates and unresolved items forward across handoff chains so context never drops. Generates a closeout checklist and echoes the starter prompt to chat. Use when approaching context limits, wrapping up a session, or managing work across conversations. Trigger on: "create a handoff," "session closeout," "wrap up this session," "build session handoff," "BSH," "continue next session," "we're running out of context," "context is getting long." Do NOT use for Memory optimization, context budget analysis, project audits, deciding whether work is ready for autonomous/Claude Code execution (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), or summaries with no continuation intent.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md15.5 KB
  • references/closeout-checklist.md7.2 KB
  • references/handoff-template.md11.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Session Handoff

Calibration: Tier 1 (Model-compatible) - runs cleanly on the current dual-primary tier (Opus 5, Sonnet 5) as well as Haiku 4.5 with extended thinking. Structured retrieval, rule evaluation, or template lookup - output shape does not depend on model class. Correct-shape output also on Opus 4.8 (fallback-graceful) and Sonnet 4.6 (legacy-graceful). See repository README for model compatibility.

Version 2.0: Markdown output (was XML). Adds forced knowledge-file delta capture, a files-to-load-next-conversation list split by track, a chat echo of the starter prompt and load list, datetime-stamped naming with a Handoff Card, a completeness gate, and a carry-forward ledger that survives long handoff chains. v1.0 capture discipline preserved.

Produce a markdown session continuation document when multi-session work needs a clean breakpoint. The document is the next session's only inheritance from this one — it carries active tracks, decisions, knowledge gained, the files to reload, and open items so work resumes immediately instead of being re-derived.

Important

The handoff is everything the next session gets. The next session's Claude has no access to this conversation. Anything that matters lives in the handoff document or a persistent store (Memory, knowledge files, delivered files). Conversation-only content goes in the document at full fidelity, or it is lost.

These are gates. Each runs every handoff; skipping any produces a broken artifact:

  • Knowledge-file deltas are never silent. Every handoff evaluates what the session learned that belongs in a knowledge file and emits drop-in KF blocks — or states KF deltas this session: none — confirmed. Absence is a deliberate, stated output, never an omission. This is the v2.0 headline: context gained in a session must reach the KFs, not evaporate.
  • Decisions carry rationale. A decision logged as "chose X" forces the next session to follow blindly or re-derive. Capture the why and the implications. This is the #1 continuity failure.
  • The completeness gate runs before emit. Verify every stream, decision, KF-delta evaluation, load list, carry-forward inheritance, and the starter prompt before finalizing. The gate is the backstop against silent drops.
  • Output is markdown. Always. Structured markdown parses reliably and stays human-readable for direct review. Preserve the section schema and the status vocabulary; never substitute freeform structure.
  • Each handoff is a snapshot, not a log. Continuing from a prior handoff replaces it. Unresolved items and pending KF deltas carry forward explicitly through the ledger. The document never grows by appending.

What the handoff must achieve

A correct handoff satisfies four outcomes. The method below is the reliable path to them, not a checklist to recite — lead with the outcome, let the steps serve it.

  1. Complete capture. Every active work stream, decision, and piece of conversation-only knowledge is present at full fidelity.
  2. Persistence-correct. Content that lives in a persistent store is referenced, not duplicated; content that exists only in this conversation is captured in full.
  3. Forward-carrying. Pending KF deltas and unresolved open items from this session and any predecessor survive into the next handoff until applied or resolved.
  4. Ingestion-optimized. Dense, specific, state-over-history, consistently structured, fast for the next session to act on.

How to get there

The method that reliably hits those outcomes:

Inventory the session. Catalog objectives, every activity track (starting state, progress, current state, next steps), decisions with rationale, uploaded content (working understanding, not raw text), conversation-only knowledge (most at-risk — exists nowhere else), artifacts, and open items. If continuing a chain, pull the predecessor's pending KF deltas and unresolved items.

Assess against the persistence test. For each item: if the next session's Claude wouldn't have it without this document, it goes in at full fidelity; otherwise it becomes a reference pointer. Memory edits → reference. Knowledge files → reference by name. Delivered files → reference path + {code}_ name. Conversation-only → full fidelity.

Evaluate KF deltas (gate). Separately from session progress, ask: what did this session learn or change that updates context for future sessions — methodology, principle, decision rationale, taxonomy, threshold, convention? Each qualifying item becomes a drop-in KF block (target file + section, action, the block, rationale), tagged with status and origin. If nothing qualifies, state it explicitly. Read references/handoff-template.md for the block format.

Structure to the schema. Organize into the markdown sections in references/handoff-template.md, leading with the Handoff Card. Apply ingestion optimization: density over prose, specific over summary, state over history (except rejected alternatives, which prevent re-proposal), consistent structure, re-upload flags on every ingested file.

Produce and verify. Output the handoff as a downloadable markdown file. Run the completeness gate. Produce the closeout checklist in conversation (read references/closeout-checklist.md). Echo the starter prompt and files-to-load list into the chat.

Naming and the Handoff Card

Filename: {code}_SH_{MMDDYY-HHMM}_{theme-slug}.md — e.g. root_SH_062426-1430_skill-calibration.md.

  • {code} is the project code; if not yet established, ask once, then it is known.
  • {MMDDYY-HHMM} is the datetime; chronological sort equals build order, so it is the unique sequence key — no integer is needed and none is written, which removes the duplication risk a manual counter would carry.
  • {theme-slug} is 1–3 words, lowercase, hyphenated, capturing the session theme.
  • Same-minute collision appends -2. A re-issued or corrected handoff for the same session appends _v2 to the stem; versioning disambiguates revisions, not order.

Handoff Card — the first block of the document body, ~5 lines, glanceable, ID matching the filename stem:

root · SH 062426-1430 · skill-calibration · v1
Reach-back: Self-contained
Carry-forward: 2 KF deltas pending, 1 open item carried
Advances: 4.8 alignment | session-handoff redesign

The reach-back line names the minimum predecessors needed to reconstruct this handoff (Self-contained, or Requires SH 062326-0900, …). When a stack of handoffs is loaded, chronological order of the datetime IDs is build order; orient by ID and reach-back rather than any written ordinal. Full card and reach-back rules: references/handoff-template.md.

The forward-carry mechanism

KF deltas and open items each carry a status (pending / applied / resolved) and an origin (the datetime ID of the handoff where they first appeared). When continuing a chain, inherit all still-pending KF deltas and unresolved open items from the predecessor(s), preserving origin — applied and resolved items drop out, so the ledger self-prunes. This is what makes "context never silently drops" hold across a 20-handoff chain, not just one hop. Flag any item carried across 2+ handoffs: stale (remove) or blocked (escalate).

Files to load next conversation

Distinct from project knowledge files (loaded into the Project, not the chat) and from per-source re-upload flags. List the conversation files needed to resume, split by track and by necessity — a "required to continue (all tracks)" group plus per-track groups marking each file required or optional. Derive from each track's next steps: which files do those steps depend on? Format: references/handoff-template.md.

Chat echo

After delivering the handoff file and the closeout checklist, post to the current chat, copy-paste-ready: the starter prompt (fenced) and the files-to-load list. Both also live in the handoff; the echo exists so the next conversation launches fast without opening the handoff first.

Proactive vs. requested

Requested ("wrap up," "create a handoff," "BSH"): full method at full depth. Finish in-flight deliverables that complete quickly first; thoroughness is the priority.

Proactive (context pressure ~70%): same outcomes and gates, urgency-aware execution. Inventory prioritizes in-flight over completed work; assess whether near-complete items (under ~10% of remaining budget) finish first; the document leads with active-track state and next steps, compresses completed work; the Card notes estimated remaining context. The KF-delta and completeness gates still run — pressure is not a reason to drop them.

Conventions

Recommended patterns, not platform requirements — adopt where they fit.

  • Institutional memory file: if the project maintains a build_context.md or equivalent, the closeout assesses whether it needs updating and what. KF deltas captured in the handoff are often the source of that update.
  • Propagation: if the session changed system-wide facts, flag propagation items so downstream references stay in sync. KF deltas are a first-class propagation vehicle.
  • Phase-gated work: capture current phase, objectives, within-phase progress; cross-phase sessions document both.
  • Cross-project artifacts: flag with the target project name in artifacts and as an explicit open item.
  • Terse starter prompts: match the user's style; reference the handoff file, state the first action, done.
  • Cloud storage as canonical: reference paths/URIs for files stored outside the conversation; note the delivery output path.

Examples

Example 1 — Single track, clean break, with a KF delta

A 2-hour Skill-design session. "Wrap this up."

Inventory: one track (Skill design), three decisions with rationale, no uploads, several conversation-only design-rationale items, one delivered spec file. Assess: spec file delivered → reference; decisions and rationale → full fidelity. KF-delta evaluation: the session established a reusable naming convention that future sessions must follow → one KF block (target: build_context.md › conventions, action ADD, the block, rationale), status pending, origin this handoff. Structure: Card, one track IN_PROGRESS, three decisions, one KF delta, one artifact, two open items, files-to-load (the spec, required), starter prompt. Produce + verify gate + echo.

Result: {code}_SH_062426-1610_skill-design.md. The naming convention reaches the KFs instead of living only in the dead conversation.

Example 2 — Continuing a chain, carry-forward in action

Session 3 in a chain. The prior handoff left 2 pending KF deltas and 1 unresolved open item; this session applied 1 delta and resolved nothing.

Inventory pulls the predecessor's ledger. Carry-forward: the 1 still-pending KF delta re-surfaces with its original origin ID; the applied delta drops; the unresolved open item carries with its origin; this session adds 1 new delta. The item now carried across 3 handoffs is flagged — escalate or remove. Reach-back: this handoff integrated the predecessor's still-relevant decisions, so Self-contained; had it left a large ingested-content summary in the predecessor, it would name it.

Result: nothing from three sessions back falls through; the ledger shows exactly what is still pending and where each item originated.

Example 3 — Proactive trigger

Context pressure ~70%. Two tracks, one ~80% done, one ~30%. The ~80% track needs ~5% of remaining budget — finish it first, then run the method. Document leads with the 30% track at full detail, compresses the completed one. KF-delta and completeness gates still run. Starter prompt focuses on the 30% track; Card notes remaining context.

When to Use This Skill

Use when approaching context limits and continuing in a new session, wrapping up a session with intent to continue, managing multi-track work across conversation boundaries, or when context pressure hits ~70% and in-flight work cannot complete.

Do NOT use for optimizing Memory content (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available), analyzing context budget (use rootnode-context-budget if available), auditing project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available), deciding whether work is ready for autonomous/Claude Code execution (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check if available), summarizing with no continuation intent, or when work is fully complete with no pending items.

Troubleshooting

Next session doesn't resume cleanly: starter prompt too vague, or conversation-only knowledge was summarized instead of captured at full fidelity. The prompt must name the handoff file, state the first action, and orient to the project.

Decisions get re-litigated: rationale missing or thin. Capture the reasoning, the implications, and any rejected alternative so it isn't re-proposed.

Context gained in a session never reaches the KFs: the KF-delta gate was skipped or produced an empty result without the explicit confirmation line. Every handoff emits blocks or none — confirmed. If deltas exist, they belong in the handoff body with status and origin, not only flagged in the closeout.

Items fall through across sessions: carry-forward inheritance didn't run. When continuing a chain, inherit all pending KF deltas and unresolved items with origin preserved. Check the ledger.

Handoff numbering or order is ambiguous: rely on the datetime ID, not a written count — chronological order of {MMDDYY-HHMM} is build order. Use _v2 only for a re-issue of the same handoff.

Uploaded file content lost between sessions: re-upload flag wrong, or the key-content summary too thin. Capture every fact, constraint, or data point that influenced the work.

Handoff too long for the next context: too much completed-work detail. Compress completed tracks to final state; the next session needs current state and next steps.

Reference table

ReferenceWhen to read
references/handoff-template.mdThe markdown schema — all section formats, status vocabulary, Handoff Card, KF-delta block, files-to-load, carry-forward ledger, reach-back, naming. Read when structuring and producing.
references/closeout-checklist.mdThe closeout checklist delivered in chat — Memory update patterns, build_context assessment, propagation (KF deltas as vehicle), chain handling, cross-project items, chat echo, completeness line. Read at produce.

End of SKILL.md.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Detects seven structural anti-patterns in Claude Projects that cause unpredictable output, ignored instructions, and degraded quality. Diagnoses Monolith, Orphan File, Echo Chamber, Phantom Conversation, Kitchen Sink, Misaligned Hierarchy, and Blurred Layers. Use when user says "what's wrong with my project," "Claude ignores my instructions," "diagnose my project," "why is output inconsistent," "review my project setup." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "Claude doesn't follow my rules," "my instructions keep getting overridden," "my Project isn't behaving as designed." Use alongside rootnode-project-audit if available for deeper structural analysis. Activate whenever the user describes symptoms of unreliable, inconsistent, or degraded Claude Project output, even if they do not name a specific pattern. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is Memory-layer rebalancing (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available) or scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

drayline/rootnode-skills402026年9月14日 更新

Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

drayline/rootnode-skills402026年9月14日 更新

Guides selection of identity, reasoning, and output approaches for Claude prompts based on task characteristics. Trigger on: "help me choose an approach," "which approach fits this task," "recommend a prompt pattern," "compare reasoning methods," "map this task to the right approach," "what combination of approaches," "which identity fits," "which reasoning method." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my prompt feels generic," "I don't know which approach to use," "my output lacks domain depth." Covers decision-tree logic across 8 identity approaches, 18 reasoning variants, and 10 output formats. After selection, use the relevant catalog skill if available to retrieve full templates. Activate whenever approach-selection across multiple categories is the primary decision. Do NOT use when the user already names a specific approach to retrieve (use the relevant catalog skill directly if available) or for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

drayline/rootnode-skills402026年9月14日 更新

Designs Claude Code prompts and CC environments. Produces CLAUDE.md drafts, agent topologies, scope-authorization frameworks, halt triggers, Skills/hooks/MCP plans, chat-to-CC handoff specs, and EXECUTION_PLAN.md remediation plans. Five modes: DESIGN (new CC deployments), EVOLVE (updates from friction), RESEARCH (evaluate a CC tool/pattern), TEMPLATE (reusable artifacts), REMEDIATE (consume hygiene findings → produce + execute plan). Do NOT use REMEDIATE for direct cleanup (Cat 1–10 — use rootnode-repo-hygiene Phase 2). Do NOT use for hygiene scanning (rootnode-repo-hygiene), chat prompts (rootnode-prompt-validation), or chat Projects (rootnode-project-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

drayline/rootnode-skills402026年9月14日 更新

Analyzes Claude Project context budget under the automatic-RAG-by-window model: knowledge files vs. threshold-exempt overhead (Skills, MCPs, CI, Memory). Two modes: Quick Diagnostic and Full Budget Audit. Use when user says "check my context budget," "how much context am I using," "is my project too big," "optimize my token usage," "tier my files," "optimize for RAG," "improve retrieval quality," "should I keep compressing," "am I over-compressing," "should I accept RAG mode." Also trigger on context pressure symptoms: "Claude forgets my instructions," "responses getting generic," "content not found in my knowledge files." Also use when a project audit scores Knowledge Architecture ≤ 3. Do NOT use for content placement decisions (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available), full project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), or behavioral tuning (use rootnode-behavioral-tuning if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

drayline/rootnode-skills402026年9月14日 更新

Independent re-derivation gate for proposed changes during autonomous execution. Evaluates a change (code diff, config edit, engine evolution, schema change) against the work's authority matrix and a 4-check protocol: invariant compliance, scope authorization, detection narrowness, and regression risk. Returns structured JSON with pass/fail per check, an overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / REJECT), and blockers. Profile-driven thresholds (strict for unattended runs, lenient for desk supervision). Use when an autonomous agent proposes an engine change, when reviewing a Claude Code-authored modification before merge, or when an unattended profile requires independent re-derivation. Trigger on: "review/approve this proposed change," "critic-gate this," "is this change safe," "is this safe to merge," "should I let this land," "run the critic." Do NOT use for handoff-readiness checks (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), general code review, or design-time correctness. Authority matrix required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

drayline/rootnode-skills402026年9月14日 更新

drayline のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する