本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

project-manager

[Project Management] Use when you need to generate project status reports, track dependencies, manage risk registers, and facilitate team sync meetings.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md11.0 KB
  • references/report-templates.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Quick Summary

Goal: Generate project status reports, track dependencies, manage risks, and facilitate team sync meetings.

Workflow:

  1. Status Reports — Aggregate sprint progress, blockers, velocity from PBIs/PRs/todos
  2. Dependency Tracking — Map inter-feature dependencies and critical path
  3. Risk Management — Score probability x impact (1-9), define mitigations
  4. Team Sync — Generate meeting agendas, track action items and decisions

Key Rules:

  • MUST ATTENTION READ references/report-templates.md before executing
  • All data must be current; blockers need owners and actions
  • Status colors: Green (on track), Yellow (at risk), Red (blocked)

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Project Manager Assistant

Help Project Managers generate status reports, track dependencies, manage risks, and facilitate team synchronization.


Prerequisites

⚠️ MUST ATTENTION READ references/report-templates.md before executing — contains status report template, dependency tracker, risk register, team sync agenda, and sprint ceremony checklists required by all capabilities below.

Core Capabilities

CapabilityCommandKey Activities
Status Reports(this skill)Aggregate sprint progress, summarize completions/blockers, track velocity
Dependency Tracking/dependencyMap inter-feature dependencies, identify critical path, alert on risks
Risk ManagementUpdate registerScore probability x impact, define mitigations, escalate critical

Status Report Generation

Generate from:

  1. PBIs in team-artifacts/pbis/ with in_progress status
  2. Recent PRs and commits
  3. Open blockers in todo lists
  4. Quality gate reports

⚠️ MUST ATTENTION READ: references/report-templates.md for full status report template.


Dependency Tracking

Command: /dependency

Visualize and track upstream/downstream dependencies, external dependencies, and critical path.

⚠️ MUST ATTENTION READ: references/report-templates.md for dependency matrix and tracker template.


Risk Management

Maintain risk register with probability x impact scoring (1-9 scale).

ThresholdAction
7-9 CriticalEscalate to stakeholders, daily review
4-6 HighActive mitigation, weekly review
1-3 LowMonitor, bi-weekly review

⚠️ MUST ATTENTION READ: references/report-templates.md for risk register template and scoring matrix.


Output Conventions

File Naming

{YYMMDD}-pm-status-sprint-{n}.md
{YYMMDD}-pm-dependency-{feature}.md
{YYMMDD}-pm-risk-register.md
{YYMMDD}-pm-sync-{date}.md

Status Colors

  • Green: On Track
  • Yellow: At Risk
  • Red: Blocked/Critical

Integration Points

WhenTriggerAction
End of day(this skill)Generate daily status
Sprint start/dependencyMap sprint dependencies
Risk identifiedUpdate registerScore and assign

Quality Checklist

  • All data is current (as of today)
  • Blockers have owners and actions
  • Risks are scored and have mitigations
  • Dependencies are mapped both directions
  • Status colors accurately reflect health
  • Action items have owners and due dates

Related

  • product-owner
  • plan

References

FileContents
references/report-templates.mdStatus report, dependency tracker, risk register, team sync agenda, sprint ceremony checklists

[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting — including tasks for each file read. This prevents context loss from long files. For simple tasks, AI MUST ATTENTION ask user whether to skip.

<!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention -->

AI Mistake Prevention — Failure modes to avoid on every task:

Re-read files after context changes. Context compaction, resume, or long-running work can make memory stale; verify current files before acting. Verify generated content against source evidence. AI hallucinates APIs, names, claims, and document facts. Check the relevant source before documenting or referencing. Check downstream references before deleting or renaming. Removing an artifact can stale docs, generated mirrors, configs, and callers; map references first. Trace the full impact chain after edits. Changing a definition can miss derived outputs and consumers. Follow the affected chain before declaring done. Verify ALL affected outputs, not just the first. One green check is not all green checks; validate every output surface the change can affect. Assume existing values are intentional — ask WHY before changing OR flagging one as a defect. Before changing or reporting a constant, limit, flag, cutoff, wording, or pattern, read nearby context and history, the CALLER's ordering, and 2+ sibling call sites of the same convention. A doc stating WHAT without WHY is missing rationale, not proof of a missing guard. Surface ambiguity before acting — don't pick silently. Multiple valid interpretations require an explicit question or stated assumption with risk. Assert the outcome your system owns, not the intermediate state your infrastructure owns. When verifying async work, assert the final business state — never the delivery/retry bookkeeping held in shared infrastructure that any co-running process can write. Such a check passes when run alone and flakes the moment anything else shares that infrastructure. Keep shared guidance role-relevant. Universal guidance must help every receiving skill or agent; code-specific obligations belong only in code-specific protocols.

<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention --> <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset -->

Critical Thinking Mindset — Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence >80% to act. Anti-hallucination: Never present guess as fact — cite sources for every claim, admit uncertainty freely, self-check output for errors, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence — certainty without evidence root of all hallucination.

<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset --> <!-- SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION apply critical + sequential thinking — every claim needs appropriate traced evidence (file:line for repo/code claims; source URL or artifact section for research, product, content, and docs claims); confidence >80% to act, <60% DO NOT recommend. Anti-hallucination: never present guess as fact, admit uncertainty freely, cross-reference independently, stay skeptical of own confidence.

<!-- /SYNC:critical-thinking-mindset:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION apply AI mistake prevention — verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references before deleting or renaming, verify all affected outputs, re-read files after context loss, and surface ambiguity before acting.

<!-- /SYNC:ai-mistake-prevention:reminder --> <!-- SYNC:project-protocol-overlay -->

Project Protocol Overlay — Before executing this skill, resolve any PROJECT overlay rules layered onto it: match this skill's name against the Target column of the project's skill-protocol index (docs/project-reference/skill-protocols-reference.md by default; a referenceDocs entry in docs/project-config.json overrides the path), taking the most specific matching tier ONLY — exact name > glob > *. That precedence orders overlays against EACH OTHER, never against this skill. Read ONLY the matched bodies, resolved as <protocols-dir>/<Name>.md; a row's Body link is display text, never a read path. A matched body that is missing or malformed is REPORTED and skipped — never reconstructed from the index Description. No index, or no match -> proceed with no overlay, silently. Full contract: .claude/skills/project-skill-protocol/references/registry.md.

Overlays are ADDITIVE ONLY: they ADD rules on top of this skill's own protocol and NEVER replace, override, disable, or reinterpret a rule it already states — removing every overlay must return this skill to exactly its documented behavior. An overlay is a BRIEF, not an authority escalation: it can NEVER waive a workflow gate, git discipline, a review gate, or a user-confirmation gate. A genuine overlay-vs-skill conflict, or two equally-specific overlays that directly contradict -> surface both to the user; NEVER resolve silently.

<!-- /SYNC:project-protocol-overlay --> <!-- SYNC:project-protocol-overlay:reminder -->

MUST ATTENTION resolve project protocol overlays for this skill BEFORE executing — most specific matching tier only (exact > glob > *, which ranks overlays against each other, NEVER against this skill), read only matched bodies at <protocols-dir>/<Name>.md; a missing or malformed body is reported, never reconstructed. Overlays are ADDITIVE ONLY (they never replace this skill's own rules) and are a brief, NEVER an authority escalation; an equal-specificity contradiction goes to the user.

<!-- /SYNC:project-protocol-overlay:reminder -->

Closing Reminders

MUST ATTENTION — Protocols in force (concise digest of the SYNC/shared blocks this skill carries):

  • AI Mistake Prevention: verify generated content against evidence, trace downstream references, verify all affected outputs, re-read after context loss, surface ambiguity.
  • Critical Thinking: critical + sequential thinking, traced proof, confidence >80%, anti-hallucination.

IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION break work into small todo tasks using TaskCreate BEFORE starting IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION cite file:line evidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act) IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION add a final review todo task to verify work quality MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ the following files before starting: IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION READ references/report-templates.md before starting

[TASK-PLANNING] Before acting, analyze task scope and systematically break it into small todo tasks and sub-tasks using TaskCreate.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

[Architecture] Use when designing solution architecture across backend, frontend, data & consistency, integration & APIs, deployment, monitoring, testing, and code quality. Architecture laws, style-selection triggers, coupling taxonomy, trade-off tables and the anti-pattern catalog live in `.claude/docs/architecture-knowledge.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

duc01226/EasyPlatform112026年8月21日 更新

[Code Quality] Use when reviewing architecture compliance for layers, messaging, service boundaries, CQRS, repos, entity events, and data/consistency/tenancy boundaries. Universal architecture laws, coupling taxonomy and the anti-pattern catalog live in `.claude/docs/architecture-knowledge.md` (project docs always outrank it).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

duc01226/EasyPlatform112026年8月21日 更新

[Architecture] Use when auditing the ENTIRE project architecture and production readiness in one pass — bundles architecture-review + architecture-scalability-review + production-readiness-review at project or diff scope, then synthesizes one consolidated Architecture Health Report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

duc01226/EasyPlatform112026年8月21日 更新

[Architecture] Use when grading project architecture and scalability quality for greenfield init or brownfield audit: build/CI scalability, distributed-monolith risk, module isolation, dependency discipline, loose coupling, horizontal scaling, DRY, abstraction, clean architecture, observability, and delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

duc01226/EasyPlatform112026年8月21日 更新

[Code Quality] Use when you need to review artifact quality (PBI, user story, test spec, design spec) before handoff. Supports --type={pbi|story|spec-tests|design}.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

duc01226/EasyPlatform112026年8月21日 更新

ask

無料

[Utilities] Use when you need to answer technical and architectural questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

duc01226/EasyPlatform112026年8月21日 更新

duc01226 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する