本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

prototype

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md3.2 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml100 B
  • LOGIC.md6.0 KB
  • UI.md6.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- path-routing:start -->

Repository configuration overrides this skill's default planning paths. If a Planning root is defined, resolve CONTEXT.md, docs/adr/, docs/agents/, .scratch/, and .out-of-scope/ from that root. Skill-local paths remain unchanged.

<!-- path-routing:end -->

Prototype

A prototype is throwaway code that answers a question. The question decides the shape.

Pick a branch

Identify which question is being answered — from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around:

  • "Does this logic / state model feel right?" → LOGIC.md. Build a single shareable HTML file — free-play buttons plus tabbed guided walkthroughs — that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper, and that a non-developer can drive.
  • "What should this look like?" → UI.md. Generate several radically different UI variations on a single route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar.

The two branches produce very different artifacts — getting this wrong wastes the whole prototype. If the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user isn't reachable, default to whichever branch better matches the surrounding code (a backend module → logic; a page or component → UI) and state the assumption at the top of the prototype.

Rules that apply to both

  1. Throwaway from day one, and clearly marked as such. Locate the prototype code close to where it will actually be used (next to the module or page it's prototyping for) so context is obvious — but name it so a casual reader can see it's a prototype, not production. For throwaway UI routes, obey whatever routing convention the project already uses; don't invent a new top-level structure.
  2. Trivial to run. A UI prototype starts from one command in the project's task runner — pnpm <name>, python <path>, bun <path>, etc. A logic demo is a single HTML file the user double-clicks. Either way, no thinking required to start it.
  3. No persistence by default. State lives in memory. Persistence is the thing the prototype is checking, not something it should depend on. If the question explicitly involves a database, hit a scratch DB or a local file with a clear "PROTOTYPE — wipe me" name.
  4. Skip the polish. No tests, no error handling beyond what makes the prototype runnable, no abstractions. The point is to learn something fast.
  5. Surface the state. After every action (logic) or on every variant switch (UI), print or render the full relevant state so the user can see what changed.
  6. Capture it when done. Fold any validated decision into the real code, then capture the prototype itself as a primary source: commit it to a throwaway branch, out of main, and leave a context pointer to that branch on the implementation issue. Capture the answer too — the verdict and the question it settled — in the issue or a commit. The main branch keeps only the validated decision.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

ask-matt

無料

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

egma-ai/egma1442026年9月30日 更新

bro

無料

Re-explain the previous assistant message in a much simpler way — for when the reply made you go 'bro what'. Use /bro to get a plain-language version of the last answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

egma-ai/egma1442026年9月30日 更新

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

egma-ai/egma1442026年9月30日 更新

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

egma-ai/egma1442026年9月30日 更新

Drive one ticketed effort through parallel implementation, independent review, serial integration, and one open pull request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

egma-ai/egma1442026年9月30日 更新

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

egma-ai/egma1442026年9月30日 更新

egma-ai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する