本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

hunt-spa-api

Discover a single-page-app's hidden backend API from its public JS bundle, then test that API for broken access control / missing authentication. One of the highest-yield web plays in modern recon — SPAs ship their entire backend route map to the browser, and the API behind them is frequently missing the auth middleware the login page implies. Built from an authorized engagement where this play found an unauthenticated financial API that an ASM scan reporting hundreds of "Criticals" completely missed. Use whenever a target serves a JS-heavy SPA (React/Vue/Angular/Next), an "app"/"console"/"dashboard"/"portal" subdomain, or any `*api*` host shows up in recon. Leaked build artifacts (source maps / .env / .git / asset-manifest) are owned by hunt-source-leak; API version-inventory and behavioral diffing by hunt-shadow-api; this skill owns mapping a live SPA's backend routes from its JS bundle and testing them for broken access control / missing auth.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

When to use this skill

Trigger when:

  • A target host returns a tiny HTML shell + big /static/js/*.js or /_next/static/* bundles (React/Vue/Angular/Next/Svelte SPA)
  • You see a subdomain named console, app, dashboard, portal, admin, panel, manage, internal
  • Recon surfaces any *api*, *-api*, api.* host
  • A login page is OAuth/SSO-gated (the frontend auth tells you nothing about whether the API enforces auth)

The core insight: a SPA is a client to a backend API, and it ships the full map of that API — hosts, routes, sometimes keys — to anyone who views source. The login page being protected says nothing about whether the API behind it checks tokens. Auth is frequently enforced on the gateway/login and missing on a route group of the API.

DO NOT skip this because "the app needs login" — that's exactly when this pays off.


The play (5 steps)

1. Pull the shell + enumerate the bundles

curl -s https://console.target.com/ -o index.html
# React/CRA:
grep -oE '/static/js/[^"]+\.js' index.html
# Next.js:
grep -oE '/_next/static/[^"]+\.js' index.html
# generic:
grep -oiE 'src="[^"]+\.js[^"]*"' index.html

Download every bundle (they can be multi-MB — that's fine, it's all route data):

mkdir bundles
for j in $(grep -oE '/static/js/[^"]+\.js' index.html | sort -u); do
  curl -s "https://console.target.com$j" -o "bundles/$(echo "$j"|tr '/' '_')"
done

2. Harvest API hosts, routes, and secrets from the bundles

B=bundles/*.js
# Backend API hosts (incl. dev/beta/staging variants — often weaker auth)
grep -ohiE 'https://[a-z0-9.-]*(api|console|backend|service)[a-z0-9.-]*\.target\.com[a-z0-9/_-]*' $B | sort -u
# Versioned API base paths
grep -ohiE '/api/v[0-9]+/?' $B | sort -u
# Route literals — minified bundles store routes as STRING segments, not full URLs.
# Grep for quoted "resource/action" strings:
grep -ohiE '"[a-z0-9_-]+/[a-z0-9_/-]+"' $B | tr -d '"' \
  | grep -iE '(login|user|account|order|billing|invoice|payment|deal|report|token|otp|password|reset|admin|profile|auth|upload|export|role|permission|dashboard|wallet|finance|sales)' | sort -u
# Secrets (validate before trusting — most AIza keys are Maps/analytics, not Auth)
grep -ohiE '(AIza[0-9A-Za-z_-]{35}|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|sk_live_[0-9A-Za-z]+|eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]{10,}\.[A-Za-z0-9_-]{10,}|apiKey["'"'"']?\s*[:=]\s*["'"'"'][^"'"'"']+)' $B | sort -u

Note: minifiers store routes as concatenated string segments (e.g. "account/payment/list"), NOT full /api/v2/... URLs — so a naive /api/v* grep returns nothing. Grep for the resource-word route strings and prepend the base yourself.

Lazy-loaded (async) chunks — don't stop at HTML-referenced bundles. CRA/webpack SPAs reference only runtime+main+vendor in index.html; numbered async route chunks are named inside main.js's chunk map and loaded at runtime, so grepping only /static/js/*.js from the shell truncates route coverage to eager chunks.

grep -oE '[0-9]+:"[a-f0-9]+"' bundles/*main*.js        # {chunkId:"hash"} pairs
# reconstruct /static/js/<id>.<hash>.chunk.js, download each, re-run route/host/secret harvest
# asset-manifest.json (if present) lists them all -> hunt-source-leak

3. Establish a CONTROL — find an endpoint that IS gated

Before declaring anything vulnerable, send an unauthenticated request to an endpoint you expect to be protected, and capture what correct rejection looks like:

curl -s -X POST https://api.target.com/api/users -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{}'
# secure → {"error":"Missing or invalid authorization header"} or HTTP 401

This is your differential. A sibling API (e.g. a second API host, or a different route group on the same host) is the ideal control — same stack, so a different response = real authz gap, not a quirk.

4. Test each route family UNAUTHENTICATED, both methods

For every discovered route, send it with no Authorization header and compare to the control:

for r in <routes>; do
  curl -s -o /tmp/r -w "[%{http_code}] $r\n" -X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{}' "https://api.target.com/api/v2/$r"
done

Interpret:

  • 401/"Missing authorization" → gated (correct). Move on.
  • 200 with data → unauthenticated data exposure. Finding.
  • 400 "field X is mandatory" → the route processed your request and reached business-logic validation without an auth check → auth bypass; supply the field minimally to confirm.
  • 200 + verbose DB/stack error (e.g. PROCEDURE db_x.sp_y does not exist) → reached the data layer unauthenticated; also a SQLi-surface signal.
  • Mandatory fields named like is_admin / is_internal / requested_by / role_id / account_type → authorization derived from client-supplied parameters — set the privilege flag and you self-elevate. Critical-class.

5. Pivot & prove (minimally)

  • IDs returned by one endpoint (account_id, order_id, deal_id) are the keys the other endpoints consume — they prove the whole router is reachable, not just one route.
  • Test dev-/beta-/staging- API variants — they frequently have weaker/disabled auth.
  • Check the response headers: Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * compounds the issue (any web origin reads it from a victim's browser).
  • STOP at minimum-necessary proof. A handful of records (or a totalCount) confirms the missing check. Do NOT enumerate the table — see redteam-mindset data-minimization boundary. The finding is the absent auth, not the data volume.

What "the API behind the SSO login" really means

A common, dangerous architecture:

  • console.target.com (the SPA) → login is Entra/Okta/Google OAuth (looks airtight).
  • api.target.com (the backend) → some route groups enforce the bearer token, some route groups forgot the middleware.

The frontend login is theatre if the API doesn't independently validate the token on every route. Always test the API directly, bare, regardless of how locked-down the login UI is.


Anti-patterns

  • "The app requires login, so the API must be protected." No — test the API directly, unauthenticated. The whole point.
  • "Minified bundle, can't read it." You don't need to read it — grep it for hosts/routes/secrets. 5 minutes.
  • "/api/v1/foo returned 404, so no API here." Wrong base or wrong method. Try /api/, /api/v2/, POST not GET, and the exact route strings from the bundle (Express's 404 echoes the path — use it to calibrate).
  • "AIza key found → critical secret." Validate first — most are Maps/analytics keys (CONFIGURATION_NOT_FOUND on identitytoolkit = not Auth-enabled). Don't over-claim.
  • Dumping the whole dataset once you get a 200. Stop at PoC. (redteam-mindset.)
  • Account-creation / write endpoints as "proof". Read endpoints prove the auth gap without creating state. Never POST a create/signup/upload to "demonstrate" — that's a destructive write needing explicit per-action authorization.

Related Skills & Chains

  • hunt-api-misconfig — once the API is mapped, run the broader misconfig matrix (method tampering, mass assignment, JWT alg confusion) per route.
  • hunt-idor — the account_id/order_id pivots feed straight into IDOR testing across discovered routes.
  • hunt-source-leak — sourcemaps (*.js.map) reconstruct original source for deeper route/secret extraction; same harvesting muscle.
  • hunt-nextjs — for Next.js targets, layer the middleware-bypass (x-middleware-subrequest) and /_next/data route tests on top of this.
  • redteam-mindset — the data-minimization boundary governs step 5: prove the missing check, don't exfiltrate the table.
  • recon-scope-triage — verify the API host actually belongs to the target before testing (don't pop a same-named third party's API).

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

End-to-end Android APK red-team pipeline — automated APK acquisition (Play Store + apkpure + apkmirror fallback), jadx decompilation, secret/URL/JWT/Firebase grep, pinned-cert extraction, exported-component enumeration, Frida runtime instrumentation templates, intent-injection probes. Built from an authorized external red-team engagement where 7 APKs were pulled manually, 4 download attempts truncated, and a hardcoded JWT + 30 internal API endpoints were recovered from one of the apps. Use when target has a mobile app catalogue (Play Store developer page), when you find an APK URL hosted on a web server, or when post-recon mentions "mobile app" in scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5,0342026年10月11日 更新

Local-tooling companion to the bug-bounty orchestrator — carries the SAME complete bug-bounty workflow, but reach for THIS variant when you also need to resolve where tools, wordlists, and clones are installed on the local machine (jhaddix, SecLists, trufflehog, ffuf, dalfox, ghauri); for pure orchestration/routing use the bug-bounty skill. Workflow it covers — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use when you need the local install path of a tool / wordlist / clone for a hunt, or as the full-workflow variant when operating from this local toolkit; for general routing use the bug-bounty skill. 中文触发词:漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5,0342026年10月11日 更新

Use at the START of any bug bounty hunting session, when switching targets, or when feeling lost about what to do next. Master orchestrator that combines the 5-phase non-linear hunting workflow with the critical thinking framework (developer psychology, anomaly detection, What-If experiments). Routes to all other skills based on current hunting phase. Also use when asking "what should I do next" or "where am I in the process."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5,0342026年10月11日 更新

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词:漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5,0342026年10月11日 更新

Bugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exact match exists, manual severity override when VRT defaults underrate impact, severity-request paragraph as first body section, OOS-clause rebuttal templates (rate limiting on auth-flow endpoints, debug-info framing, user-enumeration with sensitive PII, theoretical-issue counter), chained-finding cross-reference patterns, target selection for QA-vs-prod programs, researcher-side hygiene (Bugcrowdninja email alias, account state restoration, friendly-tester posture). Use when filing a Bugcrowd submission, when VRT default seems wrong, when triager closes as OOS or downgrades severity, when chaining linked submissions, or when scope distinguishes production from QA. Pairs with report-writing and triage-validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5,0342026年10月11日 更新

Cloud IAM red-team attack chain across AWS, Azure, GCP — focused on EXTERNAL exploitation paths and post-credential-discovery privilege analysis. Covers IAM enumeration (aws iam, az role, gcloud iam), STS/AssumeRole chaining, Azure Managed Identity abuse (via SSRF/leak), GCP service account JSON abuse, IMDSv1/v2 attacks via SSRF, K8s ServiceAccount token privilege analysis once held (token discovery / cluster exposure is owned by hunt-k8s), role-trust-policy confused-deputy, cross-account assume-role enumeration, IAM privilege escalation patterns (24+ AWS, 8+ Azure, 6+ GCP), and AWS Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated-role attack chain (GetId → GetCredentialsForIdentity → IAM role abuse). Built for the case where recon yields a credential (key, JSON, token) and you need to know what it grants and how to escalate. Use when an AWS key / Azure secret / GCP service account JSON / K8s SA token surfaces from a code repo, JS bundle, APK, breach corpus, or SSRF chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter5,0342026年10月11日 更新

elementalsouls のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する