Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before finishing any code (endpoint, query, migration, render, file, infra, dependency, test) — the senior pre-ship checklist of invisible cross-cutting controls AI omits, with backstop greps
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
AI writes the code the prompt literally asked for and stops. The controls a senior adds from unstated context — authorization, tenant scope, validation, transactions, encryption, rate limiting, output encoding, error handling, edge cases, package existence — are invisible to a single-file prompt, so they are the first thing dropped. They are also the classes pattern-linters miss. This skill is the pre-ship checklist: for the surface you just wrote, assert the matching control is present, run the backstop grep, and route to the deep skill when it needs more than a check.
This is a routing + verification layer — it does not re-teach what the deep skills own. It is the "did I supply the invisible controls?" gate that senior-engineering-discipline points at.
senior-engineering-discipline rule fired and routed you here.Do NOT use when: the change is prose/docs/config-only, or a one-line rename — there is no code surface to check.
FOR EVERY SURFACE YOU TOUCHED, NAME THE INVISIBLE CONTROL AND CONFIRM IT IS PRESENT.
"NOT MENTIONED IN THE PROMPT" IS EXACTLY WHY IT IS MISSING — CHECK IT ANYWAY.
A CONTROL DEFINED BUT NOT WIRED IS ABSENT. A grep IS CHEAPER THAN A BREACH.
Run the row(s) for what you touched. The grep is a fast authoring-time backstop (not a substitute for reading the code); zero results is the pass, a hit is a prompt to look.
| Surface you wrote | Invisible controls to assert | Deep skill |
|---|---|---|
| HTTP endpoint / route | authorization (this principal may act on this resource — not just authenticated); tenant scope; the three negative tests (unauth→401, non-owner→403/404, cross-tenant→403/404); input validation at the boundary; rate limit actually wired; state-changing → CSRF + audit log | broken-access-control, authz-review, threat-modeling |
| DB query / ORM | parameterized, never string-built; tenant predicate present; no SELECT * across a serialization boundary; N+1 avoided (eager load) | source-discovery, security |
| Migration | reversible (down); expand-contract for drop/rename (never a bare DROP COLUMN before code stops reading it); transaction; index on new FK/filter column | engineering-safety-floor, migration-architect |
| User-controlled render (FE) | output-encoded; no dangerouslySetInnerHTML/v-html/innerHTML/eval on non-constant input; no secret/token in client code; token not in localStorage. This surface also carries the four completeness rows below — they are part of it, not an optional extra. | frontend-render-security |
| Third-party asset in shipped markup / CSS | delivery is self-hosted through the project's own route (framework font/asset primitive, bundled package, or locally-served file) — a font/icon/stylesheet CDN link transmits the visitor's IP to that third party on every page view; a hotlink only on a stated consumer opt-in; integrity + crossorigin if a CDN link stays | design-fidelity-mechanics § Asset & imagery discipline (owner), typography-system |
| File / outbound fetch | path confined to an allowed base; SSRF allow-list + private-IP block on user-supplied URLs; size limit; explicit timeout (no unbounded/default-infinite wait); server-side validation (never client-only) | security, defense-in-depth |
| Infra / IaC | least-privilege (no Action:*/Resource:*); encryption at rest; no 0.0.0.0/0 to mgmt/DB ports; no hardcoded creds; scanner-verified, not plan-verified | engineering-safety-floor, terraform, secrets-management |
| New dependency | package exists on the real registry (not hallucinated); not typo-adjacent to a popular one; pinned + lockfile committed; CVE-scanned | supply-chain-intake, dependency-upgrade |
| Secrets/credentials | never a literal in source; env / secret-manager reference; password columns use bcrypt/argon2, never MD5/SHA; agent/MCP config too — no raw key in .mcp.json / agent-config / CI YAML / a committed .env (env-var indirection, gitignored) | secrets-management, domain-safety-pii |
| Error path / timeout / retry | failure handled, never silently swallowed (no empty catch {}); external call has a bounded timeout; retry is capped + backed-off + idempotent (no retry storm); the error surfaced to the caller carries no secret / stack / PII; a partial failure leaves consistent state (no half-written record) | systematic-debugging, defense-in-depth |
| Concurrency / shared state | check-then-act guarded (DB lock / atomic op / transaction — not a read-modify-write race); retried write carries an idempotency key; no unbounded parallel fan-out; shared mutable state synchronized | source-discovery, security |
| Test | asserts general behavior; expected derived from inputs/seeded data, not hardcoded; boundary + error + abuse cases, not only happy path | testing-anti-patterns, test-driven-development |
Every row above is a security control. These four are the completeness controls for the same surface — the states an agent most reliably omits, because the prompt named the happy path and nothing else. A render that ships only the populated state is not finished; it is one of four states written.
The grep polarity is INVERTED here, and reading it the other way is the failure
mode this table has. Above, zero hits is the pass. Below, zero hits next to a
render that fetches or iterates is the prompt to look — the state is probably
absent. A hit is not a pass either: the column is a heuristic, a locator for
code to read, never proof the state behaves. A framework abstraction can
implement all four correctly and match none of these patterns, and a codebase can
match all four while shipping a broken empty state.
| State | Assert on the render you wrote | Backstop grep (heuristic — zero hits is the prompt) |
|---|---|---|
| Empty | the zero-rows / no-results case renders a deliberate state, not a bare frame or a collapsed layout; it says what is missing and what the user can do next | rg -n -e '\.length\s*[=<]' -e '\bisEmpty\b' -e 'count\(\)\s*[=<]' -e '\bempty\b' — over the file that maps the collection |
| Loading | the pending case renders (skeleton, spinner, disabled control); no layout shift on arrival; the state is reachable from the actual async call, not only defined | rg -n -e 'isLoading' -e 'isPending' -e 'isFetching' -e 'Skeleton' -e 'Spinner' -e 'aria-busy' |
| Error | the failed case renders a recoverable state with a retry or a next step; the message carries no stack, secret or PII (the frontend-render-security row owns that half) | rg -n -e 'isError' -e 'onError' -e 'ErrorBoundary' -e '\.catch\(' -e 'role="alert"' |
| Keyboard path | every interactive element is reachable and operable by keyboard alone, with a visible focus ring; a click handler on a non-button element carries a role, tabindex and a key handler | rg -n -e 'onClick' -e '@click' -e 'v-on:click' lists the handlers, then rg -n -e 'tabIndex' -e 'tabindex' -e 'onKeyDown' -e '@keydown' -e 'role=' on the same file — a handler with no match on the second is the prompt |
Route to accessibility-auditor for the keyboard row when the surface is more
than a handful of controls — this row asserts the path exists, it is not a WCAG
pass.
# Frontend insecure render / client secrets (React + Vue + vanilla)
rg -n 'dangerouslySetInnerHTML|v-html|\.innerHTML\s*=|\beval\(|new Function\('
rg -n 'NEXT_PUBLIC_.*(SECRET|KEY|TOKEN)|VITE_.*(SECRET|KEY)|localStorage\.setItem\([^)]*[Tt]oken'
# String-built SQL (concatenation / interpolation into a query)
rg -n 'query\(.*(\+|\$\{|`).*\)|(SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE|DELETE).*(\+|\$\{)'
# Hardcoded secrets / weak hashing
rg -n 'AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|sk_live_|AIza[0-9A-Za-z_\-]{35}|password\s*=\s*["\x27]|md5\(|sha1\(' .
# Infra: wildcard IAM / open ingress / disabled TLS
rg -n '"Action"\s*:\s*"\*"|"Resource"\s*:\s*"\*"|0\.0\.0\.0/0|InsecureSkipVerify|verify=false|curl.*\| *bash' .
# Raw secret in an agent/MCP/CI config (should be an env-var reference, not a literal)
rg -n '(sk_live_|sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20}|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|ghp_[0-9A-Za-z]{36}|AIza[0-9A-Za-z_\-]{35})' --glob '*.mcp.json' --glob '.mcp.json' --glob '*.env' --glob '**/agent*config*' --glob '.github/workflows/*'
# Swallowed error (empty catch) / unbounded external call (no timeout arg)
rg -n 'catch\s*\([^)]*\)\s*\{\s*\}|except[^:]*:\s*pass' .
Stack-specific patterns (the greps name several ecosystems side by side on purpose): keep the ones for the stack in front of you; a hit means read that line, not auto-fix.
endpoint: authz ✓ tenant-scope ✓ rate-limit wired ✓ validation ✓, naming the file:line where each control lives (or n/a — <reason>).encrypted = true on a resource that doesn't support it) reads as a present control but does nothing — a scanner catches it, a code read does not.security-sensitive-stop still requires a threat pass before editing.senior-engineering-discipline — the anchor rule that routes here.frontend-render-security, supply-chain-intake, testing-anti-patterns.authz-review, threat-modeling, defense-in-depth, source-discovery, secrets-management.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。