本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ai-code-blindspots

Before finishing any code (endpoint, query, migration, render, file, infra, dependency, test) — the senior pre-ship checklist of invisible cross-cutting controls AI omits, with backstop greps

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md12.4 KB
  • evals/triggers.json2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

ai-code-blindspots

AI writes the code the prompt literally asked for and stops. The controls a senior adds from unstated context — authorization, tenant scope, validation, transactions, encryption, rate limiting, output encoding, error handling, edge cases, package existence — are invisible to a single-file prompt, so they are the first thing dropped. They are also the classes pattern-linters miss. This skill is the pre-ship checklist: for the surface you just wrote, assert the matching control is present, run the backstop grep, and route to the deep skill when it needs more than a check.

This is a routing + verification layer — it does not re-teach what the deep skills own. It is the "did I supply the invisible controls?" gate that senior-engineering-discipline points at.

When to use

  • You have written (or are about to finish) an endpoint, query, migration, UI render, file/network op, infra resource, dependency change, or test — before you call it done.
  • Reviewing an AI-authored diff and asking "what did it silently omit?".
  • The senior-engineering-discipline rule fired and routed you here.

Do NOT use when: the change is prose/docs/config-only, or a one-line rename — there is no code surface to check.

The Iron Law

FOR EVERY SURFACE YOU TOUCHED, NAME THE INVISIBLE CONTROL AND CONFIRM IT IS PRESENT.
"NOT MENTIONED IN THE PROMPT" IS EXACTLY WHY IT IS MISSING — CHECK IT ANYWAY.
A CONTROL DEFINED BUT NOT WIRED IS ABSENT. A grep IS CHEAPER THAN A BREACH.

Procedure

  1. Inspect the change and list the surfaces it touched (endpoint, query, migration, render, file/fetch, infra, dependency, test) — analyze what you actually wrote before checking it.
  2. For each surface, take its row below: assert every listed invisible control is present (with file:line), and run the matching backstop grep.
  3. For anything a grep flags or a check can't confirm, open the routed deep skill.
  4. Emit the per-surface confirmation (Output format); surface any unresolved gap to the user — never silently omit.

Surface → invisible controls → backstop

Run the row(s) for what you touched. The grep is a fast authoring-time backstop (not a substitute for reading the code); zero results is the pass, a hit is a prompt to look.

Surface you wroteInvisible controls to assertDeep skill
HTTP endpoint / routeauthorization (this principal may act on this resource — not just authenticated); tenant scope; the three negative tests (unauth→401, non-owner→403/404, cross-tenant→403/404); input validation at the boundary; rate limit actually wired; state-changing → CSRF + audit logbroken-access-control, authz-review, threat-modeling
DB query / ORMparameterized, never string-built; tenant predicate present; no SELECT * across a serialization boundary; N+1 avoided (eager load)source-discovery, security
Migrationreversible (down); expand-contract for drop/rename (never a bare DROP COLUMN before code stops reading it); transaction; index on new FK/filter columnengineering-safety-floor, migration-architect
User-controlled render (FE)output-encoded; no dangerouslySetInnerHTML/v-html/innerHTML/eval on non-constant input; no secret/token in client code; token not in localStorage. This surface also carries the four completeness rows below — they are part of it, not an optional extra.frontend-render-security
Third-party asset in shipped markup / CSSdelivery is self-hosted through the project's own route (framework font/asset primitive, bundled package, or locally-served file) — a font/icon/stylesheet CDN link transmits the visitor's IP to that third party on every page view; a hotlink only on a stated consumer opt-in; integrity + crossorigin if a CDN link staysdesign-fidelity-mechanics § Asset & imagery discipline (owner), typography-system
File / outbound fetchpath confined to an allowed base; SSRF allow-list + private-IP block on user-supplied URLs; size limit; explicit timeout (no unbounded/default-infinite wait); server-side validation (never client-only)security, defense-in-depth
Infra / IaCleast-privilege (no Action:*/Resource:*); encryption at rest; no 0.0.0.0/0 to mgmt/DB ports; no hardcoded creds; scanner-verified, not plan-verifiedengineering-safety-floor, terraform, secrets-management
New dependencypackage exists on the real registry (not hallucinated); not typo-adjacent to a popular one; pinned + lockfile committed; CVE-scannedsupply-chain-intake, dependency-upgrade
Secrets/credentialsnever a literal in source; env / secret-manager reference; password columns use bcrypt/argon2, never MD5/SHA; agent/MCP config too — no raw key in .mcp.json / agent-config / CI YAML / a committed .env (env-var indirection, gitignored)secrets-management, domain-safety-pii
Error path / timeout / retryfailure handled, never silently swallowed (no empty catch {}); external call has a bounded timeout; retry is capped + backed-off + idempotent (no retry storm); the error surfaced to the caller carries no secret / stack / PII; a partial failure leaves consistent state (no half-written record)systematic-debugging, defense-in-depth
Concurrency / shared statecheck-then-act guarded (DB lock / atomic op / transaction — not a read-modify-write race); retried write carries an idempotency key; no unbounded parallel fan-out; shared mutable state synchronizedsource-discovery, security
Testasserts general behavior; expected derived from inputs/seeded data, not hardcoded; boundary + error + abuse cases, not only happy pathtesting-anti-patterns, test-driven-development

Render surface — the completeness rows

Every row above is a security control. These four are the completeness controls for the same surface — the states an agent most reliably omits, because the prompt named the happy path and nothing else. A render that ships only the populated state is not finished; it is one of four states written.

The grep polarity is INVERTED here, and reading it the other way is the failure mode this table has. Above, zero hits is the pass. Below, zero hits next to a render that fetches or iterates is the prompt to look — the state is probably absent. A hit is not a pass either: the column is a heuristic, a locator for code to read, never proof the state behaves. A framework abstraction can implement all four correctly and match none of these patterns, and a codebase can match all four while shipping a broken empty state.

StateAssert on the render you wroteBackstop grep (heuristic — zero hits is the prompt)
Emptythe zero-rows / no-results case renders a deliberate state, not a bare frame or a collapsed layout; it says what is missing and what the user can do nextrg -n -e '\.length\s*[=<]' -e '\bisEmpty\b' -e 'count\(\)\s*[=<]' -e '\bempty\b' — over the file that maps the collection
Loadingthe pending case renders (skeleton, spinner, disabled control); no layout shift on arrival; the state is reachable from the actual async call, not only definedrg -n -e 'isLoading' -e 'isPending' -e 'isFetching' -e 'Skeleton' -e 'Spinner' -e 'aria-busy'
Errorthe failed case renders a recoverable state with a retry or a next step; the message carries no stack, secret or PII (the frontend-render-security row owns that half)rg -n -e 'isError' -e 'onError' -e 'ErrorBoundary' -e '\.catch\(' -e 'role="alert"'
Keyboard pathevery interactive element is reachable and operable by keyboard alone, with a visible focus ring; a click handler on a non-button element carries a role, tabindex and a key handlerrg -n -e 'onClick' -e '@click' -e 'v-on:click' lists the handlers, then rg -n -e 'tabIndex' -e 'tabindex' -e 'onKeyDown' -e '@keydown' -e 'role=' on the same file — a handler with no match on the second is the prompt

Route to accessibility-auditor for the keyboard row when the surface is more than a handful of controls — this row asserts the path exists, it is not a WCAG pass.

Backstop greps (authoring-time, cross-stack)

# Frontend insecure render / client secrets (React + Vue + vanilla)
rg -n 'dangerouslySetInnerHTML|v-html|\.innerHTML\s*=|\beval\(|new Function\('
rg -n 'NEXT_PUBLIC_.*(SECRET|KEY|TOKEN)|VITE_.*(SECRET|KEY)|localStorage\.setItem\([^)]*[Tt]oken'
# String-built SQL (concatenation / interpolation into a query)
rg -n 'query\(.*(\+|\$\{|`).*\)|(SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE|DELETE).*(\+|\$\{)'
# Hardcoded secrets / weak hashing
rg -n 'AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|sk_live_|AIza[0-9A-Za-z_\-]{35}|password\s*=\s*["\x27]|md5\(|sha1\(' .
# Infra: wildcard IAM / open ingress / disabled TLS
rg -n '"Action"\s*:\s*"\*"|"Resource"\s*:\s*"\*"|0\.0\.0\.0/0|InsecureSkipVerify|verify=false|curl.*\| *bash' .
# Raw secret in an agent/MCP/CI config (should be an env-var reference, not a literal)
rg -n '(sk_live_|sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20}|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|ghp_[0-9A-Za-z]{36}|AIza[0-9A-Za-z_\-]{35})' --glob '*.mcp.json' --glob '.mcp.json' --glob '*.env' --glob '**/agent*config*' --glob '.github/workflows/*'
# Swallowed error (empty catch) / unbounded external call (no timeout arg)
rg -n 'catch\s*\([^)]*\)\s*\{\s*\}|except[^:]*:\s*pass' .

Stack-specific patterns (the greps name several ecosystems side by side on purpose): keep the ones for the stack in front of you; a hit means read that line, not auto-fix.

Output format

  1. A one-line per-surface confirmation for the change, e.g. endpoint: authz ✓ tenant-scope ✓ rate-limit wired ✓ validation ✓, naming the file:line where each control lives (or n/a — <reason>).
  2. The backstop grep(s) run for the touched surface(s), with their result (zero hits, or the hit + how it was resolved).
  3. For any control that is genuinely out of scope, an explicit note saying so — never a silent omission.

Gotcha

  • Defined-but-not-wired is the signature AI failure: the rate-limit middleware or CSRF guard is written but never attached to the route. The check is "is it wired on THIS path?", not "does the code exist somewhere?".
  • Semantically-valid-but-ignored: an IaC attribute that the provider silently ignores (a made-up encrypted = true on a resource that doesn't support it) reads as a present control but does nothing — a scanner catches it, a code read does not.
  • A green grep is necessary, not sufficient — it proves the obvious anti-pattern is absent, not that the control is correct. Read the seam for anything security-sensitive.
  • This checklist routes; it does not replace the deep skill. For an auth/billing/tenant/secret path, security-sensitive-stop still requires a threat pass before editing.
  • Run it per surface, not once at the end. In a multi-file / agentic change the omission compounds — each new endpoint, query, or fetch is its own blind spot. Re-run the matching row when each surface lands, not as a single sweep after the whole feature is "done" (by then the missing control is buried under later diffs).

Do NOT

  • Do NOT treat "the prompt didn't ask for it" as a reason to omit a control — that is the exact blind spot.
  • Do NOT mark a change done on a green happy-path test alone.
  • Do NOT auto-rewrite a grep hit without reading it — some are intentional and belong in an allow-list with a reason.
  • Do NOT duplicate the deep skills here — route to them.

Auto-trigger keywords

  • invisible controls
  • ai code blindspots
  • pre-ship checklist
  • what did the AI omit
  • cross-cutting controls

See also

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

event4u-app のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する