本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

api-testing

Use when writing API endpoint tests — integration tests, contract validation, response assertions, mocked external services — even when the user says 'test this route' without naming API testing.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB
  • evals/triggers.json2.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

api-testing

When to use

Use this skill when writing or reviewing API endpoint tests — integration tests, contract validation, response structure checks, or external service mocking.

Procedure: Write API tests

  1. Understand the endpoint — Read the controller, form request, and existing tests. Understand expected behavior, edge cases, and auth requirements before writing anything.
  2. Set up test data — Use seeders (preferred) or factories. Mock external services with Http::fake().
  3. Enumerate test cases — Run the test-case-discovery funnel first; cover success, validation errors, authorization failures, and edge cases — floor per behavior: 1 happy + 1 boundary + 1 error (+1 abuse case; on data-returning endpoints the three broken-access-control negative tests are mandatory).
  4. Assert response — Check status code, JSON structure, data values. Use assertJsonStructure().
  5. Verify — Run the test. Must pass. Check no flaky assertions (no time-dependent, no random ordering).

Example

describe('GET /api/v1/projects', function () {
    it('returns paginated projects for authenticated user', function () {
        $user = loginAsTestUser();

        $response = $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects');

        $response->assertOk()
            ->assertJsonStructure([
                'data' => [['id', 'title', 'status']],
                'meta' => ['current_page', 'per_page', 'total'],
            ]);
    });

    it('returns 401 for unauthenticated request', function () {
        $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects')
            ->assertUnauthorized();
    });

    it('returns 403 when user lacks permission', function () {
        loginAsRestrictedUser();

        $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects')
            ->assertForbidden();
    });
});

Test categories

Happy path

Test the expected success scenario with valid input:

it('creates a project', function () {
    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->postJson('/api/v1/projects', [
        'title' => 'New Project',
        'customer_id' => $customerId,
    ])
        ->assertCreated()
        ->assertJsonPath('data.title', 'New Project');

    $this->assertDatabaseHas('projects', ['title' => 'New Project']);
});

Validation

Test that invalid input is rejected with correct error messages:

it('rejects project without title', function () {
    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->postJson('/api/v1/projects', [
        'customer_id' => $customerId,
    ])
        ->assertUnprocessable()
        ->assertJsonValidationErrors(['title']);
});

Authorization

Test that unauthorized access is blocked:

it('prevents non-owner from updating project', function () {
    $otherUser = loginAsOtherUser();

    $this->putJson("/api/v1/projects/{$project->id}", [
        'title' => 'Hijacked',
    ])
        ->assertForbidden();
});

Edge cases

Test boundary conditions:

it('handles empty collection', function () {
    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects')
        ->assertOk()
        ->assertJsonCount(0, 'data');
});

it('paginates large result sets', function () {
    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->getJson('/api/v1/projects?per_page=5')
        ->assertOk()
        ->assertJsonPath('meta.per_page', 5);
});

Response contract validation

Assert JSON structure

// Verify response shape (keys exist)
$response->assertJsonStructure([
    'data' => ['id', 'title', 'status', 'created_at'],
]);

// Verify exact values
$response->assertJsonPath('data.status', 'active');

// Verify collection count
$response->assertJsonCount(3, 'data');

Assert response types

// When strict typing matters
$data = $response->json('data');
expect($data['id'])->toBeInt();
expect($data['title'])->toBeString();
expect($data['total'])->toBeString(); // Money as string, not float

Filter noisy responses

When a failing test dumps the full JSON body, narrow the diagnosis with jq or grep instead of scrolling the whole payload:

# Extract only the failing assertion path
echo "$RESPONSE_JSON" | jq '.data.status, .errors'

# Targeted log scan
rg --json 'API call failed' storage/logs/laravel.log | jq -r '.data.lines.text'

External service mocking

it('handles external API failure gracefully', function () {
    Http::fake([
        'external-api.com/*' => Http::response(null, 500),
    ]);

    loginAsTestUser();

    $this->postJson('/api/v1/sync')
        ->assertStatus(502)
        ->assertJsonPath('message', 'External service unavailable');
});

Test checklist per endpoint

CategoryTests needed
AuthUnauthenticated (401), unauthorized (403)
ValidationMissing fields, wrong types, boundary values
Happy pathSuccess with valid input, correct status code
ResponseJSON structure, field types, pagination meta
Side effectsDatabase changes, events dispatched, jobs queued
Edge casesEmpty results, large payloads, concurrent access

Bridge to UI verification

API tests cover the contract layer. When an endpoint feeds a UI surface (Livewire component, Blade-rendered page, SPA route), complement the API test with a thin UI probe: a livewire test for wired components, or a Playwright spec / browser screenshot for the rendered shell. Never assume the UI works just because the API test is green.

Output format

  1. Test file in the project’s test framework (Pest, Jest, pytest) covering happy path, validation, auth, and edge cases
  2. Test names as readable sentences describing expected behavior
  3. Mocked external services where applicable

Auto-trigger keywords

  • API test
  • endpoint test
  • integration test
  • response validation
  • contract testing

Gotcha

  • Don't test framework internals (e.g., "does Laravel return 422 on validation error") — test YOUR validation rules.
  • Always seed test data explicitly — don't rely on data from other tests (parallel execution).
  • Mock external APIs with Http::fake() — never hit real services in tests.
  • The model forgets to assert response structure, only checking status codes — always check both.

Do NOT

  • Do not hardcode IDs or timestamps — use factories or seeders.
  • Do not skip auth tests — always test both authenticated and unauthenticated.
  • Do not assert entire JSON responses — assert only meaningful fields.
  • Do not use Http::fake() without also testing the real integration path.

Anti-bruteforce — diagnose before retry

When a test fails, do not retry blindly with tweaked assertions until something passes. Diagnose the root cause first: print the actual response shape once, compare it to the contract, then write a targeted fix. Trial-and-error retries hide real regressions.

Clarification guard — ambiguous contract → ask

If the endpoint contract is ambiguous (unclear status code, optional fields, error envelope shape), do not assume. Ask the user or check the OpenAPI spec / route definition before writing assertions — never guess the response shape from the route name.

The HTTP-assertion idiom, per ecosystem

The examples above are Laravel's. The shape they teach — assert the status, then the body contract, then the side effect, and keep one behavior per test — transfers unchanged; the API does not. Resolve the runner with resolve_toolchain and read its ecosystems:

ecosystemsRequest + assertion surface
php$this->getJson(...) / assertStatus / assertJsonPath
jssupertest or the framework's own test client, with expect(res.status)
pythonhttpx.AsyncClient / framework TestClient; assert res.status_code
gohttptest.NewServer + net/http, or the router's own ServeHTTP

Whatever the surface, the negative tests are not optional: unauthenticated, not-owner and cross-tenant each get their own case, per broken-access-control.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月11日 更新

event4u-app のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する