Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when verifying cross-references between skills, rules, commands, guidelines, and context documents are not broken after edits, renames, or deletions.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use this skill when:
src/check-refs job failed and the broken reference needs to be locatedDo NOT use when:
lint-skills insteadbash scripts/condense.sh --check insteadIdentify whether any artifact was renamed, moved, or removed since the last clean run. Cross-reference checks are relevant only when names or paths shift; pure body edits cannot break references.
Invoke the skill through the runtime dispatcher so the execution: block in
this skill's frontmatter governs the call:
./scripts-run src/scripts/runtime_dispatcher run --skill check-refs
The dispatcher resolves the request, the shell handler runs
./scripts-run src/scripts/check_references, captures stdout/stderr, and returns a
typed ExecutionResult.
Check the returned ExecutionResult:
exit_code: 0 → all cross-references resolveexit_code: 1 → at least one broken reference — read stdout for file,
line, and the offending ref, then fix the source or update the targetstatus: timeout → the checker exceeded timeout_seconds — investigatestatus: error → runner or script missing — confirm ./scripts-run and
src/scripts/check_references.ts are available at the repository rootsuccess | failure | timeout | error, exit code,
duration in millisecondsfile:line → missing-targetstdout for
reviewsrc/scripts/check_references.ts directly when the intent is to
verify the runtime path — always go through the dispatcher so the
ExecutionResult is produced and inspectabletimeout_seconds to mask a slowdown — investigate which part
of the tree grew large enough to push past 60 secondscommand — the handler uses
shell=False and will refuse anything outside pure argv formまだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。