Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says "create context", "document this area", or wants a structured snapshot of a codebase area for agent orientation.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use this skill when:
Do NOT use when:
roadmap-management skill)A context document is a structured snapshot of a codebase area:
Unlike feature plans (future-focused) or roadmaps (task-focused), contexts are present-focused — they describe the current state of the code.
.augment/contexts/ # Shared contexts (about the agent system itself)
├── augment-infrastructure.md
├── skills-and-commands.md
└── documentation-hierarchy.md
agents/settings/contexts/ # Project-wide contexts
├── {context-name}.md
{module_root}/{Module}/{agent_folder}/settings/contexts/ # Module-scoped contexts
├── {context-name}.md # Laravel: app/Modules/…
# Symfony: src/Bundle/…
# Monorepo: packages/…
.augment/templates/
└── contexts.md # Context template
| Type | Scope | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Module | Single module's structure and purpose | client-software.md |
| Domain | Business domain across modules | import-pipeline.md |
| Service | Complex service with its dependencies | customer-service.md |
| Integration | External API/system integration | probaus-api.md |
| Infrastructure | DevOps or infrastructure concern | queue-system.md |
| Knowledge card | Trust-tiered cache of expensive (remote) structural evidence — negative facts + pointers durable, positive structure a hypothesis | lodash.md, stripe-api.md |
| Standards card (Class A) | Coding standards derived from real tooling config — pointer + digest, trust: high (config-derived), auto-refreshed when the config changes; never a flattened claim | coding-standards.md (points at ruff.toml, .editorconfig) |
| Lesson card (Class C) | A learned lesson — symptom (fact) split from hypothesis (decaying theory), trust: low, subject-not-person, anti-calcification decay; promoted only via the human gate (accumulation layer is eval-gated) | agents/memory/curated/lessons/<slug>.md |
| Knowledge page (typed) | Team-shared, lifecycle-typed knowledge that grows while working a project — episodic sessions, semantic concepts, procedures on their way to a skill, small decisions | agents/knowledge/concepts/api-response-shape.md |
| Content | Location |
|---|---|
About the .augment/ system itself | .augment/contexts/ (shared package) |
| Project-wide or cross-module | agents/settings/contexts/ |
| Module-specific | {module_root}/{Module}/{agent_folder}/settings/contexts/ (resolved via modules.root_paths + modules.agent_folder; Laravel example: app/Modules/{Module}/agents/settings/contexts/) |
| Knowledge card (committed) | agents/knowledge/<source>.md — fill from the knowledge-card template |
| Knowledge page (typed, committed) | agents/knowledge/{sessions,concepts,procedures,decisions}/<slug>.md — fill from the knowledge-pages template |
| Evidence Report / probe dumps / absence log (ephemeral) | agents/memory/knowledge/session/ (gitignored, overwritten each task) |
| If unsure | Ask the user |
A knowledge card extends this mechanism for the evidence-first discipline; it
is not a second system. Unlike a normal context (a present-state snapshot a
human curates), a card is governed: it is a cache of expensive remote evidence,
never a source of truth and never a build input. Its trusted core is its
negative facts + pointers (trust: durable); its positive structure is a
per-line, last-verified hypothesis that loads as "Assumed (from card)" and
must be re-confirmed against the live source before use. Cards pass the
check_knowledge_cards.ts pointer-CI (size ≤ 150, mandatory authoritative
pointer, trust tagging, multi-evidence consistency). See
source-discovery for when a structure is
card-worthy and evidence-discipline
for the full model.
Alongside knowledge cards, agents/knowledge/{sessions,concepts,procedures,decisions}/
holds team-shared knowledge that grows while working the project —
coding standards observed, module structure, API endpoint shapes, recurring
mistakes, small decisions not big enough for an ADR. Fill new pages from the
knowledge-pages
template.
Retrieval protocol — index-first, then grep, then read. Read
agents/knowledge/INDEX.md first (one line per page, regenerated by
src/scripts/generate_knowledge_index.ts); grep for keywords second; read
the specific file third. Never enumerate every knowledge file directly —
there is no search infrastructure by design.
A standards card is a present-state context whose claims are derived from
the project's real tooling config (.editorconfig, eslint.config.js,
pint.json, pyproject.toml/ruff.toml, commit-lint, CI lint steps). It is
trust: high (config-derived) — high because the config is the truth, not
because the agent believes it. Each standard is a pointer + digest (value +
source: file:key + scope), never a flattened claim; conflicting configs are
surfaced as two pointers, never merged. The digest is regenerated when a
source config's mtime/hash changes (auto-refresh, no human gate — Class A is
deterministic) and is read for heuristics only, never to bypass a fresh
structural read. Build it with the
standards-from-config skill; store under
agents/settings/contexts/.
.augment/contexts/ — Part of the shared package. Describes the agent infrastructure:
how overrides work, what skills/commands exist, the documentation hierarchy.
These are read-only at project level (like all .augment/ content).
agents/settings/contexts/ — Project-specific. Describes the project's business domain:
modules, services, integrations, database architecture.
These are created and maintained per project.
When working in an area that has a context document, load it at session start. The session's Context section can reference it.
Before planning a feature, check if a context document exists for the affected area. It provides the baseline understanding needed for planning.
/module-explore gathers the data needed to create a module context.
/context-create turns that exploration into a persistent document.
When customizing a shared skill or command, read .augment/contexts/override-system.md for the naming conventions and format.
When working on the agent infrastructure itself (skills, commands, rules), check
.augment/contexts/ for existing documentation about the system.
codebase-retrieval, view, and file listing.Last Updated when modifying./context-refactor is the dedicated command for this.| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
context-create | Analyze an area and create a new context document |
context-refactor | Revisit, update, and extend an existing context |
AGENTS.md — reference it instead.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。