Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use during or right after an incident — frames severity, sets comms cadence, drafts the post-mortem skeleton — even when the user just says 'production is down' or 'wir haben einen Vorfall'.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Run the coordination layer during an incident: classify severity, set comms cadence, hold a clean timeline, and draft the post-mortem skeleton when the dust settles. This skill does not debug the system — that is the engineer's job. The commander keeps the room oriented so the engineer can think.
Do NOT use when:
risk-officer instead./bug-investigate and
/bug-fix. The commander coordinates; engineers debug.threat-modeling first; the
commander still runs comms but the response shape changes.| SEV | Trigger |
|---|---|
| SEV-1 | User-facing outage, data loss risk, revenue impact |
| SEV-2 | Major degradation, workaround exists |
| SEV-3 | Single-feature broken, low blast radius |
| SEV-4 | Internal-only, not user-visible |
Pick the highest SEV any signal supports. Downgrades happen later with evidence; never start low to avoid noise.
Append-only log: timestamp + actor + observation. No edits, no "actually it was earlier" — corrections are new entries. Drives the post-mortem and prevents memory rewrite.
During the incident, the question is "what makes the bleeding stop?" Root cause is for after. Document the gap explicitly — "mitigated, root cause unknown" is a valid intermediate state.
Once stable:
Hand off the skeleton; the engineer fills root cause and the team adds action items.
Before declaring the incident handed off, verify: SEV is set, comms
cadence is announced, the timeline has at least one entry per
update, mitigation state is explicit (active / mitigated /
resolved), and a post-mortem owner is assigned. Ensure no field
is left as the placeholder default.
The incident record is a single block with these ordered fields:
SEV: — one of 1 / 2 / 3 / 4State: — one of active / mitigated / resolved / post-mortemStarted: and Channel: — timestamp and single thread/roomCadence: and Timeline: — update interval and append-only logMitigation:, Root cause:, Post-mortem owner: — explicit values
or unknown; never blankIncident
SEV: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
State: active | mitigated | resolved | post-mortem
Started: <timestamp>
Channel: <thread / room>
Cadence: <interval>
Timeline (append-only):
- <ts> <actor> <observation>
- ...
Mitigation: <action> | unknown
Root cause: <hypothesis> | unknown — investigation deferred to post-mortem
Post-mortem owner: <role>
alerting-doctrine — what earned the page
that opened this incident, and the runbook contract the first responder reads.
A page arrives with an owner, a runbook and a first diagnostic step; if it did
not, that is a configuration defect to record in the post-mortem.logging-monitoring — the signal posture the
incident is being diagnosed through, and why a proposed threshold is not a
breach.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。