Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When writing validation — Form Requests, rules, custom rule objects, request-boundary design — even when the user just says 'validate this input' or 'check the request' without naming it.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use when creating FormRequests, validation rules, or custom rule objects.
Do NOT use when:
security skill)api-design skill){Action}{Entity}Request — e.g. CreateProjectRequest.authorize() using Policies.rules() with array syntax — never pipe-separated.prepareForValidation() only when normalization is truly necessary.Illuminate\Validation\Rules classes where possible.→ See guideline php/validations.md for array syntax, route params, property mapping, custom rules.
required ≠ not nullable — required means present, nullable means value can be null.$fail callback, not throw exceptions.$request->all() — use $request->validated().Confirm new rules with a concrete probe: a Pest feature test that POSTs with curl-shaped payloads through the browser/HTTP client, or a phpunit/pest run against the FormRequest. Add at least one negative case per rule (missing, wrong type, boundary). Never claim rules work without running them.
When a rule fires unexpectedly, do not blindly toggle required / nullable / sometimes until tests pass. Print $request->all() once, compare against the rule set, identify the root cause, then make a targeted fix.
If a field's intent is unclear (is tags a CSV string, an array, or JSON? is email required at create or only at update?), ask the user or check the existing schema / API contract before guessing. Hidden assumptions in validation rules surface as production 422s.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。