Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when optimizing application performance — caching strategies, eager loading, query optimization, Redis patterns, or background job design.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Use when optimizing slow endpoints, designing caching, or improving query performance.
Do NOT use when:
database skill)jobs-events skill)DB::enableQueryLog() or Telescope to find slow queries.Performance complexity is a claim, and a claim needs evidence. No cache layer, no denormalised column, no materialised view, no read replica ships on "this will be slow" — it ships on a profile, a query log, or a timing that names the bottleneck. The added complexity is permanent (invalidation bugs, stale reads, a second source of truth); the speedup is hypothetical until measured. State the measurement in the change, or do not add the mechanism.
Carve-out — this does not override the scale-discipline floor. Where that
pack is installed, R-A2 mandates an index on every FK and every WHERE / ORDER
BY column, and R-A4 governs duplicated data by waiver. Those are structural
defaults that ship with the query, not optimisations awaiting a profiler; the
evidence gate above applies to added mechanisms (caches, denormalisation,
replicas, bespoke indexes beyond parity), never to the floor's baseline.
| Bottleneck | Fix |
|---|---|
| N+1 queries | Eager loading with with() |
| Slow queries | Add indexes, optimize (see database skill) |
| Repeated expensive queries | Cache with TTL |
| Blocking API calls | Queue as background job |
| Large datasets | Paginate, chunk, cursor |
| Missing counts | withCount() instead of loading relations |
Re-measure after fix. Check that cache invalidation works correctly.
→ See guideline php/performance.md for caching patterns, Redis, response time targets.
get() or all() on large tables — paginate or chunk.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。