本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

spreadsheet-authoring

Use when building or editing a spreadsheet or model — formulas over hardcoded values, read-back after writes, official-source data, pivot-first charts. Triggers on 'spreadsheet', 'build a model'.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB
  • evals/triggers.json1.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

spreadsheet-authoring

The spreadsheet surface's correctness floor (per surface-agent-contracts): a spreadsheet's truth source is the formula read-back, not a plausible table of numbers. A cell that holds a hardcoded computed value is a latent lie — it silently goes stale the moment an input changes.

When to use

  • Building or editing a spreadsheet / financial model (SaaS, ops, budget, forecast).
  • Charting raw tabular data.
  • Entering web-sourced or financial figures into cells.

Do NOT use for: per-customer unit-economics reasoning (route to unit-economics-modeling), runway shape (route to runway-cognition), or a prose document/table (that is the document surface, doc-coauthoring).

Procedure

  1. Detect the surface + capability. Confirm a spreadsheet is the right surface (not a prose table). Confirm native spreadsheet tooling is available; if not, see § Capability-aware degradation.
  2. Formulas over hardcoded values. Any computed cell holds a formula (=SUM(...), =B2*C2), never the typed-in result. Hardcoding a computed value is the cardinal spreadsheet defect — it does not recalculate.
  3. Read back after every write, and RECALCULATE first. After writing a formula, force a recalculation, then read the cell back — a library that writes formulas without recalculating leaves the cached value stale, so a read-back before recalc proves nothing. The zero-formula-error contract: any of #REF! / #DIV/0! / #VALUE! / #N/A / #NAME? in a written cell is a failure, not a warning — reject the output and fix the formula. The recalc'd read-back is the spreadsheet's verification truth source. Formulas, never hardcoded computed values — a library that writes the Python-computed number into the cell instead of the = formula has produced a dead spreadsheet that will not update when inputs change; write the formula string and let the recalc compute it.
  4. Source-comment web-sourced cells. Any figure taken from the web carries a cell comment with its source. Financial figures follow the spreadsheet-source-quality rule (official sources first; aggregators need permission + unofficial marking).
  5. Expand ranges on structural edits. After inserting a row/column inside a formula's range, expand the range (or use a whole-column / table reference) so the new data is included — verified by read-back.
  6. Pivot-first charting. Chart from a pivot/aggregate of raw data, not directly from hundreds of raw transactional rows.
  7. Bulk range operations over manual cell loops. Prefer a single range formula / fill over hand-editing cells one by one.

Capability-aware degradation

  • Native tooling present → write + read back formulas directly.
  • Only exported files + a parser present → operate on the exported file; state that formulas were written into the export, and what the target app will recompute on open.
  • Neither → do NOT pretend formulas were written or read back. Say plainly what cannot be verified on this host, and deliver the formula definitions + the layout as a durable plan the user applies in their spreadsheet app.

Output format

  1. The spreadsheet / model — cells carrying formulas (not baked values), source comments on sourced cells, pivots feeding charts.
  2. assumptions.md — every input value, sourced or marked assumption; the official-vs-unofficial status of each financial figure.
  3. verification-note.md — which cells were read back, any formula errors found + fixed, and — on a degraded host — exactly what could not be verified.

Gotcha

  • Hardcoding a computed value instead of a formula is the #1 spreadsheet defect: it looks right today and is silently wrong after the next input change.
  • A formula range not expanded after a row insert silently drops the new row from every downstream total.
  • Charting straight off a raw transactional table (no pivot) produces an unreadable chart and hides the data's real shape.
  • An aggregator/news figure entered as if it were official financial data is a sourcing defect even when the number happens to be right — see spreadsheet-source-quality.
  • On a host without spreadsheet tooling, claiming "formulas written + verified" is a fabricated verification (never do it — degrade honestly).

Do NOT

  • Do NOT write a computed value where a formula belongs.
  • Do NOT enter a financial figure from an aggregator/news/social source as official without the user's explicit permission + a cell-level unofficial mark.
  • Do NOT claim a formula was read back / verified on a host that cannot open the spreadsheet — say what could not be verified instead.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月12日 更新

Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月12日 更新

Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月12日 更新

Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月12日 更新

Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月12日 更新

Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

event4u-app/agent-config112026年10月12日 更新

event4u-app のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する