Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building or editing a spreadsheet or model — formulas over hardcoded values, read-back after writes, official-source data, pivot-first charts. Triggers on 'spreadsheet', 'build a model'.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
The spreadsheet surface's correctness floor (per
surface-agent-contracts): a spreadsheet's truth source is the formula read-back, not a plausible table of numbers. A cell that holds a hardcoded computed value is a latent lie — it silently goes stale the moment an input changes.
Do NOT use for: per-customer unit-economics reasoning (route to
unit-economics-modeling), runway shape (route to runway-cognition), or a
prose document/table (that is the document surface, doc-coauthoring).
=SUM(...), =B2*C2), never the typed-in result. Hardcoding a computed
value is the cardinal spreadsheet defect — it does not recalculate.#REF! / #DIV/0! / #VALUE! / #N/A / #NAME? in a written cell
is a failure, not a warning — reject the output and fix the formula. The
recalc'd read-back is the spreadsheet's verification truth source.
Formulas, never hardcoded computed values — a library that writes the
Python-computed number into the cell instead of the = formula has produced
a dead spreadsheet that will not update when inputs change; write the formula
string and let the recalc compute it.spreadsheet-source-quality rule
(official sources first; aggregators need permission + unofficial marking).assumptions.md — every input value, sourced or marked assumption;
the official-vs-unofficial status of each financial figure.verification-note.md — which cells were read back, any formula errors
found + fixed, and — on a degraded host — exactly what could not be verified.spreadsheet-source-quality.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。