Babysits an open GitHub PR until merge-ready. Use when asked to watch a PR over time — not for one-shot comment resolution or one CI failure. GitHub (incl. Enterprise) only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft launch or promotion copy for a shipped feature.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Turn a feature that just shipped into copy-pasteable, user-facing announcement copy, right inside the engineering workflow — so the messaging doesn't wait for a separate marketing pass.
Done when: every drafted channel is presented as a labeled, copy-pasteable block and the user has been offered a revision. This skill drafts only — it never posts, publishes, schedules, commits, or opens PRs. Posting is a human action.
It works with or without Spiral: with nothing installed it drafts directly from the editorial and social fundamentals in Path B (Direct drafting). When the Spiral CLI is present and authed, drafts come back voice-matched to the user's brand — an enhancement, never a requirement.
A free-form description in the arguments is the source of truth. Otherwise derive it from context, using what is available and never waiting on any single source:
gh pr view --json title,body,url (the title and body usually state the user-facing value)git diff main...HEAD --stat, skimming notable changes so the claim is grounded in what actually changed[Unreleased] entry in docs/changelog.md, CHANGELOG.md, or similargit log --oneline -15 for the arc of the changeThen write a 1-3 sentence summary of the user-facing value: what a user can now do that they couldn't before, and why they'd care. Outcome, not implementation — "You can now export any report to CSV in one click", not "Added a CsvSerializer and an export endpoint." If you can't confidently tell what shipped, ask one short question rather than guessing.
Default to an X post (or short thread) plus a one-line changelog / release blurb. If the user named channels — LinkedIn, email, a blog intro, a demo script — draft those instead of or in addition to the defaults. Scale to the change: a small fix warrants one or two short drafts, a flagship feature a cross-channel set. Don't force a fixed template.
Detect Spiral's state with two quick, non-blocking commands:
which spiral
spiral auth status --json 2>/dev/null
"authenticated": true -> Ready"authenticated": false -> Unauthed--json) -> ready iff it contains spiral_sk_, else unauthedReady -> Path A (Spiral ready). Absent or Unauthed -> Path 0 (Offer Spiral setup), then Path A if setup completes, else Path B (Direct drafting). Never let a Spiral failure, timeout, or odd output block or slow the skill — when in doubt, treat it as not-ready and continue.
Go straight to Path B when running non-interactively — there is no human to answer. Otherwise offer setup once: read references/spiral-cli.md and follow its Path 0 section for the opt-out check, the blocking question, the agent-run spiral login --json flow (the API key never passes through the agent, and the user never pastes one into chat), the install path, and how the opt-out is recorded. Skip to Path B only when that check finds a recorded opt-out. That section defines what counts as recorded; a naive config scan misreads ce-setup's commented template example as one, silently suppressing the offer.
Two properties that section depends on: any dismissal records the opt-out, so a single first-run decline stops the offer for good in this repo, and a decline always proceeds to Path B rather than blocking. If a human is present but no blocking-question tool is in the current tool list, fall back to a numbered list of the two options in chat and wait — do not skip the offer, and never call a user-facing question tool to discover whether one exists.
Read references/spiral-cli.md before composing the prompt. Whether Spiral returns a multi-channel set or several variations of one channel is phrasing-driven (channel keywords and cue words vs. --num-drafts), and getting it wrong silently returns the wrong number or shape of drafts — don't restate those rules from memory.
Always pass --instant and --json; parse drafts[] (each carries its own channel) plus session_id. Present every returned draft, grouped by channel — Spiral decides how many drafts per channel, so never assume one-per-channel or drop extras. If the spiral write call errors or returns no usable drafts, fall back silently to Path B for the affected channels.
No Spiral needed. Draft every channel through the ce-noslop skill. (The Spiral path goes further: brand-voice matching, humanization, saved styles, and cross-channel campaign orchestration.)
Every channel:
Distributed channels: the first line is the hook and has to make the reader want the next line (feeds truncate). No preamble. Match each channel's native shape and length; never reuse one draft verbatim across channels. One clear CTA where the channel supports it. Hashtags 0-2, and only where the channel expects them.
Per channel:
One strong draft per channel by default; produce more only when asked ("3 tweet options"), capped at ~3.
Show every draft as a clean, copy-pasteable block labeled by channel:
### X post
<the copy>
When Path A produced them, also show the session_id and each draft's url so the user can open and tweak them in the Spiral web app. Offer to revise (tone, length, angle, more variations, another channel). Do not post, publish, schedule, commit, or open a PR — end by reminding the user the drafts are theirs to ship.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Babysits an open GitHub PR until merge-ready. Use when asked to watch a PR over time — not for one-shot comment resolution or one CI failure. GitHub (incl. Enterprise) only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop independent competing solutions to a defined brief, compare them, and synthesize a winning approach. Use when choosing well requires developing alternatives beyond their current form. Use ce-pov to judge developed material and ce-ideate to discover opportunities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore vague or ambitious ideas into a right-sized requirements-only unified plan. Use when the user wants to brainstorm or scope what to build. Not for executing already-specified work. Use ce-pov for a verdict on adopting a named external technology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a named diff or PR for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use when asked to review code or when a shipping skill needs a review receipt. Use when asked to apply this review's findings locally. Use ce-resolve-pr-feedback for feedback already left on a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a git commit with a clear, value-communicating message. Use when the user asks to commit/save staged or unstaged changes with a repo-appropriate message.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Commit, push, and open a PR. Use when asked to ship/open a PR, or for PR-description-only flows like writing, rewriting, or describing a PR body.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。