本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ce-test-xcode

Test iOS apps in a simulator with XcodeBuildMCP. Use when iOS changes need simulator evidence before handoff.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md2.0 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml43 B
  • references/setup-and-build.md2.0 KB
  • references/test-and-report.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Xcode Simulator Test

Build and exercise an iOS app on a simulator, preserving screenshots, logs, human-verification results, and failures as evidence for the user.

Done:

  • A completed run reports overall PASS, FAIL, or PARTIAL plus project, scheme, simulator, build result, per-surface PASS / FAIL / SKIP, console errors, human checks, and residual failures.
  • Per-surface status is derived from evidence, not the user's routing choice. PASS requires completed passing evidence. FAIL records observed failing evidence until a completed retest replaces it. SKIP means the check has no completed outcome.
  • The overall result is FAIL while any failure remains, PARTIAL when no failure remains but a scoped check is skipped, and otherwise PASS.
  • Any failure before the app is launched with log capture running stops later stages and reports an actionable setup blocker with its evidence.

Boundaries: this skill tests and reports. Diagnosis and any user-approved product fix belong to ce-debug, invoked with its authority narrowed so it returns here without committing, pushing, or opening a PR. Keep simulator interaction within the app and flows the user placed in scope.

Run

  1. Prepare and launch. Read references/setup-and-build.md. It defines the XcodeBuildMCP availability check, project and scheme discovery, simulator choice, build, install, launch, and log-capture start.
  2. Exercise and report. After launch, read references/test-and-report.md. It defines per-screen evidence, human-only flows, the SwiftUI inline-link automation limitation, what to do when a check fails, cleanup, and the fixed summary fields.

Do not replace either required read with remembered tool names. XcodeBuildMCP adapters differ by host, while their observable success conditions do not.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Babysits an open GitHub PR until merge-ready. Use when asked to watch a PR over time — not for one-shot comment resolution or one CI failure. GitHub (incl. Enterprise) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.5万2026年10月10日 更新

Develop independent competing solutions to a defined brief, compare them, and synthesize a winning approach. Use when choosing well requires developing alternatives beyond their current form. Use ce-pov to judge developed material and ce-ideate to discover opportunities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.5万2026年10月10日 更新

Explore vague or ambitious ideas into a right-sized requirements-only unified plan. Use when the user wants to brainstorm or scope what to build. Not for executing already-specified work. Use ce-pov for a verdict on adopting a named external technology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.5万2026年10月10日 更新

Review a named diff or PR for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use when asked to review code or when a shipping skill needs a review receipt. Use when asked to apply this review's findings locally. Use ce-resolve-pr-feedback for feedback already left on a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.5万2026年10月10日 更新

ce-commit

無料

Create a git commit with a clear, value-communicating message. Use when the user asks to commit/save staged or unstaged changes with a repo-appropriate message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.5万2026年10月10日 更新

Commit, push, and open a PR. Use when asked to ship/open a PR, or for PR-description-only flows like writing, rewriting, or describing a PR body.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin2.5万2026年10月10日 更新

EveryInc のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する