本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

axum-code-review

Reviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB
  • references/extractors.md6.0 KB
  • references/middleware.md4.9 KB
  • references/routing.md3.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Axum Code Review

Review Workflow

  1. Check Cargo.toml — Note axum version (0.6 vs 0.7+ have different patterns), Rust edition (2021 vs 2024), tower, tower-http features. Edition 2024 changes RPIT lifetime capture in handler return types and removes the need for async-trait in custom extractors.
  2. Check routing — Route organization, method routing, nested routers
  3. Check extractors — Order matters (body extractors must be last), correct types
  4. Check state — Shared state via State<T>, not global mutable state
  5. Check error handling — IntoResponse implementations, error types

Gates (before reporting findings)

Run in order. Do not write a finding until the step that applies has passed.

  1. Version and edition on disk — Pass when: You have read the relevant Cargo.toml (crate or workspace root) and can state axum (and related tower/tower-http) versions and Rust edition. Then apply 0.6 vs 0.7+ or Edition 2024–specific checklist items only when that file supports them.

  2. Per-finding evidence — Pass when: Each issue cites [FILE:LINE] from the current tree for the handler, router, layer, or type under review (not from memory, docs-only, or another branch).

  3. Category check vs protocol — Pass when: For the finding type (routing conflict, extractor order, error leak, middleware order, etc.), you ran the matching checks from the review-verification-protocol skill (e.g. full handler signature for extractor order; surrounding error mapping before “raw error to client”). Then add the finding.

  4. Output shape — Pass when: The report lines match Output Format below (severity + description).

Output Format

Report findings as:

[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Route definitions, nesting, method routingreferences/routing.md
State, Path, Query, Json, body extractorsreferences/extractors.md
Tower middleware, layers, error handlingreferences/middleware.md

Review Checklist

Routing

  • Routes organized by domain (nested routers for /api/users, /api/orders)
  • Fallback handlers defined for 404s
  • Method routing explicit (.get(), .post(), not .route() with manual method matching)
  • No route conflicts (overlapping paths with different extractors)

Extractors

  • Body-consuming extractors (Json, Form, Bytes) are the LAST parameter
  • State<T> requires T: Clone — typically Arc<AppState> or direct Clone derive
  • Path<T> parameter types match the route definition
  • Query<T> fields are Option for optional query params with #[serde(default)]
  • Custom extractors implement FromRequestParts (not body) or FromRequest (body)
  • Edition 2024: Custom extractors use native async fn in trait impls (no #[async_trait] needed for FromRequest/FromRequestParts)

State Management

  • Application state shared via State<T>, not global mutable statics
  • Database pool in state (not created per-request)
  • State contains only shared resources (pool, config, channels), not request-specific data
  • Clone derived or manually implemented on state type
  • Edition 2024: Shared static state uses LazyLock from std (not once_cell::sync::Lazy or lazy_static!)

Error Handling

  • Handler errors implement IntoResponse for proper HTTP error codes
  • Internal errors don't leak to clients (no raw error messages in 500 responses)
  • Error responses use consistent format (JSON error body with code/message)
  • Result<impl IntoResponse, AppError> pattern used for handlers
  • Edition 2024: Handler return types -> impl IntoResponse capture all in-scope lifetimes by default; use + use<> to opt out of capturing request lifetimes when returning owned data

Middleware

  • Tower layers applied in correct order (outer runs first on request, last on response)
  • tower-http used for common concerns (CORS, compression, tracing, timeout)
  • Request-scoped data passed via extensions, not global state
  • Middleware errors don't panic — they return error responses
  • Edition 2024: Middleware using #[async_trait] can migrate to native async fn in trait impls

Severity Calibration

Critical

  • Body extractor not last in handler parameters (silently consumes body, later extractors fail)
  • SQL injection via path/query parameters passed directly to queries
  • Internal error details leaked to clients (stack traces, database errors)
  • Missing authentication middleware on protected routes

Major

  • Global mutable state instead of State<T> (race conditions)
  • Missing error type conversion (raw sqlx::Error returned to client)
  • Missing request timeout (handlers can hang indefinitely)
  • Route conflicts causing unexpected 405s
  • Edition 2024: async-trait still used for FromRequest/FromRequestParts when native async fn works

Minor

  • Manual route method matching instead of .get(), .post()
  • Missing fallback handler (default 404 is plain text, not JSON)
  • Middleware applied per-route when it should be global (or vice versa)
  • Missing tower-http::trace for request logging
  • Edition 2024: once_cell::sync::Lazy or lazy_static! used where std::sync::LazyLock works

Informational

  • Suggestions to use tower-http layers for common concerns
  • Router organization improvements
  • Suggestions to add OpenAPI documentation via utoipa or aide

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

  • #[axum::debug_handler] on handlers — Debugging aid that improves compile error messages
  • Extension<T> for middleware-injected data — Valid pattern for request-scoped values
  • Returning impl IntoResponse from handlers — More flexible than concrete types
  • Router::new() per module, merged in main — Standard organization pattern
  • ServiceBuilder for layer composition — Tower pattern, not over-engineering
  • axum::serve with TcpListener — Standard axum 0.7+ server setup
  • Native async fn in FromRequest/FromRequestParts impls — async-trait crate no longer needed (stable since Rust 1.75)
  • + use<'a> on handler return types — Edition 2024 precise capture syntax for RPIT
  • std::sync::LazyLock for shared static state — Replaces once_cell/lazy_static (stable since Rust 1.80)

Before Submitting Findings

Complete Gates (before reporting findings) and load the review-verification-protocol skill for category-specific checks before any issue is final.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

existential-birds のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する