本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

cloudkit-code-review

Reviews CloudKit code for container setup, record handling, subscriptions, and sharing patterns. Use when reviewing code with import CloudKit, CKContainer, CKRecord, CKShare, or CKSubscription.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB
  • references/container-setup.md3.8 KB
  • references/records.md4.6 KB
  • references/sharing.md5.8 KB
  • references/subscriptions.md5.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

CloudKit Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
CKContainer, databases, zones, entitlementsreferences/container-setup.md
CKRecord, references, assets, batch operationsreferences/records.md
CKSubscription, push notifications, silent syncreferences/subscriptions.md
CKShare, participants, permissions, acceptancereferences/sharing.md

Review Checklist

  • Account status checked before private/shared database operations
  • Custom zones used (not default zone) for production data
  • All CloudKit errors handled with retryAfterSeconds respected
  • serverRecordChanged conflicts handled with proper merge logic
  • CKErrorPartialFailure parsed for individual record errors
  • Batch operations used (CKModifyRecordsOperation) not individual saves
  • Large binary data stored as CKAsset (records have 1MB limit)
  • Record keys type-safe (enums) not string literals
  • UI updates dispatched to main thread from callbacks
  • CKAccountChangedNotification observed for account switches
  • Subscriptions have unique IDs to prevent duplicates
  • CKShare uses custom zone (sharing requires custom zones)

When to Load References

  • Reviewing container/database setup or zones -> container-setup.md
  • Reviewing record CRUD or relationships -> records.md
  • Reviewing push notifications or sync triggers -> subscriptions.md
  • Reviewing sharing or collaboration features -> sharing.md

Output Format

Report issues using: [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE

Examples:

  • [AppDelegate.swift:24] CKContainer not in custom zone
  • [SyncManager.swift:156] Unhandled CKErrorPartialFailure
  • [DataStore.swift:89] Missing retryAfterSeconds backoff

Review Questions

  1. What happens when the user is signed out of iCloud?
  2. Does error handling respect rate limiting (retryAfterSeconds)?
  3. Are conflicts resolved or does data get overwritten silently?
  4. Is the schema deployed to production before App Store release?
  5. Are shared records in custom zones (required for CKShare)?

Hard gates (before reporting)

Complete in order for each finding you intend to report. Do not advance until the pass condition is satisfied.

  1. Location artifact — The finding includes [FILE:LINE] (or a line range) copied from the current file contents; the path resolves in this repo.
  2. Scope read — You read the full surrounding unit: the type or function that owns the CloudKit work (for example the CKOperation subclass usage, completion handler chain, or CKRecord lifecycle), not only a diff hunk or isolated snippet.
  3. CloudKit or deployment claim (only if the finding depends on container identifiers, public vs private database choice, custom zone requirement, iCloud account state, entitlements, or production schema) — You name one concrete artifact you inspected (for example com.apple.developer.icloud-container-environment or container ID in the entitlements file, CKContainer.default() vs custom identifier in source, Info.plist / target capability, or evidence that schema is deployed) or you downgrade the item to an open question in Review Questions.
  4. Protocol — Pre-report steps in review-verification-protocol are satisfied for this item (no finding if they are not).

Use the issue format [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE for each reported finding. Hard gate 4 is the full pre-report checklist for this skill’s review type.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

existential-birds のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する