本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

create-pr

create a pull request with standardized description template

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Create Pull Request

Create a pull request with a well-structured description based on the branch changes.

Instructions

Gates (run in order)

Do not draft or run gh pr create until each step passes.

  1. Branch gate: git branch --show-current is not the default branch (main, master, or the repo’s documented default). Pass: branch name is printed and satisfies this.
  2. Evidence gate: You have run the commands in Gather Context for the same main..HEAD (or origin/main..HEAD if local main is missing) range you will summarize. Pass: you can name at least one commit subject and one area of files changed without inventing details.
  3. Template gate: The final PR title and body contain no unreplaced placeholders (<...>, TODO, TBD). Optional sections with no content are removed, not left as stubs. Pass: a quick scan finds no angle-bracket placeholders or filler tokens.
  4. Create gate: gh pr create exits successfully and prints a PR URL (or the PR number/URL from gh output). Pass: URL (or id) is recorded; if the command fails, do not claim the PR was created.

1. Gather Context

First, collect information about the changes:

# Get current branch and verify it's not main
git branch --show-current

# Get commit history for this branch
git log --oneline main..HEAD

# Get detailed commit messages for context
git log --format="### %s%n%n%b" main..HEAD

# Get file change statistics
git diff --stat main..HEAD

# Get the actual diff for understanding changes
git diff main..HEAD

2. Analyze the Changes

Based on the gathered information, determine:

  • What changed: Categorize changes (features, fixes, refactors, docs, tests)
  • Why it changed: Infer motivation from commit messages and code changes
  • Impact: Breaking changes, new dependencies, migrations needed
  • Testing: What tests were added/modified, how to verify manually

3. Check for Related Issues

Look for issue references:

  • In commit messages (e.g., "fixes #123", "closes #456")
  • In branch name (e.g., fix/issue-123-description)
  • In code comments or TODOs addressed

4. Generate PR Description

Create the PR using this template structure:

gh pr create --title "<type>(<scope>): <description>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary

<1-3 sentence overview of what this PR does and why>

## Changes

<Categorized bullet list of changes>

### Added
- <new features or capabilities>

### Changed
- <modifications to existing functionality>

### Fixed
- <bug fixes>

### Removed
- <deprecated or removed functionality>

## Motivation

<Why were these changes needed? What problem does this solve?>

## Testing

<How was this tested?>

- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing performed

### Manual Testing Steps

<If applicable, steps to manually verify the changes>

## Breaking Changes

<If any, describe what breaks and migration path. Remove section if none.>

## Related Issues

<Link to related issues. Remove section if none.>

- Closes #<issue_number>
- Related to #<issue_number>

## Checklist

- [ ] Code follows project style guidelines
- [ ] Self-review completed
- [ ] Tests pass locally
- [ ] Linting passes
- [ ] Documentation updated (if needed)
EOF
)"

Optionally append a footer trailer per project convention (e.g. a tool-attribution line). Omit it when the project has no such convention.

5. Title Format

Use conventional commit format for the PR title:

  • feat(scope): add new feature
  • fix(scope): correct bug behavior
  • refactor(scope): restructure without behavior change
  • docs(scope): update documentation
  • test(scope): add or modify tests
  • chore(scope): maintenance tasks

6. Apply Labels

After creating the PR, apply appropriate labels based on the changes. Use gh pr edit <number> --add-label <label>.

Check the repository's available labels first:

gh label list

Common Type Labels

LabelWhen to Use
enhancementNew features, capabilities, or improvements
bugBug fixes
documentationDocumentation-only changes
breaking-changeUser-facing breaking changes requiring migration

Breaking Change Criteria

Only apply breaking-change for user-facing changes that require users to modify their:

  • Configuration files
  • CLI invocations
  • API integrations

Do NOT apply for internal refactors unless they affect external consumers.

7. After Creation

After creating the PR:

  1. Display the PR URL with applied labels
  2. Suggest adding reviewers if appropriate
  3. Note if any CI checks need to pass

Guidelines

DO:

  • Be specific about what changed and why
  • Include testing evidence
  • Link related issues
  • Note breaking changes prominently
  • Remove empty optional sections

DON'T:

  • Include irrelevant commits (keep PR focused)
  • Leave placeholder text in the description
  • Skip the testing section
  • Create PRs without running local checks first

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

existential-birds のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する