本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

pydantic-ai-testing

Test PydanticAI agents using TestModel, FunctionModel, VCR cassettes, and inline snapshots. Use when writing unit tests, mocking LLM responses, or recording API interactions.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Testing PydanticAI Agents

TestModel (Deterministic Testing)

Use TestModel for tests without API calls:

import pytest
from pydantic_ai import Agent
from pydantic_ai.models.test import TestModel

def test_agent_basic():
    agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')

    # Override with TestModel for testing
    result = agent.run_sync('Hello', model=TestModel())

    # TestModel generates deterministic output based on output_type
    assert isinstance(result.output, str)

TestModel Configuration

from pydantic_ai.models.test import TestModel

# Custom text output
model = TestModel(custom_output_text='Custom response')
result = agent.run_sync('Hello', model=model)
assert result.output == 'Custom response'

# Custom structured output (for output_type agents)
from pydantic import BaseModel

class Response(BaseModel):
    message: str
    score: int

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', output_type=Response)
model = TestModel(custom_output_args={'message': 'Test', 'score': 42})
result = agent.run_sync('Hello', model=model)
assert result.output.message == 'Test'

# Seed for reproducible random output
model = TestModel(seed=42)

# Force tool calls
model = TestModel(call_tools=['my_tool', 'another_tool'])

Override Context Manager

from pydantic_ai import Agent
from pydantic_ai.models.test import TestModel

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', deps_type=MyDeps)

def test_with_override():
    mock_deps = MyDeps(db=MockDB())

    with agent.override(model=TestModel(), deps=mock_deps):
        # All runs use TestModel and mock_deps
        result = agent.run_sync('Hello')
        assert result.output

FunctionModel (Custom Logic)

For complete control over model responses:

from pydantic_ai import Agent, ModelMessage, ModelResponse, TextPart
from pydantic_ai.models.function import AgentInfo, FunctionModel

def custom_model(
    messages: list[ModelMessage],
    info: AgentInfo
) -> ModelResponse:
    """Custom model that inspects messages and returns response."""
    # Access the last user message
    last_msg = messages[-1]

    # Return custom response
    return ModelResponse(parts=[TextPart('Custom response')])

agent = Agent(FunctionModel(custom_model))
result = agent.run_sync('Hello')

FunctionModel with Tool Calls

from pydantic_ai import ToolCallPart, ModelResponse
from pydantic_ai.models.function import AgentInfo, FunctionModel

def model_with_tools(
    messages: list[ModelMessage],
    info: AgentInfo
) -> ModelResponse:
    # First request: call a tool
    if len(messages) == 1:
        return ModelResponse(parts=[
            ToolCallPart(
                tool_name='get_data',
                args='{"id": 123}'
            )
        ])

    # After tool response: return final result
    return ModelResponse(parts=[TextPart('Done with tool result')])

agent = Agent(FunctionModel(model_with_tools))

@agent.tool_plain
def get_data(id: int) -> str:
    return f"Data for {id}"

result = agent.run_sync('Get data')

VCR Cassettes (Recorded API Calls)

Record and replay real LLM API interactions:

import pytest

@pytest.mark.vcr
def test_with_recorded_response():
    """Uses recorded cassette from tests/cassettes/"""
    agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')
    result = agent.run_sync('Hello')
    assert 'hello' in result.output.lower()

# To record/update cassettes:
# uv run pytest --record-mode=rewrite tests/test_file.py

Cassette files are stored in tests/cassettes/ as YAML.

Inline Snapshots

Assert expected outputs with auto-updating snapshots:

from inline_snapshot import snapshot

def test_agent_output():
    result = agent.run_sync('Hello', model=TestModel())

    # First run: creates snapshot
    # Subsequent runs: asserts against it
    assert result.output == snapshot('expected output here')

# Update snapshots:
# uv run pytest --inline-snapshot=fix

Gates: VCR cassettes and inline snapshots

Recording or fixing rewrites files on disk. Follow this sequence; do not skip steps.

  1. Replay pass (no record/fix flags): Run uv run pytest on the target path; all green (or failures are understood and unrelated to the artifact you will refresh).
  2. Scope locked: Identify the cassette under tests/cassettes/ or the snapshot(...) assertion to update; confirm only those files should change.
  3. Record or fix: Run one scoped command: uv run pytest --record-mode=rewrite … or uv run pytest --inline-snapshot=fix … for that path only.
  4. Post-condition: Run the same tests again without record/fix flags; all green. Inspect git diff — only expected .yaml / snapshot changes.

If step 4 fails, revert unintended diffs and fix the test or model before re-recording.

Testing Tools

from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext
from pydantic_ai.models.test import TestModel

def test_tool_is_called():
    agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')
    tool_called = False

    @agent.tool_plain
    def my_tool(x: int) -> str:
        nonlocal tool_called
        tool_called = True
        return f"Result: {x}"

    # Force TestModel to call the tool
    result = agent.run_sync(
        'Use my_tool',
        model=TestModel(call_tools=['my_tool'])
    )

    assert tool_called

Testing with Dependencies

from dataclasses import dataclass
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock

@dataclass
class Deps:
    api: ApiClient

def test_tool_with_deps():
    # Create mock dependency
    mock_api = AsyncMock()
    mock_api.fetch.return_value = {'data': 'test'}

    agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', deps_type=Deps)

    @agent.tool
    async def fetch_data(ctx: RunContext[Deps]) -> dict:
        return await ctx.deps.api.fetch()

    with agent.override(
        model=TestModel(call_tools=['fetch_data']),
        deps=Deps(api=mock_api)
    ):
        result = agent.run_sync('Fetch data')

    mock_api.fetch.assert_called_once()

Capture Messages

Inspect all messages in a run:

from pydantic_ai import Agent, capture_run_messages

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')

with capture_run_messages() as messages:
    result = agent.run_sync('Hello', model=TestModel())

# Inspect captured messages
for msg in messages:
    print(msg)

Testing Patterns Summary

ScenarioApproach
Unit tests without APITestModel()
Custom model logicFunctionModel(func)
Recorded real responses@pytest.mark.vcr
Assert output structureinline_snapshot
Test tools are calledTestModel(call_tools=[...])
Mock dependenciesagent.override(deps=...)

pytest Configuration

Typical pyproject.toml:

[tool.pytest.ini_options]
testpaths = ["tests"]
asyncio_mode = "auto"  # For async tests

Run tests:

uv run pytest tests/test_agent.py -v
uv run pytest --inline-snapshot=fix  # Update snapshots

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

existential-birds のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する