本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

widgetkit-code-review

Reviews WidgetKit code for timeline management, view composition, configurable intents, and performance. Use when reviewing code with import WidgetKit, TimelineProvider, Widget protocol, or @main struct Widget.

existential-birds/beagle
インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル（5）

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB
  • references/intents.md4.1 KB
  • references/performance.md4.5 KB
  • references/timeline.md4.2 KB
  • references/views.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md（原文）

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

WidgetKit Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
TimelineProvider, entries, reload policiesreferences/timeline.md
Widget families, containerBackground, deep linkingreferences/views.md
AppIntentConfiguration, EntityQuery, @Parameterreferences/intents.md
Refresh budget, memory limits, cachingreferences/performance.md

Review Checklist

  • placeholder(in:) returns immediately without async work
  • Timeline entries spaced at least 5 minutes apart
  • getSnapshot checks context.isPreview for gallery previews
  • containerBackground(for:) used for iOS 17+ compatibility
  • widgetURL used for systemSmall (not Link)
  • No Button views (use Link or widgetURL)
  • No AsyncImage or UIViewRepresentable in widget views
  • Images downsampled to widget display size (~30MB limit)
  • App Groups configured for data sharing between app and widget
  • EntityQuery implements defaultResult() for non-optional parameters
  • New intent parameters handle nil for existing widgets after updates
  • reloadTimelines called strategically (not on every data change)

When to Load References

  • TimelineProvider implementation or refresh issues -> timeline.md
  • Widget sizes, Lock Screen, containerBackground -> views.md
  • Configurable widgets, AppIntent migration -> intents.md
  • Memory issues, caching, budget management -> performance.md

Review Questions

  1. Does the widget provide fallback entries for when system delays refresh?
  2. Are Lock Screen families (accessoryCircular/Rectangular/Inline) handled appropriately?
  3. Would migrating from IntentConfiguration break existing user widgets?
  4. Is timeline populated with future entries or does it rely on frequent refreshes?
  5. Is data cached via App Groups for widget access?

Hard gates (before reporting)

Complete in order for each finding you intend to report. Do not advance until the pass condition is satisfied.

  1. Location artifact — The finding includes [FILE:LINE] (or a line range) copied from the current file contents; the path resolves in this repo.
  2. Scope read — You read the full surrounding implementation: the TimelineProvider (including placeholder, getSnapshot, and getTimeline when relevant), the @main Widget / widget bundle, or the configurable widget’s AppIntentConfiguration / intent types—not only a diff hunk or snippet.
  3. Platform or system claim (only if the finding depends on refresh budget, ~30MB memory guidance, Lock Screen accessory families, iOS 17+ containerBackground, App Groups data sharing, or migration from IntentConfiguration to AppIntentConfiguration) — You name one concrete artifact you inspected (for example .entitlements / App Group id in project, WidgetFamily handling in source, IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET, or the exact reference subsection you used) or you drop or downgrade the finding to an open question.
  4. Protocol — Pre-report steps in review-verification-protocol are satisfied for this item (no finding if they are not).

Use the issue format [FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE for each reported finding. Hard gate 4 is the full pre-report checklist for this skill’s review type.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

ログインしてレビューを書く

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

adr-decision-extraction

無料

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

adr-writing

無料

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

agent-architecture-analysis

無料

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

ai-elements

無料

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

app-intents-code-review

無料

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

artifact-analysis

無料

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

existential-birds のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する