本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

learn-alternatives

Compare different approaches to solve the same problem

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Show alternatives

Compare different approaches to solve the same problem.

Usage

/learn:alternatives              # Compare approaches for current code
/learn:alternatives auth         # Compare authentication methods
/learn:alternatives state        # Compare state management options
/learn:alternatives --detailed   # Include code examples for each

Instructions

  1. Identify the problem being solved (from context or argument)
  2. Present 3-5 alternative approaches
  3. For each approach, explain:
    • What it is (one sentence)
    • When to use it
    • Trade-offs (pros/cons)
  4. Provide a recommendation based on context
  5. Optionally show code examples for top choices

Response format

## Problem: [What we're trying to solve]

### Approach 1: [Name]

**What**: [One-sentence description]

**When to use**:
- [Scenario 1]
- [Scenario 2]

**Pros**: [List]
**Cons**: [List]

---

### Approach 2: [Name]
...

---

## Comparison Table

| Criteria | Approach 1 | Approach 2 | Approach 3 |
|----------|------------|------------|------------|
| Complexity | Low | Medium | High |
| Performance | ★★☆ | ★★★ | ★★☆ |
| Bundle size | Small | Medium | Large |
| Learning curve | Easy | Medium | Steep |

## Recommendation

**For your case**: [Recommended approach] because [reason based on context]

**Consider instead if**: [Alternative scenarios]

Comparison criteria

Standard criteria to evaluate (adjust based on problem):

CriteriaDescription
ComplexityHow hard to implement and maintain
PerformanceRuntime speed, memory usage
Bundle sizeImpact on frontend bundle
Learning curveTime to understand and use correctly
FlexibilityEase of extending or modifying
CommunityDocumentation, ecosystem, support
TestingHow easy to test
Type safetyTypeScript support quality

Depth modes

Default

  • 3-4 alternatives
  • Brief description each
  • Comparison table
  • Recommendation

--detailed

  • 4-5 alternatives
  • Code example for each
  • Detailed trade-offs
  • Migration considerations
  • Real-world case studies

--quick

  • 2-3 alternatives
  • One-line each
  • Quick recommendation

Example session

User: I'm using useState for form state. /learn:alternatives

Claude: ## Problem: Managing Form State in React

### Approach 1: Multiple useState

**What**: Separate useState for each field

**When to use**:
- Simple forms (< 5 fields)
- No complex validation
- No cross-field dependencies

**Pros**: Simple, no dependencies, easy to understand
**Cons**: Verbose with many fields, scattered state

---

### Approach 2: Single useState with Object

**What**: One useState holding all fields as object

**When to use**:
- Medium forms (5-10 fields)
- Need to reset entire form
- Want cleaner code

**Pros**: Grouped state, easy reset, cleaner
**Cons**: Need spread operator, can cause unnecessary re-renders

---

### Approach 3: useReducer

**What**: Reducer pattern for complex state transitions

**When to use**:
- Complex validation logic
- Multi-step forms
- Undo/redo functionality

**Pros**: Predictable updates, handles complex logic, testable
**Cons**: More boilerplate, learning curve

---

### Approach 4: Form Library (React Hook Form, Formik)

**What**: Dedicated form state management library

**When to use**:
- Large forms (10+ fields)
- Complex validation (async, cross-field)
- Performance critical (many fields)

**Pros**: Optimized re-renders, validation built-in, less code
**Cons**: Dependency, learning curve, bundle size

---

## Comparison Table

| Criteria | useState | useReducer | React Hook Form |
|----------|----------|------------|-----------------|
| Complexity | Low | Medium | Medium |
| Performance | ★★☆ | ★★☆ | ★★★ |
| Bundle size | 0kb | 0kb | ~8kb |
| Validation | Manual | Manual | Built-in |
| Best for | Simple | Complex logic | Large forms |

## Recommendation

**For your case**: If this is a simple login/contact form, stick with **useState**. If you're building a multi-step checkout or admin form, consider **React Hook Form** for the validation and performance benefits.

**Consider useReducer if**: You need undo/redo, complex state machines, or want reducer-style testing.

Common alternative comparisons

TopicTypical Alternatives
StateuseState, useReducer, Zustand, Redux, Jotai
StylingCSS Modules, Tailwind, styled-components, CSS-in-JS
Data fetchingfetch, axios, React Query, SWR
FormsuseState, React Hook Form, Formik
AuthJWT, sessions, OAuth, magic links
API designREST, GraphQL, tRPC, gRPC
TestingJest, Vitest, Testing Library, Cypress
DatabasesPostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, SQLite

$ARGUMENTS

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audit Claude Code agents, skills, and commands for quality and production readiness. Use when evaluating skill quality, checking production readiness scores, or comparing agents against best-practice templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1432026年10月7日 更新

Codebase health audit scoring 7 categories with progression plan

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1432026年10月7日 更新

Autonomous improvement loop: scan codebase metrics, scaffold experiment files, run agent-driven iterations until metric improves

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1432026年10月7日 更新

best-of-n

無料

Generate bounded independent candidates, score them against a frozen rubric, and verify the selected result with a proof log.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1432026年10月7日 更新

canary

無料

Post-deploy monitoring: watch production after a deploy and alert on regressions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1432026年10月7日 更新

catchup

無料

Restore context after /clear by summarizing recent work and project state

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1432026年10月7日 更新

FlorianBruniaux のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する