本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

talk-stage1-extract

Extracts and structures source material (articles, transcripts, notes) into a talk summary with narrative arc, themes, metrics, and gaps. Auto-detects REX vs Concept type. Use when starting a new talk from any source material or auditing existing material before committing to a talk.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Talk stage 1: Extract

Transforms raw material (article, transcript, notes, or a mix) into a structured summary ready for the pipeline's downstream stages. Auto-detects source type.

When to use this skill

  • Starting a new talk from any source material
  • First step of the talk pipeline (always run before other stages)
  • Auditing existing source material before committing to a talk

What this skill does

  1. Collects metadata by asking for slug, event, date, duration, audience, mode if not provided
  2. Reads the source and loads the source file or inline content
  3. Detects source type (REX with real-world proof vs Concept with ideas/thesis) based on content signals
  4. Extracts the narrative arc (chronological for REX, thematic for Concept)
  5. Extracts metrics with every measurable number and its source
  6. Identifies main themes (3-7 themes)
  7. Flags gaps: what's missing for a complete talk
  8. Writes {slug}-summary.md

Input

Required:

  • Source file path or inline content (article .mdx, transcript .md, notes)
  • Metadata: slug, event, date, duration, audience, type (--rex or --concept)

If metadata is missing -> AskUserQuestion before proceeding.

Output

talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-summary.md

Source type detection

REX signalsConcept signals
Specific datesTheses, arguments
Measured metricsGeneral observations
Project/tool namesTrend observations
Commits, releases, PRsAnalogies, metaphors
"I shipped", "We built""I think", "In my opinion"

If hybrid -> note both components in the summary.

Output format

# Talk Summary: {Provisional Title}

**Slug** : {slug}
**Event** : {event}
**Date** : {date}
**Duration** : {duration} min
**Audience** : {audience description}
**Type detected** : REX | Concept | Hybrid
**Source** : {source file path}

---

## Narrative Arc

{Arc description: 3-5 sentences. Chronological if REX, thematic if Concept.}

## Main Themes

| # | Theme | Short description | Weight |
|---|-------|------------------|--------|
| 1 | {theme} | {description} | High/Medium/Low |
...

## Key Metrics Extracted

{All measurable numbers found in the source}

Format: `{value}`: {context} (Source: {section/page/git})

Examples:
- `1,200 commits` over 7 months (Source: "acceleration" section)
- `-97% traffic` after SSE migration (Source: CHANGELOG v1.1.0)

If none -> "No verifiable metrics found (Concept mode)"

## Narrative Potential

{3-5 sentences on the strengths and possible narrative angles.
What makes this talk potentially strong. What might be missing.}

## Gaps Identified

- [ ] {gap 1}: {how to fill it}
- [ ] {gap 2}: {how to fill it}

If no obvious gaps -> "No major gaps identified."

## Recommendations for next stages

- **Research**: {recommended / not applicable (Concept mode)}: {why}
- **Concepts**: {priority themes to explore}
- **Position**: {angles already visible from the source material}

---

*Generated by talk-stage1-extract: {date}*
*Source: {source path}*

Metric extraction rules

  • Do not round without indicating it
  • Always include the metric's source
  • If two sources contradict, flag both without picking one
  • No invented metrics to fill gaps
  • Use {before} -> {after} format for evolutions

Anti-patterns

  • Vague summary ("This text is about AI...")
  • Omitting metrics, even approximate ones with their source
  • Hiding gaps (naming them is better than pretending they don't exist)
  • Changing the detected type without justification
  • Inventing a narrative arc not present in the source

Validation checklist

  • Source type detected and justified
  • Narrative arc in 3-5 clear sentences
  • All measurable metrics extracted with their source
  • Main themes listed (3-7 max)
  • Gaps explicitly identified
  • File saved to talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-summary.md

Tips

  • Run this before the orchestrator if you want to verify the source material is usable
  • The summary is the foundation: every downstream stage reads it
  • Hybrid sources (part REX, part Concept) are fine, name both components clearly

Related

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audit Claude Code agents, skills, and commands for quality and production readiness. Use when evaluating skill quality, checking production readiness scores, or comparing agents against best-practice templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1452026年10月11日 更新

Codebase health audit scoring 7 categories with progression plan

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1452026年10月11日 更新

Autonomous improvement loop: scan codebase metrics, scaffold experiment files, run agent-driven iterations until metric improves

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1452026年10月11日 更新

best-of-n

無料

Generate bounded independent candidates, score them against a frozen rubric, and verify the selected result with a proof log.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1452026年10月11日 更新

canary

無料

Post-deploy monitoring: watch production after a deploy and alert on regressions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1452026年10月11日 更新

catchup

無料

Restore context after /clear by summarizing recent work and project state

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide6,1452026年10月11日 更新

FlorianBruniaux のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する