無料GitHub で公開

brd

Draft a Business Requirements Document (BRD) for cross-functional or stakeholder-heavy work that needs more structure than an intake. Use after `/intake` when the request spans multiple systems/teams, carries regulatory weight, or needs formal sign-off. Output lives at `docs/brd/<slug>.md`.

friedbotstudio/baseline

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル（2）

SKILL.md3.0 KB
template.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md（原文）

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

BRD — Business Requirements Document

You are drafting a BRD. BRDs are heavier than intakes — they exist when a request needs explicit sign-off from named business stakeholders, and when the why and the what must survive independently of the how (the spec).

Use a BRD when:

Multiple teams or external stakeholders need to align.
Regulatory, legal, or compliance concerns shape the requirements.
Business milestones or contractual dates are tied to the work.
Budget or headcount implications warrant an approved scope.

Don't use a BRD for: single-team feature work, quickfixes, or internal refactors. Those need an intake + spec, nothing more.

Prerequisite

Either /intake has completed (there's a corresponding docs/intake/<slug>.md), OR the user is starting directly at BRD because the intake exists upstream (e.g., in Linear/Jira) and they want to formalize it here.

Inputs

The intake document (if any) — it supplies Problem and Goal.
The user's additional context about stakeholders, timelines, and compliance.
template.md in this skill directory.

Steps

If a corresponding intake exists at docs/intake/<slug>.md, read it. Map Problem → Business objective and Goal → Executive summary.
Read template.md. Every heading must appear in the output.
For each section, write content that answers the questions in the template comments. If unknown, list the gap under Open questions — never fabricate stakeholder names, dates, or dollar amounts.
Name every requirement with an ID: BR-001, BR-002, … for business reqs; FR-001, … for functional; NFR-001, … for non-functional. Downstream spec AC will reference these IDs.
Write to docs/brd/<slug>.md (same slug as the intake, if one exists).
Tell the user: "BRD drafted at docs/brd/<slug>.md. Sign-offs required from: <list>. Open questions: N. Next: /scout (or get sign-offs first if you want to freeze scope)."

Drafting rules

Requirements are testable, not aspirational. "The system shall support peak traffic" is aspirational. "The system shall sustain 500 RPS with P95 < 200ms" is testable.
Separate business from functional from non-functional. A mixed list becomes unactionable.
Risks must have owners. "Risk: the vendor API could change" with no owner is noise. Either name who monitors it or delete it.
Sign-offs are names, not titles. "Head of Compliance" can't sign — their replacement, who is a specific person, can.
Do not write the solution. The BRD says what must be true; the spec says how. If you catch yourself writing "we'll use Kafka", stop — that belongs in /spec.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

ログインしてレビューを書く

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

audit-baseline

無料

Drift check between the baseline implementation on disk and the claims in `docs/init/seed.md` + cross-references in CLAUDE.md, README.md, and the rendered docs site. Verifies hook/agent/skill/command names + counts, settings.json wiring, project.json key presence, .mcp.json servers, vendored license files, and helper script presence. Exit 0 PASS / 1 FAIL — suitable for CI. Read-only; safe to invoke any time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。