本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

testing

Skill validation framework PLUS daily test-suite health and regression intelligence. Validates skill conformance (frontmatter, manifest coverage, resolver coverage). Runs the project test suite in tiered phases (unit / evals / integration / system health), classifies failures, and produces a regression-aware report.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Testing Skill — Validation + Daily Health & Regression Intelligence

Convention: see conventions/quality.md for the test-before-bulk pattern; this skill enforces it across the project's own test suite.

Two modes

This skill has two related but distinct modes:

  1. Skill conformance validation — gbrain's own conformance bar (the original 1.0 scope). Validates every skill has SKILL.md with frontmatter, every reference exists, manifest + resolver coverage round-trips.

  2. Project test-suite health (v0.25.1 extension) — runs the project's tiered test suite and produces a regression-classified report. Used by daily cron, container-restart bootstrap, and "how are the tests" prompts.

Pick the mode by trigger.

Mode 1: Skill conformance validation

Contract

This mode guarantees:

  • Every skill directory has a SKILL.md file
  • Every SKILL.md has valid YAML frontmatter (name, description)
  • Every SKILL.md has required sections per test/skills-conformance.test.ts
  • skills/manifest.json lists every skill directory
  • skills/RESOLVER.md references every skill in the manifest
  • openclaw.plugin.json skills[] round-trips with both
  • openclaw.plugin.json keeps OpenClaw install-required native plugin fields (id, object configSchema, and contracts.contextEngines when applicable)
  • No MECE violations (duplicate triggers across skills)

Phases

  1. Walk skills directory. List all subdirs containing SKILL.md.
  2. Validate frontmatter. Parse YAML, check required fields.
  3. Validate sections. Check for the required headings.
  4. Check manifest. Every skill dir must be in manifest.json.
  5. Check resolver. Every manifest skill must have a RESOLVER row.
  6. Check round-trip. RESOLVER trigger ↔ frontmatter triggers.
  7. Report results.

Automation

bun test test/skills-conformance.test.ts test/resolver.test.ts test/openclaw-plugin-manifest.test.ts

The CI-gated check is the package.json test script.

Output format

Skill Validation Report
========================
Skills found:        N
Conformance:         N/N pass
Manifest coverage:   N/N
Resolver coverage:   N/N
Round-trip:          N/N
MECE violations:     N

Issues:
- <skill>: <issue>

Mode 2: Project test-suite health (v0.25.1)

When to use

  • Daily test cron fires
  • User asks "run the tests" / "how are the tests" / "what's broken"
  • After significant code changes (often via cross-modal-review)
  • After container restart (bootstrap)
  • When something seems off and you want to verify system health

Test tiers

TierWhat it runsWall timeGates
Unitbun test (deterministic, zero external calls)<2sEvery commit
EvalsLLM-judge or quality evals~60sDaily
IntegrationE2E tests against real Postgres~5mPre-ship + nightly
System healthDisk / memory / CPU / service liveness<10sDaily

Daily run protocol

When the cron fires (or the user asks), do ALL of this:

1. Run unit tests

bun test 2>&1

Parse: total passed, total failed, total skipped, file-level results.

2. Run evals (if the project has an evals config)

# Adapt to the project's eval config
bun test --filter eval 2>&1

Parse: same format. Note any flakes (tests that fail due to API timeouts, not code bugs).

3. Run system health checks

  • Disk / memory / CPU
  • gbrain: gbrain doctor --fast --json
  • Database connection (if applicable)
  • Critical files exist (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.)

4. Git diff analysis (CRITICAL — regression intelligence)

# What changed since last test run?
git log --oneline --since="24 hours ago"

For each failing test:

  1. Check if the test itself was modified recently (test change, not regression).
  2. Check if the code it tests was modified recently (possible regression).
  3. Check if it's a known flake (API timeout, service down).
  4. Check if a dependency was updated (gbrain, bun, etc.).

5. Classify each failure

ClassificationMarkerAction
REGRESSION — code changed, test broke🔴Flag with the commit that broke it
STALE — test expects old behavior; code is correct🟡Fix the test, not the code
FLAKE — API timeout, service down, LLM variance⚠️Note, don't alarm; retry once
NEW — test was just added and isn't passing yet🟢Check if intentional
INFRA — container restart wiped state🛠Run bootstrap, retest

6. Report format

🧪 Daily Tests — YYYY-MM-DD

Unit:   X/Y passed (Z skipped)
Evals:  X/Y passed
System: [health summary]

REGRESSIONS:
  🔴 <test-name>: broke by commit <sha> "<commit message>"

STALE TESTS:
  🟡 <test-name>: expects X but code now does Y (commit <sha>)

FLAKES:
  ⚠️ <test-name>: timeout (retry passed)

✅ ALL CLEAR  (when applicable)

7. Auto-fix protocol

DO auto-fix:

  • Test expects an old file path after a rename → update the test
  • Test expects an old version string → update
  • Test expects a file that was intentionally deleted → remove the test
  • Import path broke because file moved → fix the import

DO NOT auto-fix:

  • Test expects behavior A but code now does B → ASK first. Maybe the test is right and the code has a bug.
  • Security test failing → ALWAYS escalate, never auto-fix.
  • Test was skipped with a TODO → don't un-skip without understanding why.

When uncertain: check the commit message that changed the code, check if there's a related PR or conversation, ask the user if still unclear.

State (regression history)

Track results in ~/.gbrain/test-state.json for trend tracking:

{
  "lastRun": "2026-04-16T13:37:00Z",
  "unit": { "passed": 1262, "failed": 31, "skipped": 8 },
  "evals": { "passed": 17, "failed": 0 },
  "system": { "doctor": "ok", "gbrain": "0.25.1" },
  "failureHistory": [
    { "test": "<name>", "since": "2026-04-14", "classification": "stale" }
  ]
}

This enables:

  • Trend tracking (are we getting better or worse?)
  • Flake detection (same test fails intermittently)
  • Regression velocity (how fast do we break things after changes?)

When it fails

Follow the agent operator protocol for any gbrain error code, exit code, [AGENT] block or notice block. Specific to this skill:

  • A test fails because of a missing API key or a flaky provider: classify it as an environment failure, not a code failure, and say which key.
  • A security test fails: always escalate to the user; never auto-fix it.
  • gbrain doctor cannot reach the brain (GBRAIN_DB_ACCESS): route to the db-repair skill before running integration tests.

Anti-Patterns

  • ❌ Skipping conformance validation after adding a new skill
  • ❌ Adding skills to manifest.json without adding to RESOLVER.md
  • ❌ Treating every red test as a regression. Classify first; many are stale or flaky.
  • ❌ Auto-un-skipping a test without understanding why it was skipped
  • ❌ Auto-"fixing" a security test failure
  • ❌ Reporting "all clear" without actually running system health checks

Contract

This skill guarantees:

  • Routing matches the canonical triggers in the frontmatter.
  • Output written under the directories listed in writes_to: (when applicable).
  • Conventions referenced (quality.md, brain-first.md, _brain-filing-rules.md) are followed.
  • Privacy contract preserved: no real names, no fork-specific filesystem path literals, no upstream-fork references.

The full behavior contract is documented in the body sections above; this section exists for the conformance test.

Output Format

The skill's output shape is documented inline in the body sections above (see "Output", "Brain page format", or equivalent). The literal section header here exists for the conformance test (test/skills-conformance.test.ts).

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Verify a research claim or academic citation by tracing it through publication → methodology → raw data → independent replication. Routes through perplexity-research for the actual web lookup, then formats results as a citation-checked brain page. Use when a book/article/conversation cites a study and you want to confirm the claim is real, replicated, and accurately characterized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

garrytan/gbrain3.1万2026年10月11日 更新

Universal archivist for personal file archives (Dropbox/B2/Gmail-takeout/local-mount/hard-drive-dump). Filters for high-value content (the user's own writing, ideas, relationships) and surfaces it interactively. REFUSES TO RUN without an explicit gbrain.yml `archive-crawler.scan_paths:` allow-list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

garrytan/gbrain3.1万2026年10月11日 更新

Transform raw article text dumps in the brain into structured pages with executive summary, verbatim quotes, key insights, why-it-matters, and cross-references. Replaces walls-of-text with quotable, actionable brain pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

garrytan/gbrain3.1万2026年10月11日 更新

ask-user

無料

Reusable pattern for presenting the user with explicit choices and gating execution until they respond. Used by other skills when a decision point requires human input before proceeding. Platform-agnostic — works on Telegram (inline buttons), Discord, CLI, or any agent with a message tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

garrytan/gbrain3.1万2026年10月11日 更新

Feed and whole-publication ingestion: turn an entire blog, newsletter, or RSS/Atom archive into brain source pages. Covers feed discovery, pagination walking, normalization to a common article shape, canonical-URL dedup, idempotent re-runs, 429 pacing, and empty-husk repair. This is the PUBLICATION-scope skill — a single article URL routes to idea-ingest instead. Per-article enrichment hands off to the brain-ingest-gate skill; public posts only (gated content is skipped, never worked around).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

garrytan/gbrain3.1万2026年10月11日 更新

Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's life, NOT a therapist assigning homework. The reader decides what to do about it. Layout is a top-aligned HTML table or stacked sections, never a bare markdown pipe table (pipe tables center-misalign uneven columns). Output is a single brain page at media/books/<slug>-personalized.md plus an optional PDF via brain-pdf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

garrytan/gbrain3.1万2026年10月11日 更新

garrytan のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する