本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

secret-serialization

Finds secrets, tokens, passwords, and API keys that can leak through generated serialization: Python dataclass repr and asdict, attrs, pydantic model_dump, NamedTuple, JavaScript JSON.stringify and util.inspect, structured logs, tracing spans, and error reports. Use when asked to "check for secret serialization", "credential in repr", "repr=False audit", "secret in spans", "token in logs", or when a change adds a credential field to a dataclass, model, or config object, or adds code that stringifies whole objects or every kwarg into telemetry.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md10.2 KB
  • references/javascript-typescript.md5.1 KB
  • references/python.md9.9 KB
  • SOURCES.md6.8 KB
  • SPEC.md5.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Secret Serialization Review

Find credentials that can leak because a type serializes itself and something upstream serializes whole objects.

A leak usually needs two changes that each look safe alone:

  1. Holder: a credential is stored as a field on a type with generated repr, str, asdict, model_dump, toJSON, or property enumeration.
  2. Sink: logging, tracing, error reporting, caching, or a response serializes whole objects or every kwarg (str(value), span.set_data(key, obj), logger.info("%s", obj), JSON.stringify(args)).

The two sides are often written months apart by different authors. Report either side on its own. Always search the existing tree for the other side, because it is frequently already on the default branch and absent from the diff.

Boundary

  • This skill covers indirect leaks through generated serialization and wholesale sinks.
  • Direct leaks, such as interpolating a token into a log message, belong to security-review. Report them here only when they come from a changed wholesale sink.
  • Hardcoded secret literals and committed .env files are out of scope.

References

ReferenceRead When
references/python.mdReviewing Python dataclasses, attrs, pydantic, NamedTuple, msgspec, logging, Sentry SDK, or OpenTelemetry code
references/javascript-typescript.mdReviewing JavaScript or TypeScript classes, config objects, JSON.stringify, util.inspect, pino or winston, or Sentry and OpenTelemetry spans

Credential Fields

Treat a field as credential-bearing when its name, type, or source says so:

  • Names containing secret, token, password, passwd, pwd, api_key, apikey, access_key, private_key, signing_key, client_secret, bearer, credential, authorization, auth_header, cookie, session_key, dsn, connection_string, webhook_secret, hmac, or refresh_token.
  • Types such as SecretStr, SecretBytes, or wrappers around them.
  • Values assigned from environment variables, a secrets manager, or a constructor argument named like the above.

Explicit Exclusion

Separate two kinds of path:

  • Generated paths are produced by the type itself: __repr__ and __str__, asdict, model_dump, toJSON, and own-enumerable-property walks (JSON.stringify, util.inspect, spread). They are the holder's responsibility.
  • Raw attribute access reads the stored value directly: vars(obj), obj.__dict__, pickle, json.dumps(obj, default=vars). Every stored attribute is exposed this way, whatever flags the field has. Treat these only as sinks: report them when a sink in the repository applies one to a credential-bearing instance.

A field is fully excluded when every generated path its type has is blocked, whether by one mechanism or several together. A field is partially excluded when at least one generated path still includes it. No field-level mechanism defeats raw attribute access. Only not storing the value does, so fix raw attribute findings at the sink.

MechanismBlocksStill includes the field
dataclasses.field(repr=False), attrs.field(repr=False)__repr__, __str__asdict, astuple, raw access
Pydantic Field(repr=False)__repr__, __str__model_dump, model_dump_json, response serialization, raw access
Pydantic Field(exclude=True)model_dump, model_dump_json, response serialization__repr__, __str__, raw access
Pydantic Field(repr=False, exclude=True)Every generated pathRaw access
JavaScript #private fieldEvery generated pathNothing outside the class body
Object.defineProperty(..., { enumerable: false })Every generated pathExplicit property reads, Object.getOwnPropertyNames
Hand-written __repr__, __str__, toJSON, or [util.inspect.custom] that omits the fieldOnly the path it overrides (a __repr__ also serves str() when there is no __str__)Every other generated path, raw access
Redacting wrapper: SecretStr, SecretBytes, a project Redacted[T]Every generated pathpickle and recursive __dict__ walks such as default=vars, which reach the value stored inside the wrapper
Not stored on the object: read inside the method, or held in a closureEverythingNothing

Do not treat underscore naming, TypeScript private, __slots__, type annotations, comments, dataclass(init=False), or a custom __init__ that still assigns the field as blocking any path.

Investigation Process

  1. Read the changed hunk. Find new or modified credential fields on auto-serializing types, and new or modified code that serializes objects or kwargs into logs, spans, error context, caches, queues, or responses.
  2. For each credential field, read the full class, decorators, base classes, and model config. List every generated path and check which ones the field's mechanisms block, using the table above.
  3. Grep for where instances are constructed and passed. Instances handed to decorators, **kwargs, tool call arguments, task payloads, or middleware reach generic sinks.
  4. Grep the whole repository for sinks that can see those instances, not only the diff. Useful patterns: str(value), repr(, asdict(, model_dump(, set_data(, set_attribute(, set_context(, set_extra(, JSON.stringify(, util.inspect(, loggers called with objects, and raw attribute access (vars(, __dict__, pickle.dumps(, default=vars).
  5. For each changed sink, check for a key allowlist, redaction keyed on credential names, or a filter that replaces objects with their type name. Then grep for callers that pass credential-bearing objects into it.
  6. Look at tests only to see whether one asserts the credential is absent from the serialized form. A missing test is fix guidance, not a finding.
  7. Confirm the code ships. Skip fixtures, examples, generated code, and test-only helpers.

What To Report

CategoryReport When
Unexcluded credential fieldA credential field is added or moved onto a type with generated serialization, and no mechanism blocks any of its generated paths.
Partial exclusionAt least one generated path still includes the field, and a sink in the repository uses that path on instances of the type.
Raw attribute sinkA sink applies vars, __dict__, pickle, or default=vars to an instance that stores a credential, even if the field is fully excluded or wrapped.
Credential moved onto a holderA refactor moves a credential from a lazy read or closure onto an object field.
Wholesale serialization sinkNew or changed telemetry, logging, error-context, cache, or response code serializes every kwarg, every attribute, or whole objects without an allowlist or redaction.
Sink loses its filterA change removes or weakens redaction, an allowlist, or object-to-type-name replacement in an existing sink.
Object passed to telemetryA client, config, or settings object is passed to a span, log, or error-context call that stringifies it.

Severity

LevelUse For
highThe credential reaches a sink anywhere in the repository: log line, span attribute, error event, cache entry, persisted row, queue payload, or API response. The other side may predate the diff. Also a new wholesale sink whose existing callers pass credential-bearing objects.
mediumAn unexcluded credential field whose instances leave the constructing module, after a repository search found no sink. Also a wholesale sink with no allowlist and no traced credential-bearing caller.
lowAn unexcluded credential field whose instances never leave the constructing scope.
  • Do not downgrade because the sink or the holder is outside the diff. That is the normal shape of this bug.
  • Choose the lower severity when reachability depends on unproven preconditions.

What Not To Report

  • Fully excluded fields, unless a raw attribute sink receives the instance.
  • Partial exclusions when no sink in the repository uses the unblocked path.
  • Credentials read inside a method and never stored on the instance.
  • Placeholder or fake values in tests, fixtures, or examples.
  • Types with no generated serialization and no __dict__ or enumeration sink.
  • Sinks that already allowlist scalar keys, redact by credential name, or replace objects with a type name.
  • Pre-existing fields and sinks the diff does not touch, unless the diff connects them.
  • Style, naming, or missing-test-only observations.

Fix Guidance

Include one concrete fix per finding:

  • Holder: block every generated path, wrap the value in a redacting type, or stop storing it on the object.
  • Raw attribute sink: serialize an explicit allowlisted dict instead of the instance, or stop storing the credential on it. A field flag or wrapper does not fix it.
  • Sink: allowlist scalar keys, redact keys matching credential names, and record type(value).__name__ instead of str(value) for non-scalar values.
  • Regression test: serialize an instance with the same serializer the sink uses (for example sentry_sdk.serializer.serialize, json.dumps(asdict(obj)), JSON.stringify(obj), util.inspect(obj)) and assert the credential string is absent.

Finding Format

  • Title: name the field or sink and the leak path, for example "_shared_secret included in RpcClient dataclass repr".
  • Description: one or two sentences naming the generated path that exposes the credential, where instances travel, and the fix.
  • Evidence: 2 to 5 bullets naming the class, decorator, generated paths checked, the exclusion looked for, and every sink or caller traced, including those outside the diff.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

agents-md

無料

Creates and maintains concise AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md project instruction files. Use when asked to create AGENTS.md, update AGENTS.md, maintain agent docs, set up CLAUDE.md, document repository agent conventions, or keep coding-agent instructions minimal and reference-backed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

getsentry/skills1,0452026年10月9日 更新

Write, review, and improve blog posts for the Sentry engineering blog following Sentry's specific writing standards, voice, and quality bar. Use this skill whenever someone asks to write a blog post, draft a technical article, review blog content, improve a draft, write a product announcement, create an engineering deep-dive, or produce any written content destined for the Sentry blog or developer audience. Also trigger when the user mentions "blog post," "blog draft," "write-up," "announcement post," "engineering post," "deep dive," "postmortem," or asks for help with technical writing for Sentry. Even if the user just says "help me write about [feature/topic]" — if it sounds like it could become a Sentry blog post, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

getsentry/skills1,0452026年10月9日 更新

Write copy following Sentry brand guidelines. Use when writing UI text, error messages, empty states, onboarding flows, 404 pages, documentation, marketing copy, or any user-facing content. Covers both Plain Speech (default) and Sentry Voice tones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

getsentry/skills1,0452026年10月9日 更新

Analyze a repository to generate recommended Claude Code settings.json permissions. Use when setting up a new project, auditing existing settings, or determining which read-only bash commands to allow. Detects tech stack, build tools, and monorepo structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

getsentry/skills1,0452026年10月9日 更新

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

getsentry/skills1,0452026年10月9日 更新

Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Use when asked to "simplify code", "clean up code", "refactor for clarity", "improve readability", or review recently modified code for elegance. Focuses on project-specific best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

getsentry/skills1,0452026年10月9日 更新

getsentry のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する