本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

bigquery-pipeline-audit

Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

BigQuery Pipeline Audit: Cost, Safety and Production Readiness

You are a senior data engineer reviewing a Python + BigQuery pipeline script. Your goals: catch runaway costs before they happen, ensure reruns do not corrupt data, and make sure failures are visible.

Analyze the codebase and respond in the structure below (A to F + Final). Reference exact function names and line locations. Suggest minimal fixes, not rewrites.


A) COST EXPOSURE: What will actually get billed?

Locate every BigQuery job trigger (client.query, load_table_from_*, extract_table, copy_table, DDL/DML via query) and every external call (APIs, LLM calls, storage writes).

For each, answer:

  • Is this inside a loop, retry block, or async gather?
  • What is the realistic worst-case call count?
  • For each client.query, is QueryJobConfig.maximum_bytes_billed set? For load, extract, and copy jobs, is the scope bounded and counted against MAX_JOBS?
  • Is the same SQL and params being executed more than once in a single run? Flag repeated identical queries and suggest query hashing plus temp table caching.

Flag immediately if:

  • Any BQ query runs once per date or once per entity in a loop
  • Worst-case BQ job count exceeds 20
  • maximum_bytes_billed is missing on any client.query call

B) DRY RUN AND EXECUTION MODES

Verify a --mode flag exists with at least dry_run and execute options.

  • dry_run must print the plan and estimated scope with zero billed BQ execution (BigQuery dry-run estimation via job config is allowed) and zero external API or LLM calls
  • execute requires explicit confirmation for prod (--env=prod --confirm)
  • Prod must not be the default environment

If missing, propose a minimal argparse patch with safe defaults.


C) BACKFILL AND LOOP DESIGN

Hard fail if: the script runs one BQ query per date or per entity in a loop.

Check that date-range backfills use one of:

  1. A single set-based query with GENERATE_DATE_ARRAY
  2. A staging table loaded with all dates then one join query
  3. Explicit chunks with a hard MAX_CHUNKS cap

Also check:

  • Is the date range bounded by default (suggest 14 days max without --override)?
  • If the script crashes mid-run, is it safe to re-run without double-writing?
  • For backdated simulations, verify data is read from time-consistent snapshots (FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF, partitioned as-of tables, or dated snapshot tables). Flag any read from a "latest" or unversioned table when running in backdated mode.

Suggest a concrete rewrite if the current approach is row-by-row.


D) QUERY SAFETY AND SCAN SIZE

For each query, check:

  • Partition filter is on the raw column, not DATE(ts), CAST(...), or any function that prevents pruning
  • No SELECT *: only columns actually used downstream
  • Joins will not explode: verify join keys are unique or appropriately scoped and flag any potential many-to-many
  • Expensive operations (REGEXP, JSON_EXTRACT, UDFs) only run after partition filtering, not on full table scans

Provide a specific SQL fix for any query that fails these checks.


E) SAFE WRITES AND IDEMPOTENCY

Identify every write operation. Flag plain INSERT/append with no dedup logic.

Each write should use one of:

  1. MERGE on a deterministic key (e.g., entity_id + date + model_version)
  2. Write to a staging table scoped to the run, then swap or merge into final
  3. Append-only with a dedupe view: QUALIFY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY <key>) = 1

Also check:

  • Will a re-run create duplicate rows?
  • Is the write disposition (WRITE_TRUNCATE vs WRITE_APPEND) intentional and documented?
  • Is run_id being used as part of the merge or dedupe key? If so, flag it. run_id should be stored as a metadata column, not as part of the uniqueness key, unless you explicitly want multi-run history.

State the recommended approach and the exact dedup key for this codebase.


F) OBSERVABILITY: Can you debug a failure?

Verify:

  • Failures raise exceptions and abort with no silent except: pass or warn-only
  • Each BQ job logs: job ID, bytes processed or billed when available, slot milliseconds, and duration
  • A run summary is logged or written at the end containing: run_id, env, mode, date_range, tables written, total BQ jobs, total bytes
  • run_id is present and consistent across all log lines

If run_id is missing, propose a one-line fix: run_id = run_id or datetime.utcnow().strftime('%Y%m%dT%H%M%S')


Final

1. PASS / FAIL with specific reasons per section (A to F). 2. Patch list ordered by risk, referencing exact functions to change. 3. If FAIL: Top 3 cost risks with a rough worst-case estimate (e.g., "loop over 90 dates x 3 retries = 270 BQ jobs").

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する