本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

create-technical-spike

Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching and resolving critical development decisions before implementation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Create Technical Spike Document

Create time-boxed technical spike documents for researching critical questions that must be answered before development can proceed. Each spike focuses on a specific technical decision with clear deliverables and timelines.

Document Structure

Create individual files in ${input:FolderPath|docs/spikes} directory. Name each file using the pattern: [category]-[short-description]-spike.md (e.g., api-copilot-integration-spike.md, performance-realtime-audio-spike.md).

---
title: "${input:SpikeTitle}"
category: "${input:Category|Technical}"
status: "🔴 Not Started"
priority: "${input:Priority|High}"
timebox: "${input:Timebox|1 week}"
created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]
owner: "${input:Owner}"
tags: ["technical-spike", "${input:Category|technical}", "research"]
---

# ${input:SpikeTitle}

## Summary

**Spike Objective:** [Clear, specific question or decision that needs resolution]

**Why This Matters:** [Impact on development/architecture decisions]

**Timebox:** [How much time allocated to this spike]

**Decision Deadline:** [When this must be resolved to avoid blocking development]

## Research Question(s)

**Primary Question:** [Main technical question that needs answering]

**Secondary Questions:**

- [Related question 1]
- [Related question 2]
- [Related question 3]

## Investigation Plan

### Research Tasks

- [ ] [Specific research task 1]
- [ ] [Specific research task 2]
- [ ] [Specific research task 3]
- [ ] [Create proof of concept/prototype]
- [ ] [Document findings and recommendations]

### Success Criteria

**This spike is complete when:**

- [ ] [Specific criteria 1]
- [ ] [Specific criteria 2]
- [ ] [Clear recommendation documented]
- [ ] [Proof of concept completed (if applicable)]

## Technical Context

**Related Components:** [List system components affected by this decision]

**Dependencies:** [What other spikes or decisions depend on resolving this]

**Constraints:** [Known limitations or requirements that affect the solution]

## Research Findings

### Investigation Results

[Document research findings, test results, and evidence gathered]

### Prototype/Testing Notes

[Results from any prototypes, spikes, or technical experiments]

### External Resources

- [Link to relevant documentation]
- [Link to API references]
- [Link to community discussions]
- [Link to examples/tutorials]

## Decision

### Recommendation

[Clear recommendation based on research findings]

### Rationale

[Why this approach was chosen over alternatives]

### Implementation Notes

[Key considerations for implementation]

### Follow-up Actions

- [ ] [Action item 1]
- [ ] [Action item 2]
- [ ] [Update architecture documents]
- [ ] [Create implementation tasks]

## Status History

| Date   | Status         | Notes                      |
| ------ | -------------- | -------------------------- |
| [Date] | 🔴 Not Started | Spike created and scoped   |
| [Date] | 🟡 In Progress | Research commenced         |
| [Date] | 🟢 Complete    | [Resolution summary]       |

---

_Last updated: [Date] by [Name]_

Categories for Technical Spikes

API Integration

  • Third-party API capabilities and limitations
  • Integration patterns and authentication
  • Rate limits and performance characteristics

Architecture & Design

  • System architecture decisions
  • Design pattern applicability
  • Component interaction models

Performance & Scalability

  • Performance requirements and constraints
  • Scalability bottlenecks and solutions
  • Resource utilization patterns

Platform & Infrastructure

  • Platform capabilities and limitations
  • Infrastructure requirements
  • Deployment and hosting considerations

Security & Compliance

  • Security requirements and implementations
  • Compliance constraints
  • Authentication and authorization approaches

User Experience

  • User interaction patterns
  • Accessibility requirements
  • Interface design decisions

File Naming Conventions

Use descriptive, kebab-case names that indicate the category and specific unknown:

API/Integration Examples:

  • api-copilot-chat-integration-spike.md
  • api-azure-speech-realtime-spike.md
  • api-vscode-extension-capabilities-spike.md

Performance Examples:

  • performance-audio-processing-latency-spike.md
  • performance-extension-host-limitations-spike.md
  • performance-webrtc-reliability-spike.md

Architecture Examples:

  • architecture-voice-pipeline-design-spike.md
  • architecture-state-management-spike.md
  • architecture-error-handling-strategy-spike.md

Best Practices for AI Agents

  1. One Question Per Spike: Each document focuses on a single technical decision or research question

  2. Time-Boxed Research: Define specific time limits and deliverables for each spike

  3. Evidence-Based Decisions: Require concrete evidence (tests, prototypes, documentation) before marking as complete

  4. Clear Recommendations: Document specific recommendations and rationale for implementation

  5. Dependency Tracking: Identify how spikes relate to each other and impact project decisions

  6. Outcome-Focused: Every spike must result in an actionable decision or recommendation

Research Strategy

Phase 1: Information Gathering

  1. Search existing documentation using search/fetch tools
  2. Analyze codebase for existing patterns and constraints
  3. Research external resources (APIs, libraries, examples)

Phase 2: Validation & Testing

  1. Create focused prototypes to test specific hypotheses
  2. Run targeted experiments to validate assumptions
  3. Document test results with supporting evidence

Phase 3: Decision & Documentation

  1. Synthesize findings into clear recommendations
  2. Document implementation guidance for development team
  3. Create follow-up tasks for implementation

Tools Usage

  • search/searchResults: Research existing solutions and documentation
  • fetch/githubRepo: Analyze external APIs, libraries, and examples
  • codebase: Understand existing system constraints and patterns
  • runTasks: Execute prototypes and validation tests
  • editFiles: Update research progress and findings
  • vscodeAPI: Test VS Code extension capabilities and limitations

Focus on time-boxed research that resolves critical technical decisions and unblocks development progress.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する