本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

csharp-docs

Ensure that C# types are documented with XML comments and follow best practices for documentation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

C# Documentation Best Practices

  • Public members should be documented with XML comments.
  • It is encouraged to document internal members as well, especially if they are complex or not self-explanatory.

Guidance for all APIs

  • Use <summary> to provide a brief, one sentence, description of what the type or member does. Start the summary with a present-tense, third-person verb.
  • Use <remarks> for additional information, which can include implementation details, usage notes, or any other relevant context.
  • Use <see langword> for language-specific keywords like null, true, false, int, bool, etc.
  • Use <c> for inline code snippets.
  • Use <example> for usage examples on how to use the member.
    • Use <code> for code blocks. <code> tags should be placed within an <example> tag. Add the language of the code example using the language attribute, for example, <code language="csharp">.
  • Use <see cref> to reference other types or members inline (in a sentence).
  • Use <seealso> for standalone (not in a sentence) references to other types or members in the "See also" section of the online docs.
  • Use <inheritdoc/> to inherit documentation from base classes or interfaces.
    • Unless there is major behavior change, in which case you should document the differences.

Methods

  • Use <param> to describe method parameters.
    • The description should be a noun phrase that doesn't specify the data type.
    • Begin with an introductory article.
    • If the parameter is a flag enum, start the description with "A bitwise combination of the enumeration values that specifies...".
    • If the parameter is a non-flag enum, start the description with "One of the enumeration values that specifies...".
    • If the parameter is a Boolean, the wording should be of the form "<see langword="true" /> to ...; otherwise, <see langword="false" />.".
    • If the parameter is an "out" parameter, the wording should be of the form "When this method returns, contains .... This parameter is treated as uninitialized.".
  • Use <paramref> to reference parameter names in documentation.
  • Use <typeparam> to describe type parameters in generic types or methods.
  • Use <typeparamref> to reference type parameters in documentation.
  • Use <returns> to describe what the method returns.
    • The description should be a noun phrase that doesn't specify the data type.
    • Begin with an introductory article.
    • If the return type is Boolean, the wording should be of the form "<see langword="true" /> if ...; otherwise, <see langword="false" />.".

Constructors

  • The summary wording should be "Initializes a new instance of the <Class> class [or struct].".

Properties

  • The <summary> should start with:
    • "Gets or sets..." for a read-write property.
    • "Gets..." for a read-only property.
    • "Gets [or sets] a value that indicates whether..." for properties that return a Boolean value.
  • Use <value> to describe the value of the property.
    • The description should be a noun phrase that doesn't specify the data type.
    • If the property has a default value, add it in a separate sentence, for example, "The default is <see langword="false" />".
    • If the value type is Boolean, the wording should be of the form "<see langword="true" /> if ...; otherwise, <see langword="false" />. The default is ...".

Exceptions

  • Use <exception cref> to document exceptions thrown by constructors, properties, indexers, methods, operators, and events.
  • Document all exceptions thrown directly by the member.
  • For exceptions thrown by nested members, document only the exceptions users are most likely to encounter.
  • The description of the exception describes the condition under which it's thrown.
    • Omit "Thrown if ..." or "If ..." at the beginning of the sentence. Just state the condition directly, for example "An error occurred when accessing a Message Queuing API."

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する