本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

gen-specs-as-issues

This workflow guides you through a systematic approach to identify missing features, prioritize them, and create detailed specifications for implementation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Product Manager Assistant: Feature Identification and Specification

This workflow guides you through a systematic approach to identify missing features, prioritize them, and create detailed specifications for implementation.

1. Project Understanding Phase

  • Review the project structure to understand its organization
  • Read the README.md and other documentation files to understand the project's core functionality
  • Identify the existing implementation status by examining:
    • Main entry points (CLI, API, UI, etc.)
    • Core modules and their functionality
    • Tests to understand expected behavior
    • Any placeholder implementations

Guiding Questions:

  • What is the primary purpose of this project?
  • What user problems does it solve?
  • What patterns exist in the current implementation?
  • Which features are mentioned in documentation but not fully implemented?

2. Gap Analysis Phase

  • Compare the documented capabilities ONLY against the actual implementation
  • Identify "placeholder" code that lacks real functionality
  • Look for features mentioned in documentation but missing robust implementation
  • Consider the user journey and identify broken or missing steps
  • Focus on core functionality first (not nice-to-have features)

Output Creation:

  • Create a list of potential missing features (5-7 items)
  • For each feature, note:
    • Current implementation status
    • References in documentation
    • Impact on user experience if missing

3. Prioritization Phase

  • Apply a score to each identified gap:

Scoring Matrix (1-5 scale):

  • User Impact: How many users benefit?
  • Strategic Alignment: Fits core mission?
  • Implementation Feasibility: Technical complexity?
  • Resource Requirements: Development effort needed?
  • Risk Level: Potential negative impacts?

Priority = (User Impact × Strategic Alignment) / (Implementation Effort × Risk Level)

Output Creation:

  • Present the top 3 highest-priority missing features based on the scoring
  • For each, provide:
    • Feature name
    • Current status
    • Impact if not implemented
    • Dependencies on other features

4. Specification Development Phase

  • For each prioritized feature, develop a detailed but practical specification:
    • Begin with the philosophical approach: simplicity over complexity
    • Focus on MVP functionality first
    • Consider the developer experience
    • Keep the specification implementation-friendly

For Each Feature Specification:

  1. Overview & Scope

    • What problem does it solve?
    • What's included and what's explicitly excluded?
  2. Technical Requirements

    • Core functionality needed
    • User-facing interfaces (API, UI, CLI, etc.)
    • Integration points with existing code
  3. Implementation Plan

    • Key modules/files to create or modify
    • Simple code examples showing the approach
    • Clear data structures and interfaces
  4. Acceptance Criteria

    • How will we know when it's done?
    • What specific functionality must work?
    • What tests should pass?

5. GitHub Issue Creation Phase

  • For each specification, create a GitHub issue:
    • Clear, descriptive title
    • Comprehensive specification in the body
    • Appropriate labels (enhancement, high-priority, etc.)
    • Explicitly mention MVP philosophy where relevant

Issue Template Structure:

[Feature Name]

Overview

[Brief description of the feature and its purpose]

Scope

[What's included and what's explicitly excluded]

Technical Requirements

[Specific technical needs and constraints]

Implementation Plan

[Step-by-step approach with simple code examples]

Acceptance Criteria

[Clear list of requirements to consider the feature complete]

Priority

[Justification for prioritization]

Dependencies

  • Blocks: [List of issues blocked by this one]
  • Blocked by: [List of issues this one depends on]

Implementation Size

  • Estimated effort: [Small/Medium/Large]
  • Sub-issues: [Links to sub-issues if this is a parent issue]

5.5 Work Distribution Optimization

  • Independence Analysis

    • Review each specification to identify truly independent components
    • Refactor specifications to maximize independent work streams
    • Create clear boundaries between interdependent components
  • Dependency Mapping

    • For features with unavoidable dependencies, establish clear issue hierarchies
    • Create parent issues for the overall feature with sub-issues for components
    • Explicitly document "blocked by" and "blocks" relationships
  • Workload Balancing

    • Break down large specifications into smaller, manageable sub-issues
    • Ensure each sub-issue represents 1-3 days of development work
    • Include sub-issue specific acceptance criteria

Implementation Guidelines:

  • Use GitHub issue linking syntax to create explicit relationships
  • Add labels to indicate dependency status (e.g., "blocked", "prerequisite")
  • Include estimated complexity/effort for each issue to aid sprint planning

6. Final Review Phase

  • Summarize all created specifications
  • Highlight implementation dependencies between features
  • Suggest a logical implementation order
  • Note any potential challenges or considerations

Remember throughout this process:

  • Favor simplicity over complexity
  • Start with minimal viable implementations that work
  • Focus on developer experience
  • Build a foundation that can be extended later
  • Consider the open-source community and contribution model

This workflow embodiment of our approach should help maintain consistency in how features are specified and prioritized, ensuring that software projects evolve in a thoughtful, user-centered way.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する