本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

mvvm-toolkit-di

Wire CommunityToolkit.Mvvm ViewModels into Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection. Covers the .NET Generic Host composition root, constructor injection, service lifetimes (Singleton / Transient / Scoped), IMessenger registration, resolving ViewModels in Views, keyed services, testing seams, and the legacy Ioc.Default escape hatch. Use across WPF, WinUI 3, .NET MAUI, Uno, and Avalonia.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md9.1 KB
  • references/dependency-injection.md8.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

CommunityToolkit.Mvvm + Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection

The MVVM Toolkit deliberately ships no DI container — it composes with Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection, the same container ASP.NET Core, Worker services, and the .NET Generic Host use.

TL;DR. Build the service provider once at startup (prefer Host.CreateDefaultBuilder()). Register services and ViewModels. Inject through constructors. Avoid Ioc.Default.GetService<T>() in user code.


When to use this skill

  • Standing up the composition root for a new XAML app (WPF, WinUI 3, MAUI, Uno, Avalonia)
  • Choosing service/VM lifetimes
  • Wiring IMessenger once and injecting it into ObservableRecipient ViewModels
  • Resolving a page's ViewModel without coupling to a service locator
  • Diagnosing "Unable to resolve service for type X while attempting to activate Y"

For source generators and ViewModel patterns see the mvvm-toolkit skill. For Messenger pub/sub see mvvm-toolkit-messenger.


Recommended composition root (Generic Host)

using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting;
using CommunityToolkit.Mvvm.Messaging;

public partial class App : Application
{
    public IHost Host { get; }

    public App()
    {
        Host = Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.Host
            .CreateDefaultBuilder()
            .ConfigureServices((_, services) =>
            {
                services.AddSingleton<IFilesService, FilesService>();
                services.AddSingleton<ISettingsService, SettingsService>();
                services.AddSingleton<IMessenger>(WeakReferenceMessenger.Default);

                services.AddSingleton<ShellViewModel>();
                services.AddTransient<ContactViewModel>();
                services.AddTransient<EditorViewModel>();
            })
            .Build();
    }

    public static T GetService<T>() where T : class =>
        ((App)Current).Host.Services.GetRequiredService<T>();
}

Generic Host benefits:

  • appsettings.json binding via Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration
  • Logging via Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
  • Hosted services (IHostedService) for background work
  • Scope validation in development builds

WPF and Windows Forms must integrate the host lifetime with the app lifetime — see Use the .NET Generic Host in a WPF app.

Without Generic Host

When you only need a service container and want zero extra dependencies:

var services = new ServiceCollection();
services.AddSingleton<IFilesService, FilesService>();
services.AddTransient<ContactViewModel>();
ServiceProvider provider = services.BuildServiceProvider();

Constructor injection

Inject services and child ViewModels through the constructor:

public sealed partial class ContactViewModel(
    IFilesService files,
    IMessenger messenger,
    ILogger<ContactViewModel> logger)
    : ObservableRecipient(messenger)
{
    [ObservableProperty]
    private string? name;

    [RelayCommand]
    private async Task SaveAsync()
    {
        logger.LogInformation("Saving {Name}", Name);
        await files.SaveAsync(Name!);
    }
}

Why constructor injection beats a service locator:

  • Dependencies are explicit and visible at the call site
  • Unit tests inject fakes/mocks directly
  • The DI container validates the dependency graph at startup
  • Missing registrations throw immediately, not at first use

Lifetimes

LifetimeMethodTypical use in XAML apps
SingletonAddSingleton<T>Shell/main-window VM, settings, file/HTTP services, the shared IMessenger, app-wide caches
TransientAddTransient<T>Per-page or per-document ViewModels (a fresh instance every resolve)
ScopedAddScoped<T>Rarely needed in client apps; useful with explicit IServiceScope (e.g., per-window scopes)
services.AddSingleton<ShellViewModel>();   // 1 instance for app lifetime
services.AddTransient<NoteViewModel>();    // new instance per resolve
services.AddScoped<DialogService>();       // 1 per scope (rare)

Resolving in a View

Resolve the page's root ViewModel in code-behind, then let it pull its own dependencies:

public sealed partial class ContactPage : Page
{
    public ContactViewModel ViewModel { get; }

    public ContactPage()
    {
        ViewModel = App.GetService<ContactViewModel>();
        InitializeComponent();
    }
}

Bind in XAML with {x:Bind ViewModel.Xxx} (compiled bindings) or {Binding Xxx} against DataContext.

For navigation frameworks (WinUI 3 Frame.Navigate, MAUI Shell, Prism, MVVMCross), let the framework resolve the page and the page resolves its ViewModel from DI. Don't new ViewModels manually.


IMessenger registration

Register the messenger you want once, inject IMessenger everywhere:

services.AddSingleton<IMessenger>(WeakReferenceMessenger.Default);
// or
services.AddSingleton<IMessenger>(StrongReferenceMessenger.Default);

Then:

public sealed partial class MyViewModel(IMessenger messenger)
    : ObservableRecipient(messenger) { }

For per-window messengers, register with keyed services or as scoped instances and inject into per-window ViewModels.

See the mvvm-toolkit-messenger skill for the messenger surface area.


Keyed services (.NET 8+)

Resolve different implementations of the same interface by key:

services.AddKeyedSingleton<IExporter, CsvExporter>("csv");
services.AddKeyedSingleton<IExporter, JsonExporter>("json");

public sealed partial class ExportViewModel(
    [FromKeyedServices("csv")] IExporter csvExporter,
    [FromKeyedServices("json")] IExporter jsonExporter)
    : ObservableObject { /* ... */ }

Testing seams

Constructor-injected dependencies are trivial to swap in tests. With Moq:

[Fact]
public async Task Save_calls_files_service()
{
    var files = new Mock<IFilesService>();
    var messenger = new WeakReferenceMessenger();
    var logger = NullLogger<ContactViewModel>.Instance;

    var vm = new ContactViewModel(files.Object, messenger, logger)
    {
        Name = "Ada"
    };

    await vm.SaveCommand.ExecuteAsync(null);

    files.Verify(f => f.SaveAsync("Ada"), Times.Once);
}

If you're mocking Ioc.Default or static state, the ViewModel is using a service locator — refactor to constructor injection.


Legacy: Ioc.Default

CommunityToolkit.Mvvm.DependencyInjection.Ioc is an escape hatch for cases where constructor injection is impossible — XAML-instantiated VMs for design-time data, ValueConverters, control templates.

Ioc.Default.ConfigureServices(
    new ServiceCollection()
        .AddSingleton<IFilesService, FilesService>()
        .AddTransient<ContactViewModel>()
        .BuildServiceProvider());

var files = Ioc.Default.GetRequiredService<IFilesService>();

Treat it as the last resort. Inside ViewModels, services, and any class the DI container can construct, prefer constructor injection.


Common pitfalls

  1. Ioc.Default.GetService<T>() inside a VM constructor. Hides the dependency, breaks unit tests, prevents startup graph validation.
  2. Everything Singleton. A "per-document" VM registered as singleton becomes shared state across all documents — subtle data corruption. Use AddTransient for per-instance VMs.
  3. Multiple BuildServiceProvider() calls. Each call is a fresh container — singletons aren't shared. Build once at startup.
  4. Capturing IServiceProvider in long-lived objects. Indicates a service-locator pattern. Inject the specific dependencies you need.
  5. No scope validation in development. Use Host.CreateDefaultBuilder() (which sets ValidateScopes and ValidateOnBuild in development) so registration mistakes fail at startup, not at first use.
  6. Resolving scoped services from the root provider. They're effectively promoted to singleton lifetime — the warning is silent without scope validation. Either change the lifetime or resolve from an explicit IServiceScope.

References

TopicFile
Full deep dive (Generic Host setup, lifetimes, keyed services, testing patterns, legacy Ioc)references/dependency-injection.md

External:

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Use this skill when the user shares ad campaign performance data and asks what to cut, scale, or test. Trigger for prompts like "analyze my ad campaigns", "where am I wasting ad spend", "reallocate my ad budget", "which ads are actually working", or "ROAS analysis". Do not trigger for campaign planning or creative generation without performance data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月9日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する