本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

error-recovery

Standard recovery patterns for all squad agents. When something fails, adapt — don't just report the failure.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Error Recovery Patterns

Standard recovery patterns for all squad agents. When something fails, adapt — don't just report the failure.


1. Retry with Backoff

When: Transient failures — API timeouts, rate limits, network errors, temporary service unavailability.

Pattern:

  1. Wait briefly, then retry (start at 2s, double each attempt)
  2. Maximum 3 retries before escalating
  3. Log each attempt with the error received

Example: API call returns 429 Too Many Requests → wait 2s → retry → wait 4s → retry → wait 8s → retry → escalate if still failing.


2. Fallback Alternatives

When: Primary tool or approach fails and an alternative exists.

Pattern:

  1. Attempt primary approach
  2. On failure, identify alternative tool/method
  3. Try the alternative with the same intent
  4. Document which alternative was used and why

Example: Primary CLI tool fails → fall back to direct API call for the same operation.


3. Diagnose-and-Fix

When: Build failures, test failures, linting errors — structured errors with actionable output.

Pattern:

  1. Read the full error output carefully
  2. Identify the root cause from error messages
  3. Attempt a targeted fix
  4. Re-run to verify the fix
  5. Maximum 3 fix-retry cycles before escalating

Example: Build fails with a type error → check for missing import → add it → rebuild.


4. Escalate with Context

When: Recovery attempts have been exhausted, or the failure requires human judgment.

Pattern:

  1. Summarize what was attempted and what failed
  2. Include the exact error messages
  3. State what you believe the root cause is
  4. Suggest next steps or who might be able to help
  5. Hand off to the coordinator or the appropriate specialist

Example: After 3 failed build attempts → "Build fails on line 42 with null reference. Tried X, Y, Z. Likely a design issue in the Foo module. Recommend the code owner review."


5. Graceful Degradation

When: A non-critical step fails but the overall task can still deliver value.

Pattern:

  1. Determine if the failed step is critical to the task outcome
  2. If non-critical, log the failure and continue
  3. Deliver partial results with a clear note of what was skipped
  4. Offer to retry the skipped step separately

Example: Generating a report with 5 sections — section 3 data source is unavailable → produce the report with 4 sections, note that section 3 was skipped and why.


Applying These Patterns

Each agent should reference these patterns in their charter's ## Error Recovery section, tailored to their domain. The charter should list the agent's most common failure modes and map each to the appropriate pattern above.

Selection guide:

Failure TypePrimary PatternFallback Pattern
Network/API transientRetry with BackoffEscalate with Context
Tool/dependency missingFallback AlternativesEscalate with Context
Build/test errorDiagnose-and-FixEscalate with Context
Auth/permissionsRetry with BackoffEscalate with Context
Non-critical data missingGraceful Degradation—
Unknown/novel errorEscalate with Context—

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Standard collaboration patterns for all squad agents — worktree awareness, decisions, cross-agent communication

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

Shared hard rules enforced across all squad agents

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

Route gh-aw design, creation, diagnosis, patching, active debugging, and upgrade requests to the right strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

Upgrade gh-aw to latest gh-aw-firewall release and identify follow-up spec tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

Review code that performs git or gh operations against repository checkouts in gh-aw, checking that the right credentials are available at the right time and that sparseness, shallowness and credential-free factors are properly considered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する