本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

go-linters

Add and validate custom Go analysis linters in gh-aw.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Go Linters

Use this guide when adding a new custom Go analysis linter in this repository.

For PR-driven linter generation (derive a rule from a specific pull request pattern), use .github/skills/pr-to-go-linter/SKILL.md.

Where to add a new linter

  1. Create a new package under pkg/linters/<linter-name>/.
  2. Define an analyzer in that package (exported as Analyzer).
  3. Add tests in the same package using analysistest with fixtures under testdata/src/....
  4. Register the analyzer in cmd/linters/main.go so it runs via the multichecker binary.

Build and test linters

  • Test only your linter package:
    • go test ./pkg/linters/<linter-name>/...
  • Build the custom linter runner:
    • go build ./cmd/linters
  • Run all custom linters across the repo:
    • make golint-custom

make golint-custom builds cmd/linters and runs it against ./cmd/... and ./pkg/....

Common AST pitfalls

Unwrap parenthesized expressions

Expressions wrapped in parentheses appear as *ast.ParenExpr. Unwrap expressions before asserting their AST type or comparing identifiers, so forms such as (nil) and (err) are handled like nil and err. Use the shared helper:

if ident, ok := astutil.UnwrapParenExpr(expr).(*ast.Ident); ok && ident.Name == "nil" {
	// Handle nil.
}

Match all relevant statement shapes

Semantically similar calls can appear in different statement nodes. A call that discards a result may be a bare *ast.ExprStmt or part of an *ast.AssignStmt; filtering only for one shape misses the other. Include and handle each relevant node shape:

nodeFilter := []ast.Node{(*ast.AssignStmt)(nil), (*ast.ExprStmt)(nil)}
return analyzerutil.Preorder(pass, nodeFilter, func(n ast.Node) {
	switch stmt := n.(type) {
	case *ast.AssignStmt:
		analyzeAssign(stmt)
	case *ast.ExprStmt:
		analyzeExpr(stmt)
	}
})

Before submitting a linter, check expression-shape assertions for parenthesis unwrapping and verify its node filter covers relevant equivalent syntax forms.

Coverage-aware perf gating

For linters that flag micro-optimizations (allocation/perf rules), only apply them on lines that tests actually exercise — "hot paths" — rather than on dead or rarely-executed code where the optimization brings no measurable benefit. Use the shared pkg/linters/internal/coverage package:

  1. In your analyzer file, register a -hot-threshold flag in init() (not as a var initializer, to avoid an Analyzer/run/flag initialization cycle):

    var hotThreshold *int
    
    func init() {
        hotThreshold = coverage.RegisterHotThresholdFlag(Analyzer)
    }
    
  2. Immediately before reporting a diagnostic, gate it with coverage.ShouldApply:

    if !coverage.ShouldApply(pass, node.Pos(), *hotThreshold) {
        return
    }
    

coverage.ShouldApply is permissive by default: when no coverage profile is loaded via the GH_AW_LINT_COVERAGE_PROFILE environment variable, or when hot-threshold is 0, it always returns true, preserving pre-coverage-aware behavior. Only wire this into linters whose fix has a genuine performance rationale (extra allocations, O(n²) behavior, etc.) — purely readability/style linters should not be coverage-gated.

Generating the coverage profile

go test -covermode=count -coverprofile=/tmp/coverage.out ./...
export GH_AW_LINT_COVERAGE_PROFILE=/tmp/coverage.out
make golint-custom

This profile is read once per linter-runner process. To lint only a specific subtree, scope the go test and golint-custom commands to the same package path.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Standard collaboration patterns for all squad agents — worktree awareness, decisions, cross-agent communication

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

Shared hard rules enforced across all squad agents

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

Route gh-aw design, creation, diagnosis, patching, active debugging, and upgrade requests to the right strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

Upgrade gh-aw to latest gh-aw-firewall release and identify follow-up spec tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

Review code that performs git or gh operations against repository checkouts in gh-aw, checking that the right credentials are available at the right time and that sparseness, shallowness and credential-free factors are properly considered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/gh-aw5,3812026年10月11日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する