本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

oma-debug

Diagnose a reproducible failure, fix its cause, and verify the regression. Use for crashes, incorrect behavior, and failing tests.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(8)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • resources/bug-report-template.md7.4 KB
  • resources/checklist.md1.1 KB
  • resources/common-patterns.md14.8 KB
  • resources/debugging-checklist.md10.3 KB
  • resources/error-playbook.md3.4 KB
  • resources/examples.md2.2 KB
  • resources/execution-protocol.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Debug Agent - Bug Fixing Specialist

Scheduling

Goal

Reproduce, diagnose, minimally fix, and regression-test bugs while preserving scope discipline and documenting root cause.

Intent signature

  • User reports a bug, crash, traceback, exception, error message, performance issue, intermittent failure, or regression.
  • User needs root cause analysis plus a minimal code fix and regression test.

When to use

  • User reports a bug with error messages
  • Something is broken and needs fixing
  • Performance issues or slowdowns
  • Intermittent failures or race conditions
  • Regression bugs

When NOT to use

  • Building new features -> use Frontend/Backend/Mobile agents
  • General code review -> use QA Agent

Expected inputs

  • Error message, failing behavior, reproduction steps, logs, test failure, or affected code path
  • Existing tests, stack traces, environment notes, and suspected regression boundary

Expected outputs

  • Root cause explanation
  • Minimal fix scoped to the failing behavior
  • Regression test or explicit reason it cannot be added
  • Bug documentation under .agents/results/bugs/ when appropriate

Dependencies

  • resources/execution-protocol.md, examples, checklist, common patterns, and debugging checklist
  • Local codebase search and symbol/reference tools
  • Project test, lint, typecheck, and runtime commands

Control-flow features

  • Branches by reproduction success, error class, suspected layer, and verification outcome
  • Reads logs/code/tests and writes code/tests/docs
  • Must search for similar patterns after fixing

Structural Flow

Entry

  1. Capture the reported symptom and suspected scope.
  2. Reproduce or establish the closest reliable failing signal.
  3. Identify affected files, tests, and related patterns.

Scenes

  1. PREPARE: Gather symptoms, logs, reproduction path, and verification command.
  2. ACQUIRE: Read failing code, tests, references, and similar patterns.
  3. REASON: Isolate root cause and reject unsupported hypotheses.
  4. ACT: Apply minimal fix and regression test.
  5. VERIFY: Re-run failing and related checks.
  6. FINALIZE: Document root cause, fix, test, and residual risk.

Transitions

  • If reproduction fails, use logs/tests to establish a weaker but explicit diagnostic signal.
  • If the first fix fails verification, return to root-cause analysis.
  • If similar patterns exist, inspect and patch only affected cases.
  • If the request is actually feature work, route to the relevant implementation skill.

Failure and recovery

  • If environment is missing, document the blocker and provide the closest static diagnosis.
  • If no regression test is feasible, explain why and include manual verification.
  • If fix scope grows, stop and call out the broader design issue.

Exit

  • Success: bug is fixed, regression coverage exists, and checks pass.
  • Partial success: root cause or verification blocker is explicit.

Logical Operations

Actions

ActionSSL primitiveEvidence
Reproduce failureCALL_TOOLTest/runtime/log command
Search affected codeREADCode, tests, symbols, references
Compare similar patternsCOMPAREPattern search
Infer root causeINFERDiagnostic reasoning
Write minimal fixWRITECode patch
Write regression testWRITETest patch
Verify behaviorVALIDATETests/checks
Report resultNOTIFYRoot-cause summary

Tools and instruments

  • Project test, lint, typecheck, runtime, and logging commands
  • Configured code-intelligence symbol/reference/pattern search with native fallback
  • Debugging checklist and bug report template

Canonical workflow path

rg "<error-message-or-symbol>"
rg --files

Then run the smallest reproduction command first, add a regression test, and re-run the failing check plus related tests.

Resource scope

ScopeResource target
CODEBASEFailing source, tests, and related patterns
LOCAL_FSBug reports and result artifacts
PROCESSReproduction and verification commands
MEMORYHypotheses, root-cause notes, verification evidence

Preconditions

  • A bug signal, symptom, or failing behavior is available.
  • Relevant code and verification path can be inspected or the blocker is stated.

Effects and side effects

  • Mutates source/tests only as needed for the fix.
  • May create bug documentation under .agents/results/bugs/.

Guardrails

  1. Reproduce first, then diagnose - never guess at fixes
  2. Identify root cause, not just symptoms
  3. Minimal fix: change only what's necessary
  4. Every fix gets a regression test
  5. Search for similar patterns elsewhere after fixing
  6. Document in .agents/results/bugs/

Code intelligence

Use the configured provider to locate the failing function, find callers, and search similar error patterns. Native search and scoped reads are supported fallbacks; see the shared capability contract.

References

  • Local code tools: ../_shared/core/code-intelligence.md (code search/navigation)

  • Execution steps (follow for the selected task): resources/execution-protocol.md

  • Checklist (pre-submit self-verification): resources/checklist.md

  • Error recovery: resources/error-playbook.md

  • Bug report template: resources/bug-report-template.md

  • Common patterns: resources/common-patterns.md

  • Debugging checklist (investigation guide, used during Steps 1-2): resources/debugging-checklist.md

  • Context loading: ../_shared/core/context-loading.md

  • Context budget: ../_shared/core/context-budget.md

  • Lessons learned: ../_shared/core/lessons-learned.md (matching prior failure or requested retrospective)

  • Observability handoff: ../oma-observability/SKILL.md §Integrations — traces/logs by trace_id, 6-dim forensics

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design-first ideation workflow — explore user intent, clarify constraints, propose approaches, and produce an approved design document before planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gracefullight/pkgs42026年10月2日 更新

commit

無料

Generate Conventional Commits spec git commits (auto-separate by feature)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gracefullight/pkgs42026年10月2日 更新

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gracefullight/pkgs42026年10月2日 更新

When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," or "content planning." For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gracefullight/pkgs42026年10月2日 更新

When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gracefullight/pkgs42026年10月2日 更新

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," or "CTA copy." For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gracefullight/pkgs42026年10月2日 更新

gracefullight のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する