Design-first ideation workflow — explore user intent, clarify constraints, propose approaches, and produce an approved design document before planning
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check documentation references, sync docs to code changes, and detect translation drift. Use for documentation maintenance in a repository.
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Keep documentation aligned with repository behavior and report verification limits.
Check references, update docs for a code diff, identify translation drift, or lint localized prose.
Repository documentation verification, diff-based synchronization, and translation maintenance.
Mode (verify, sync, i18n, or lint), target paths or diff range, and authorized edit scope. Use verify when no mode is specified.
Findings with paths and evidence, authorized patches when requested, and unresolved checks. CLI reports remain distinct from host-authored interpretation.
The oma docs CLI, Git for diff-based work, and repository docs. lychee is optional for URL verification. Read resources/commands.md for flags and output files of the selected mode.
verify: extract and resolve references, then summarize the report.sync: obtain candidates, read relevant docs and diffs, and apply only authorized corrections.i18n / lint: report drift or style issues; use oma-translation for authorized corrections.| Failure | Recovery |
|---|---|
| Missing CLI | State up front that the automated check is unavailable, then inspect manually anyway: list the target markdown files, extract [text](path), , and href/src targets, resolve each relative to its containing file, and report which resolved paths are missing. Skip http(s) URLs and note them as unverified scope. Label the result "manual inspection — oma docs verify did not run"; never present it as CLI output and never make installing the CLI a prerequisite |
| Missing lychee or incomplete URL scan | Report core results and the unverified URL scope |
| One document cannot be parsed | Record the skipped file and continue other documents |
| Patch does not apply | Re-read the affected current content and make the equivalent authorized correction |
| Index write fails | Report the failure; do not claim the index or check is complete |
Report verified findings, edits made, and remaining gaps. A clean reference scan does not establish semantic correctness or complete translation quality.
resources/commands.md.oma docs verify --json, oma docs sync <range> --json, oma docs i18n --json, or oma docs lint --json as appropriate. For sync, use the requested range; otherwise staged changes, then HEAD~1..HEAD.Verification regenerates docs/generated/doc-refs.json; optional URL results go to docs/generated/url-drift.json. Sync's CLI emits candidate data; the host drafts and applies patches. i18n/lint commands report only. A workflow hook runs only when docs.auto_verify is enabled and is warn-only.
../_shared/core/execution-policy.md for authorization and completion..env*, private keys, credentials) in diff reports.oma-docs: skip, and configured exclusions. Missing gitignored runtime outputs are skipped, not broken references.resources/commands.md (selected operation only).../oma-translation/SKILL.md (localized correction).../_shared/core/execution-policy.md (when not already provided).まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design-first ideation workflow — explore user intent, clarify constraints, propose approaches, and produce an approved design document before planning
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate Conventional Commits spec git commits (auto-separate by feature)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," or "content planning." For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," or "CTA copy." For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。