Design-first ideation workflow — explore user intent, clarify constraints, propose approaches, and produce an approved design document before planning
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research customer pain points, trends, and competitors through the OMA market engine. Use for market discovery or voice-of-customer analysis.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Run the upstream last30days research engine (always the latest release, managed by oma) for community-signal research, then frame the result for the user's intent (pain / trend / competitor / discovery) with strategic frameworks and save one brief under .agents/results/market/.
--days 7|30|90|180)--discover), person mode, hiring signals (--hiring-signals), follow-up drills (--drill)oma schedule <action> wrapping this skill--intent pain|trend|competitor|discovery (else classified per resources/intent-rules.md)--days), --vs <entity> (competitor), --frameworks auto|none|swot,5f,pesteloma market run --help) — passed through verbatim.agents/results/market/{topic-slug}-{YYYYMMDD}.md🌐 last30days v{VERSION} · synced {date}); body per the upstream OUTPUT CONTRACT; framework sections appended per intent; engine footer preservedmarket.save_dir (default .agents/results/market/raw/)outputs:
- name: market-brief
description: Single LAW-compliant markdown brief with framework sections
artifact: ".agents/results/market/*.md"
required: true
oma market resolve / oma market run — engine location, Python 3.12+ resolution, --save-dir defaultSKILL.md at the resolved engine root (skillMd in oma market resolve --json) — the authoritative research contractresources/intent-rules.md, resources/frameworks/, resources/output-laws.md, resources/execution-protocol.mdoma market detect-trap gate before anything else (exit 2 = REFUSE, exit 4 = invalid)oma market resolve refreshes the managed copy (throttled) and falls back to the cached copy offline; a pinned market.path / LAST30DAYS_HOME opts outoma market detect-trap "<topic>". Exit 2 → surface the REFUSE reason and reframe suggestion, stop.oma market resolve --json. ok: false → report reason (missing engine → oma market update; missing Python → the install hint) and stop. Never fall back to WebSearch-only synthesis and present it as market research.engine.skillMd top to bottom. It is long by design; do not skim. Treat engine.root as its SKILL_DIR.resources/intent-rules.md; map to engine flags and framework set.oma market run already resolved the interpreter."${LAST30DAYS_PYTHON}" "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/last30days.py" <args>, run oma market run <args> with the same arguments (foreground, 5-minute timeout, --emit=compact). --save-dir is added automatically from market.save_dir unless you pass one.resources/frameworks/).resources/output-laws.md, write .agents/results/market/{topic-slug}-{YYYYMMDD}.md, preview the first 50 lines.--vs <entity> or "A vs B" phrasing → competitor intent → upstream COMPARISON flow (two passes + head-to-head as its contract specifies) → SWOT + Porter's 5F.engine.status: stale → include the note in the report (research ran on the cached engine version).--force only on explicit user reconfirmation.oma market resolve not ok → stop with the reason; no engine run.| Action | SSL primitive | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| detect-trap preflight | VALIDATE | Topic arg, trap pattern rules |
| Resolve engine + Python | CALL_TOOL | oma market resolve --json |
| Read upstream contract | READ | engine.skillMd |
| Classify intent | SELECT | resources/intent-rules.md |
| Upstream pre-research steps | INFER | Upstream SKILL.md Steps 0–0.75 |
| Run engine | CALL_TOOL | oma market run <args> |
| Synthesize + frameworks | WRITE | Upstream OUTPUT CONTRACT, resources/frameworks/ |
| Self-check + write brief | WRITE | resources/output-laws.md, .agents/results/market/ |
oma market detect-trap <topic> (preflight gate)oma market resolve [--refresh|--offline] [--json] (engine + Python resolution; managed latest)oma market update (force-refresh the managed engine)oma market run <engine args…> (passthrough to the resolved upstream engine’s Python entry point)TOPIC="VS Code pain points"
oma market detect-trap "$TOPIC"
oma market resolve --json # read .engine.skillMd, then follow it
# … upstream Steps 0 / 0.45 / 0.5 / 0.55 / 0.75 …
oma market run "$TOPIC" --plan "$QUERY_PLAN_FILE" --subreddits=vscode --emit=compact --save-suffix=v3
| Scope | Resource target |
|---|---|
NETWORK | Inside the engine only (its per-source fetchers); GitHub for the managed engine refresh |
LOCAL_FS | ~/.cache/oma-market/last30days/<tag>/ (engine), ~/.config/last30days/ (engine config, keys), .agents/results/market/ (brief + raw) |
PROCESS | oma market subcommands → the resolved upstream Python entry point |
oma market resolve is ok (engine present; Python ≥ 3.12 found on PATH, via uv, or pinned with market.python / LAST30DAYS_PYTHON)..agents/results/market/{topic-slug}-{YYYYMMDD}.md and raw engine files to market.save_dir.~/.config/last30days/.env (with user consent) and, when Python 3.12 is absent but uv exists, may install a managed CPython 3.12 (~28 MB) after telling the user.resources/execution-protocol.mdresources/intent-rules.mdresources/output-laws.mdresources/frameworks/swot.md, resources/frameworks/porters-5f.md, or resources/frameworks/pestel.md (load only the selected framework)resources/checklist.mdresources/error-playbook.mdengine.skillMd path from oma market resolve --json; upstream scripts are managed engine files, not bundled skill resources.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design-first ideation workflow — explore user intent, clarify constraints, propose approaches, and produce an approved design document before planning
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate Conventional Commits spec git commits (auto-separate by feature)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," or "content planning." For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," or "CTA copy." For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。