Design-first ideation workflow — explore user intent, clarify constraints, propose approaches, and produce an approved design document before planning
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find external documentation, web sources, or remote code with citations. Local code navigation uses the configured code tools.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Route an information request to the appropriate channel and return relevant sources with trust labels.
oma-scm; architecture analysis -> oma-architecture.Query, optional route hint (docs, web, code, local), source/recency constraints, and flags. Explicit --docs, --code, or --web selects the route; --strict filters trust, --wide retains labeled results, and --gitlab selects the remote code host.
Ranked sources with URL or file reference, route, relevance, trust level/score, and material fallback limits. Do not invent sources when no reliable result is found.
Context7 for docs, runtime web search, oma search/gh/glab for remote code, and configured code intelligence or native local search.
| Route | Primary | Fallback | Use for |
|---|---|---|---|
docs | Context7 resolve-library-id → query-docs | Web search | Official API/framework documentation |
web | Runtime web search | oma search fetch <url> for known result URLs | Web sources |
code | oma search code | Report unavailable host/auth | Remote repository patterns |
local | Configured code-intelligence provider | Native search and scoped reads | Current project files and symbols |
../_shared/core/code-intelligence.md.unknown with score —; do not imply verification.--strict: report that outcome and offer a wider or narrower query.Return evidence-backed results and disclose failed routes or source limitations. A domain score alone does not verify an individual claim.
resources/intent-rules.md only when classification is needed; select one route unless ambiguity requires more.resources/execution-protocol.md for the selected channel's command flags, fetch strategies, or normalization details.resources/trust-registry.md; reuse the current session cache. Apply --strict after scoring.oma search code "<query>" [--host gitlab] [--language <lang>] [--repo <owner/repo>]
oma search trust <domain>
oma search fetch <url>
The CLI also exposes api, api:search, meta, rss, rss:google, media, archive, and doctor; use a primitive only when the selected route needs it.
Search may contact external services or inspect local code and spawn gh/glab processes. Query constraints, selected sources, and trust metadata are session context; persistent caches belong in generated state, not skill definitions.
resources/intent-rules.md (no explicit route or ambiguous query)resources/execution-protocol.md (selected channel only)resources/trust-registry.md (non-local sources)resources/error-playbook.md (route failures)resources/checklist.md (applicable route checks)resources/examples.md (unfamiliar input/output contracts)../_shared/core/code-intelligence.mdまだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design-first ideation workflow — explore user intent, clarify constraints, propose approaches, and produce an approved design document before planning
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate Conventional Commits spec git commits (auto-separate by feature)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," or "content planning." For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," or "CTA copy." For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。