本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

app-store-changelog

Create user-facing App Store release notes by collecting and summarizing all user-impacting changes since the last git tag (or a specified ref). Use when asked to generate a comprehensive release changelog, App Store "What's New" text, or release notes based on git history or tags.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md1.8 KB
  • references/release-notes-guidelines.md1.6 KB
  • scripts/collect_release_changes.sh796 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

App Store Changelog

Overview

Generate a comprehensive, user-facing changelog from git history since the last tag, then translate commits into clear App Store release notes.

Workflow

1) Collect changes

  • Run scripts/collect_release_changes.sh from the repo root to gather commits and touched files.
  • If needed, pass a specific tag or ref: scripts/collect_release_changes.sh v1.2.3 HEAD.
  • If no tags exist, the script falls back to full history.

2) Triage for user impact

  • Scan commits and files to identify user-visible changes.
  • Group changes by theme (New, Improved, Fixed) and deduplicate overlaps.
  • Drop internal-only work (build scripts, refactors, dependency bumps, CI).

3) Draft App Store notes

  • Write short, benefit-focused bullets for each user-facing change.
  • Use clear verbs and plain language; avoid internal jargon.
  • Prefer 5 to 10 bullets unless the user requests a different length.

4) Validate

  • Ensure every bullet maps back to a real change in the range.
  • Check for duplicates and overly technical wording.
  • Ask for clarification if any change is ambiguous or possibly internal-only.

Output Format

  • Title (optional): "What’s New" or product name + version.
  • Bullet list only; one sentence per bullet.
  • Stick to storefront limits if the user provides one.

Resources

  • scripts/collect_release_changes.sh: Collect commits and touched files since last tag.
  • references/release-notes-guidelines.md: Language, filtering, and QA rules for App Store notes.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when evaluating, designing, or pressure-testing the business model of an AI agent product. Triggers on "agent business model", "agent economics", "agent canvas", "evaluate agent product", "agent pricing", "agent unit economics", "agentic business", "AI agent company", "agent cost structure".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

harperreed/dotfiles3352026年10月3日 更新

Use when someone wants to launch a content brand from scratch on any platform. Triggers on "launch a channel", "start a YouTube channel", "build a podcast", "start a newsletter", "content brand", "creator launchpad", "build my audience", "start creating content", "grow on TikTok", "start a blog".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

harperreed/dotfiles3352026年10月3日 更新

Use when you have an existing pipeline DOT file that needs review, fixing, or validation. Use when validation produces warnings or errors, when a DOT file was hand-written or generated by another tool, or when you want to verify a pipeline covers 100% of a spec before running it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

harperreed/dotfiles3352026年10月3日 更新

Use when you want to build a project but don't have a spec yet and need to brainstorm the idea into a design doc structured for pipeline DOT generation. Use when starting from a vague idea, project concept, or feature request that needs to become a headless autonomous build pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

harperreed/dotfiles3352026年10月3日 更新

Use when you have a spec, design doc, structured plan, or prompt_plan and need to generate a pipeline Graphviz DOT file for headless autonomous building. The agent reads the spec, extracts build pipeline phases, determines tech stack, asks about human gates and model preferences, generates a validated DOT digraph with rich self-contained prompts, and saves it to the project root. Handles any language or framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

harperreed/dotfiles3352026年10月3日 更新

Use when a pipeline DOT file has passed structural validation but may still have flow inefficiencies, spec fidelity gaps, or information loss in prompts. Use after dotfile-audit or dotfile-from-spec when you want to deeply verify a pipeline captures everything from the original spec. Use when prompts might be missing critical domain rules, data models, or invariants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

harperreed/dotfiles3352026年10月3日 更新

harperreed のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する