本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

document

Record a decision, document existing code, or file a supplied research material. Modes: document decision (ADR, RFC, or rule), document code (spec, doc, guide, or scenario for existing behavior), document research (only when a finished report or one external material is already in hand). Use for 'we decided', 'record this decision', 'document why we chose X', 'make it our standard', 'draft an RFC', 'should we switch to Y' proposals, 'resolve the RFC', 'we accepted the proposal', 'document the auth module', 'capture how the payment system works', reference material, how-to instructions, or a user flow with examples over an existing spec. Name the type inside the subject to skip the type question. Planning a feature or an intended user journey → /archcore:plan. Checking docs against code or docs health → /archcore:review.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md11.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

/archcore:document

Record the present state: a technical decision, existing code, or a supplied research material. The first word of the arguments selects the mode; a gate inside the mode's track selects the document type. Write affinity: knowledge types; a filed research and the decision cascade's plan belong to vision. The standard cascade can add a cpat (experience).

Command tense: /archcore:plan declares a future canon delta, /archcore:document records the present state — including work that shipped without a plan — and /archcore:review reconciles a past declared delta. Δ vocabulary: skills/_shared/delta-routing.md.

Load skills/_shared/gate-contract.md and skills/_shared/elicitation-contract.md before executing any gate.

Modes

ModeTrack and entryTypes the entry gate selects
decisionskills/_shared/tracks/decision.md, decision.classifyadr, rfc; rule through the standard cascade; an existing rfc draft on the topic → decision.resolve, which records an adr on an accepted verdict
codeskills/_shared/tracks/describe.md, describe.readspec, doc, guide, scenario
researchskills/_shared/tracks/research.md, research.frameresearch, rnd by the closing test; one external material → evidence

A document type name is not a mode. When the subject text names a type (skills/_shared/gate-contract.md, Entry terms) that the mode's track produces, the selecting gate treats that type as settled and asks no type question: document decision rfc for gRPC reaches the RFC branch. A leading word that is not a mode is topic text and goes through classification (Step 3). No mode produces a journey; an intended user path belongs to /archcore:plan.

When to use

  • "We decided to go with microservices" — settled decision
  • "Record the decision to use PostgreSQL"
  • "Document why we chose JWT over sessions"
  • "Make this our team standard for error handling"
  • "Draft an RFC for switching from REST to gRPC"
  • "Should we switch to Kubernetes?" — open proposal
  • "We accepted the proposal — resolve the RFC" — proposal resolution
  • "Document the auth module"
  • "Capture how the payment system works"
  • "Create reference docs for the config system" — reference material
  • "Write a guide for the release process" — how-to instructions
  • document code scenario for checkout — a user flow with examples over an existing spec
  • document research <report> — file a ready investigation
  • document research <material> — file one external material as evidence

Not document:

  • Planning a feature, an initiative, or an intended user journey → /archcore:plan
  • Checking documents against code, reviewing branch changes, or docs health → /archcore:review
  • First-time setup → /archcore:init

Routing table

SignalRoute
No arguments→ git investigation of the branch changes, then one classifying question (Step 3, Unclear)
The first word is a mode — decision, code, research→ mode entry, no routing (Step 2)
Decision signals: "we decided", "record this decision", "document why we chose X", "make it our standard", "draft an RFC", a "should we switch to Y" proposal. A bare "compare X vs Y" with no proposed target belongs to /archcore:plan's research track; a proposal to add a new capability with no named technical target ("should we add caching?") is feature framing → /archcore:plan, sdd track→ decision track — skills/_shared/tracks/decision.md, entry at decision.classify
Resolution signals: "resolve the RFC", "we accepted the proposal", "reject the RFC" — an rfc draft exists on the topic→ decision track — skills/_shared/tracks/decision.md, entry at decision.resolve
Code-doc signals: "document the auth module", "capture how the payment system works", reference material (registry, glossary, lookup), how-to instructions, a user flow with examples over an existing spec→ describe track — skills/_shared/tracks/describe.md, entry at describe.read
Research-material signals: a supplied investigation report, benchmark, transcript, or vendor document to file as is→ research track — skills/_shared/tracks/research.md, entry at research.frame
Unclear→ git investigation, then one classifying question (Step 3)

Execution

Step 1: Ground

Apply skills/_shared/research-compatibility.md under its condition 1 — a request or type naming research or evidence, the research track, or a grounding result of either type. If this skill has no shell tool and no probe result was supplied, report needs-vocabulary-probe with the helper path and stop before the first MCP call that names either type. Before delegating research or evidence work, pass the current vocabulary probe result and absolute plugin root to the assistant. If the assistant returns needs-vocabulary-probe, run the helper and resume the same task. Before delegating any other document write or relation work, pass the absolute plugin root to the assistant. The assistant reads skills/_shared/relation-authoring.md under that root. Apply skills/_shared/actor-subject-compatibility.md under its own condition 1 — a request whose subject names scenario or journey, or a grounding result of either type. When that probe returns yes, add scenario and journey to the type filter below. On older engines, keep the legacy filter; a code request whose subject names scenario then reports the required version and exits without a write. When the probe returns yes, add research and evidence to the type filter below. On older engines, keep the legacy filter.

Search .archcore/ on the request topic across all three categories — vision, knowledge, experience. Do not exclude a category from reads. Pass a type filter matched to this command's moment (adr, rfc, spec, doc, guide, rule, plus rnd as decision evidence, and research and evidence when the probe returned yes) instead of relying on the global type ranking. When a found document carries implements, depends_on, or related relations, pull the linked documents one hop across categories. Duplicate handling lives in the tracks' check-existing gates — do not resolve duplicates here.

If .archcore/ does not exist, announce initialization in one line and call mcp__archcore__init_project without asking a question. If .archcore/ exists but contains no documents, proceed on outer-context grounding and report that zero documents were found.

Global sources. If a mcp__archcore__list_documents / mcp__archcore__search_documents result has global: true / read_only: true / source_kind: "global", load skills/_shared/globals.md. Also load it when a search_documents response's coverage names a source other than "local" — even when results is empty: the empty page is exactly where that file's retry ladder applies. Never modify a global document and never target one with add_relation. Absent any global match, proceed as usual.

Step 2: Mode entry

If the first word is a mode, execute the mapped entry without routing:

  • decision → decision track. An rfc draft on the topic plus resolution wording enters decision.resolve; any other request enters decision.classify, which selects adr, rfc, or the standard outcome. A type name in the subject (adr, rfc, rule) satisfies that gate's skip_when.
  • code → describe track at describe.read. describe.draft selects spec, doc, guide, or scenario; a type name in the subject settles its type question. describe.read records features/*.feature files as evidence when present; a scenario with no covering spec routes to the earliest gate that produces the spec per skills/_shared/gate-contract.md.
  • research → research track at research.frame; the supplied report satisfies frame inputs without an interview (investigation versus one external material: skills/_shared/gate-contract.md, Entry terms), and the closing test selects the type — a report that ends in a recommendation is an rnd, a report that covers a scope is a research. One external material with no investigation enters research.gather as standalone evidence, records the request in the evidence draft's Clarifications, and exits after gather. Follow the compatibility contract's no-write exit when the type is unsupported.

Then go to Step 4.

Step 3: Classify

Classify the target as resolution, decision, code-doc, research material, or unclear:

  • Resolution — the request names a verdict on an existing open proposal (resolution signals above) and an rfc draft on the topic exists → decision track at decision.resolve. Check this before Decision: wording that also reads as a settled-decision signal ("we accepted the proposal") routes here whenever a matching rfc draft exists.
  • Decision — the request records a settled choice or an open proposal (decision signals above) → decision track at decision.classify.
  • Code-doc — the request describes existing code, reference material, a procedure, or a user flow over an existing spec (code-doc signals above) → describe track at describe.read.
  • Research material — the request supplies a ready report or one external material to file (research-material signals above) → research track at research.frame.
  • Unclear — inspect git state and the working tree first: recent commits and changed files are evidence of what the user has been working on. If the evidence still supports both readings, ask one classifying question — "Is this a decision to record or existing code to document?" — with the recommendation drawn from the git evidence.

Step 4: Execute the track

Run the selected track gate by gate per skills/_shared/gate-contract.md. The track owns check-existing, per-gate elicitation, composition, and relation wiring.

Question budget: per skills/_shared/elicitation-contract.md — auto mode draws from the shared per-invocation ceiling; a mode entry raises to the track's per-gate maxima.

Result

Report the produced documents grouped by category:

  • knowledge — adr, rfc, spec, doc, guide, rule, evidence, scenario
  • vision — research (scope-covering report), rnd (recommendation-closed report, or compatibility fallback), plan (architecture cascade)
  • experience — cpat (standard cascade opt-in)

List each document's path and relation edges. Name tracks and steps in plain words; do not print a gate address of the form <track>.<stage>. Close with one recommended next action naming only /archcore:plan, /archcore:review, or a repeat /archcore:document invocation with its mode.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use AtomLane to compile and execute safe atomic parallel plans on macOS and native Windows Preview for worthwhile independent argv tasks, dependency DAGs, supported platform entrypoints, or Apple-silicon operators. Use at task start or an execution boundary when structured local work may contain two or more worthwhile units; skip plain answers, one quick command, and work whose effects cannot be safely bounded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2732026年10月10日 更新

add

無料

Register a deferred decision in the debt registry. Trigger by judgment, not a marker scan, whenever a future reader would ask "why this way?": an unmade decision, stub, loosened type, bypassed check, swallowed error, a default picked "for now", or a TODO/FIXME/HACK/XXX marker. Trigger immediately whenever you defer work, or when the user invokes $add. Over-register freely; the developer drops with "drop A", "drop A,C", or "drop all".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2732026年10月10日 更新

ADK 框架适配层。为 LangChain / EINO / AutoGen / AgentScope / CrewAI 提供框架特定的 代码模板、惯用模式、API 映射和项目结构,供 agent-dev-workshop Phase 5 代码生成使用。 每个框架 reference 文件标注 verified_date 用于版本锁定。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2732026年10月10日 更新

中文调试修复技能。用于报错、测试失败、页面异常、功能不符合预期、需要定位根因并做最小修复时。触发语包括"进入调试模式""帮我修问题""报错了""测试失败""页面坏了""找根因"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2732026年10月10日 更新

交互式 AI Agent 开发工作坊:通过 6 阶段深度协作对话,引导用户完成 Agent 需求分析、架构设计、 工具定义、Prompt 与编排设计、代码生成、验证迭代,产出可直接运行的 Agent 项目。 框架无关设计优先,支持 LangChain / EINO / AutoGen / AgentScope / CrewAI 等 ADK 框架。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2732026年10月10日 更新

中文漂移审计技能。用于项目或学习过程变乱、上下文漂移、任务分叉、多个方案冲突、命名不一致、Codex 可能顺手改多了时。触发语包括"漂移检查""感觉跑偏了""项目变乱了""检查是否失控""分叉太多""上下文漂移"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2732026年10月10日 更新

hashgraph-online のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する