本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ship

Release-gate sequence: validate → review → push → tag. Wraps kernel:git mechanics with the pre-ship safety chain. Triggers: ship, release, push to main, ready to merge, deploy.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md7.2 KB
  • reference/ship-research.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<skill id="ship">

Sequence

  1. Preflight

    • git status --porcelain — clean? If not: ask user to commit, stash, or abandon.
    • git branch --show-current — matches intent? Wrong branch → stop.
    • git log --oneline {main}..HEAD — commit range matches what you think you're shipping?
    • (gate: any mismatch → AskUserQuestion before continuing)
  2. Validate

    • Invoke /kernel:validate (spawns validator agent, full 9-gate safety chain).
    • If unavailable: run project's nearest configured command (see reference/ship-research.md for equivalents).
    • (gate: any FAIL → stop; report which gate; do NOT push)
    • For plugins that support multiple loaders, validate each loader's schema independently and exercise one installed payload per loader. A shared file parsing successfully is not proof that its armed behavior is equivalent.
    • Run install, supported upgrade, and documented recovery commands in a disposable plugin/cache copy from outside the source checkout. Assert user data and user-owned files are unchanged.
    • Put an explicit resource ceiling around heavyweight suites when available; a release gate must fail loudly instead of exhausting the host machine.
  3. Review

    • Tier 1 (1–2 file changes, low risk): self-review via Big 5 from skills/quality/SKILL.md.
    • Tier 2+: invoke /kernel:review (spawns reviewer agent, >80% confidence threshold).
    • (gate: REQUEST CHANGES → stop; address feedback; restart from step 2)
    • (gate: COMMENT → AskUserQuestion: "Address now, ship anyway, or hold?")
    • (gate: APPROVE → continue)
  4. Push

    • Feature branch (feat/*, fix/*, chore/*, etc.): git push (or git push -u origin {branch} if upstream not set).
    • main / master: STOP. AskUserQuestion required. (NEXUS I0.8)
    • Detached HEAD or unexpected state: stop; investigate.
    • (gate: push rejected / non-fast-forward → surface to user; do NOT force-push)
  5. Version + Tag (on a release)

    • Semver: patch=fix, minor=feature or behavior-preserving refactor, major=breaking. Confirm the number with the user.
    • Bump ALL canonical declarations in one shot: scripts/bump-version.sh X.Y.Z updates .claude-plugin/plugin.json, .claude-plugin/marketplace.json, governance/kernel.md.tmpl, regenerates AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md, and updates skills/help/SKILL.md. NEVER hand-edit one location — drift fails test_version_sync_all.
    • Human-author the release prose the script does NOT touch: the plugin/marketplace description highlight + a CHANGELOG.md entry (## [X.Y.Z] - DATE + Added/Changed/Fixed).
    • (gate: bash tests/run-tests.sh green — test_version_sync_all confirms no stale version anywhere.)
    • If a native manifest validator rejects required safety metadata, do not weaken the safety metadata or hand-author an unvalidated manifest. Keep the proven compatibility loader, record the limitation, and defer the native manifest until both schemas can be satisfied.
    • Tag (only if user requested a tagged release): git tag -l to avoid clobber → git tag -a v{X.Y.Z} -m "{summary}" → git push origin v{X.Y.Z}.
    • Before upgrading the installed plugin on this machine: pgrep -fl codex. The upgrade deletes the old cache directory under a live session's feet and every hook in that session exits 127 until it restarts. Name the live sessions in the handoff and say they need a restart; never report "upgraded" as if it covered them (docs/upgrading.md, 2026-08-27).
    • After publishing the GitHub release, install it into Claude's own cache and verify a fresh headless Claude process: scripts/install-release.sh X.Y.Z. The script updates only Claude's marketplace/cache, atomically advances Claude's current selector, and fails unless both the installed manifest and the fresh process report X.Y.Z. Codex installation remains a separate operation.
  6. Human pass (any user-facing release: app build, deploy, anything a person will touch)

    • Load skills/human-pass/SKILL.md and write the guide for THIS build: literal controls, paste-ready inputs, expected outcome per step, worst case first, bundled to one sitting with the time cost stated.
    • Hand it over and wait. The build is not shipped, it is awaiting verdict.
    • (gate: no guide, or no recorded verdict → the release is NOT done. Say "awaiting your pass on <build>", never "shipped". A green pipeline is not a person having used the thing.)
    • Findings come back as prose; YOU convert them into issues, not the human.
    • Record the verdict as a state-change receipt on the release issue, naming what it unlocks (next build, submission, deploy promotion).
  7. Checkpoint

    • agentdb learn pattern "ship: {branch} {commit_range} {sha_pushed}" "validate=pass review=pass push=ok"
    • Profile-gated: github-oss/github-production → post PR or release note via gh CLI.

The verdict is part of done

For anything a person will use, the completion states are ordered: validated, merged, deployed, accepted. CI proves the first three. Only a human who used the build proves the fourth, and only that one predicts whether the release was any good: a 15-minute guided pass found five defects that 500+ green tests had not, because some properties only exist on the far side of a real screen with real data. Report the state you actually reached, by name.

Ask-user gates (mandatory pause points)

PointConditionQuestion
PreflightBranch or commit range is ambiguous"Shipping {N} commits on {branch}. Confirm?"
ReviewCOMMENT verdict"Review returned {N} comments. Address now, ship anyway, or hold?"
PushTarget is main/master"About to push to main. NEXUS I0.8 requires explicit say-so. Confirm?"

Failure modes

  1. validate FAIL → block; report which gate; do not loop silently
  2. review REQUEST_CHANGES → block; address comments; restart from step 2
  3. push rejected (non-fast-forward) → ask user; never auto-rebase or force-push
  4. tag conflict → check git tag -l first; suggest next version; never overwrite existing tag

Anti-patterns

  • ship_without_validate — every step depends on the previous; skipping validate skips type/test/security
  • silent_skip_review — review FAIL with no surfacing to user = trust violation
  • auto_push_to_main — NEXUS I0.8; main requires explicit user confirmation
  • force_push_on_rejection — rejection means remote has work you don't; investigate before overwriting
  • tag_without_release_intent — tags are durable; casual pushes get no tag
  • skip_checkpoint — shipped-but-unrecorded work breaks retrospective and learning loops

<on_complete> agentdb write-end '{"skill":"ship","branch":"X","commits":N,"validate":"pass","review":"approve|comment|skip","pushed":true,"tagged":"X.Y.Z|none"}' </on_complete>

</skill>

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use AtomLane to compile and execute safe atomic parallel plans on macOS and native Windows Preview for worthwhile independent argv tasks, dependency DAGs, supported platform entrypoints, or Apple-silicon operators. Use at task start or an execution boundary when structured local work may contain two or more worthwhile units; skip plain answers, one quick command, and work whose effects cannot be safely bounded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2752026年10月11日 更新

add

無料

Register a deferred decision in the debt registry. Trigger by judgment, not a marker scan, whenever a future reader would ask "why this way?": an unmade decision, stub, loosened type, bypassed check, swallowed error, a default picked "for now", or a TODO/FIXME/HACK/XXX marker. Trigger immediately whenever you defer work, or when the user invokes $add. Over-register freely; the developer drops with "drop A", "drop A,C", or "drop all".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2752026年10月11日 更新

ADK 框架适配层。为 LangChain / EINO / AutoGen / AgentScope / CrewAI 提供框架特定的 代码模板、惯用模式、API 映射和项目结构,供 agent-dev-workshop Phase 5 代码生成使用。 每个框架 reference 文件标注 verified_date 用于版本锁定。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2752026年10月11日 更新

中文调试修复技能。用于报错、测试失败、页面异常、功能不符合预期、需要定位根因并做最小修复时。触发语包括"进入调试模式""帮我修问题""报错了""测试失败""页面坏了""找根因"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2752026年10月11日 更新

交互式 AI Agent 开发工作坊:通过 6 阶段深度协作对话,引导用户完成 Agent 需求分析、架构设计、 工具定义、Prompt 与编排设计、代码生成、验证迭代,产出可直接运行的 Agent 项目。 框架无关设计优先,支持 LangChain / EINO / AutoGen / AgentScope / CrewAI 等 ADK 框架。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2752026年10月11日 更新

中文漂移审计技能。用于项目或学习过程变乱、上下文漂移、任务分叉、多个方案冲突、命名不一致、Codex 可能顺手改多了时。触发语包括"漂移检查""感觉跑偏了""项目变乱了""检查是否失控""分叉太多""上下文漂移"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1,2752026年10月11日 更新

hashgraph-online のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する